Embedding of Superelastic SMA Wires into Composite Structures: Evaluation of Impact Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Shape memory alloy (SMA) represents the most versatile way to realize smart materials with sensing, controlling, and actuating functions. Due to their unique mechanical and thermodynamic properties and to the possibility to obtain SMA wires with very small diameters, they are used as smart components embedded into the conventional resins or composites, obtaining active abilities, tunable properties, self-healing properties, and damping capacity. Moreover, superelastic SMAs are used to increase the impact resistance properties of composite materials. In this study, the influence of the integration of thin superelastic wires to suppress propagating damage of composite structures has been investigated. Superelastic SMAs have very high strain to failure and recoverable elastic strain, due to a stress-induced martensitic phase transition creating a plateau region in the stress-strain curve. NiTi superelastic wires (Af = −15 °C fully annealed) of 0.10 mm in diameter have been produced and characterized by SAES Getters. The straight annealed wire shows the typical flag stress-strain behavior. The measured loading plateau is about 450 MPa at ambient temperature with a recoverable elastic strain of more than 6%. For these reasons superelastic SMA fibers can absorb much more strain energy than other fibers before their failure, partly with a constant stress level. In this paper, the improvement of composite laminates impact properties by embedding SMA wires is evaluated and indications for design and manufacturing of SMA composites with high-impact properties are also given.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. R. Stalmans, V. Michaud, J.E. Bidaux, R. Gotthardt, and J.A.E. Manson, Adaptive Composites with Embedded Shape Memory Alloy Wires, Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, G.R. Tomlinsonen and W.A. Bullough, Eds. (Bristol, UK), Institute of Physics Publishing, 1998, p 801–804
2. C. Boller, Shape Memory Alloys – Their Challenge to Contribute to Smart Structures, Annual Meeting of the Materials Research Society, December 1999, Boston, USA (invited paper)10.1557/PROC-604-87 ↗
3. R. Stalmans, Adaptive Hybrid Composites with a Focus on the Integration of Shape Memory Elements, Advances in Science and Technology, 25, Smart Materials Systems, P. Vincenzini, Ed. (Faenza, Italy), Techna, 1999, p 83–94 (invited lecture)
4. R. Stalmans, K. Tsoi, and J. Schrooten, The Transformational Behaviour of Shape Memory Wires Embedded in a Composite Matrix, Fifth European Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol 4073, P.F. Gobin and C.M. Friend, Eds., 2000, p 88–9610.1117/12.396420 ↗
5. Tsoi K. et al. “Impact damage behavior of shape memory alloy composites.” Mater. Sci. Eng., 2003, 342,1–2, pp. 207–15.10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00317-9 ↗
6. Lau Kin-tak et al. “Low velocity impacts on shape memory alloy stitched composite plates.” Smart. Mater. Struct, 13, pp. 364–70, (2004).10.1088/0964-1726/13/2/015 ↗
7. S.John and M.Hariri, “Effect of shape memory alloy actuation on the dynamic response of polymeric composite plates”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing,39, 5, 769–776, 2008, May.10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.005 ↗
8. S. M. R. Khalili et al., “Low-velocity impact response of active thin walled hybrid composite structures embedded with SMA wires”, Thin-Walled Structures, 45, 9, 799–808, (2007), Sept.10.1016/j.tws.2007.01.017 ↗
9. S. M. R. Khalili and al, “Effect of smart stiffening procedure on low-velocity impact response of smart structures”, Journal of Mat. Proc. Technology, 190, 1–3, 142–152, July, (2007).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.052 ↗
10. Run-xin Zhang and al, “Mechanical properties of composites filled with SMA particles and short fibers”, Composite Structures, 79, 1, 90–96, June, (2007).10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.032 ↗
11. ASTM D256-06ae1 Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics, 2006
12. ASTM D790 07e1 Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Insulating Materials, 2007
13. S.R. Reid and G. Zhou, Impact Behaviour of Fibre-Reinforced Composite Materials and Structures, Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 200010.1201/9781439822814 ↗
14. K.L. Reifsnider, Fatigue of Composite Materials, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1991
15. M. O. Bora, O. Coban, et al., “On the life time prediction of repeatedly impacted thermoplastic matrix composites”, Materials and Design, 30, 1, 145–153, (2009).10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.036 ↗
16. O. S. David-West et al., “An experimental study of damage accumulation in balanced CFRP laminates due to repeated impact”, Composite Structures, 83, 3, 247–258, May, (2008).10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.015 ↗