Influence of Cutting Parameters and Tool Wear on the Surface Integrity of Cobalt-Based Stellite 6 Alloy When Machined Under a Dry Cutting Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
The efficiency of a machining process can be measured by evaluating the quality of the machined surface and the tool wear rate. The research reported herein is mainly focused on the effect of cutting parameters and tool wear on the machined surface defects, surface roughness, deformation layer and residual stresses when dry milling Stellite 6, deposited by overlay on a carbon steel surface. The results showed that under the selected cutting conditions, abrasion, diffusion, peeling, chipping and breakage were the main tool wear mechanisms presented. Also the feed rate was the primary factor affecting the tool wear with an influence of 83%. With regard to the influence of cutting parameters on the surface roughness, the primary factors were feed rate and cutting speed with 57 and 38%, respectively. In addition, in general, as tool wear increased, the surface roughness increased and the deformation layer was found to be influenced more by the cutting parameters rather than the tool wear. Compressive residual stresses were observed in the un-machined surface, and when machining longer than 5 min, residual stress changed 100% from compression to tension. Finally, results showed that micro-crack initiation was the main mechanism for chip formation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Sato, T. Omori, K. Oikawa, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, and K. Ishida, Cobalt-Base High-Temperature Alloys, AAAS/Science, 2006, 312(5770), p 90–91
2. V. Kuzucu, M. Ceylan, H. Celik, and I. Aksoy, An Investigation of Stellite-6 Alloy Containing 5.0 wt% Silicon, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1998, 79, p 47–5110.1016/S0924-0136(97)00452-4 ↗
3. M. Benghersallah, L. Boulanouar, G.L. Coz, A. Devillez, and D. Dudzinski, Dry High Speed Milling of Cobalt-Base Hard Facing Superalloy, Mechanika, 2012, 18(5), p 591–59910.5755/j01.mech.18.5.2707 ↗
4. H. Danny, W. Rafael, H. Thomas, T. Stefan, Milling of cast material and PT-hard-facing layers of the cobalt-base-alloy stellite 12. Annals of DAAAM for 2011 and Proceedings of the 22nd International DAAAM Symposium, 2011, vol. 22, p 949–950
5. C. Lahiff, S. Gordon, and P. Phelan, PCBN Tool Wear Modes and Mechanisms in Finish Hard Turning, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 2007, 23, p 638–64410.1016/j.rcim.2007.02.008 ↗
6. W. Ji, X.L. Liu, H.Y. Li, H.Y. You, and M.C. Fan, Research of PCBN Tool Wear Mechanism in Turning Ni-based Superalloy, Adv. Mater. Res., 2013, 820, p 185–18910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.820.185 ↗
7. E. Bagci and S. Ayku, A Study of Taguchi Optimization Method for Identifying Optimum Surface Roughness in CNC Face Milling of Cobalt-Based Alloy (stellite 6), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2006, 29, p 940–94710.1007/s00170-005-2616-y ↗
8. M. Benghersallah, L. Boulanouar, G.L. Coz, A. Devillez, and D. Dudzinski, Machinability of Stellite 6 Hardfacing, EPJ Web Conf., 2010, 6, p 1–810.1051/epjconf/20100602001 ↗
9. S. Aykut, E. Bagci, A. Kentli, and O. Yazicioglu, Experimental Observation of Tool Wear, Cutting Forces and Chip Morphology in Face Milling of Cobalt Based Super-Alloy with Physical Vapor Deposition Coated and Uncoated Tool, Mater. Des., 2007, 28, p 1880–188810.1016/j.matdes.2006.04.014 ↗
10. S. Ozturk, Machinability of Stellite-6 Coatings with Ceramic Inserts and Tungsten Carbide Tools, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2014, 39, p 7375–738310.1007/s13369-014-1343-9 ↗
11. H. Shao, L. Li, L.J. Liu, and S.Z. Zhang, Study on Machinability of a Stellite Alloy with Uncoated and Coated Carbide Tools in Turning, J. Manuf. Process., 2013, 15, p 673–68110.1016/j.jmapro.2013.10.001 ↗
12. ASME B46.1: Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay), 2009
13. ISO 8688-2: Tool Life Testing in Milling—Part 2: End Milling, 1989.
14. ISO 4499-2: Hard Metals—Metallographic Determination of Microstructure, Part 2: Measurement of WC Grain Size, 2008
15. ISO 21608: Corrosion of Metals and Alloys—Test Method for Isothermal-Exposure Oxidation Testing Under High-temperature Corrosion Conditions for Metallic Materials, 2012
16. ISO 6507-1: Metallic Materials-Vickers Hardness Test. Part 1. Test method, 2010
17. G.S. Schajer, Non-uniform Residual Stress Measurements by the Hole Drilling Method, Strain, 1992, 28, p 19–2210.1111/j.1475-1305.1992.tb00784.x ↗
18. G.S. Schajer, Measurement of Non-Uniform Residual Stresses Using the Hole-Drilling Method. Part I—Stress Calculation Procedures, Trans. ASME, 1988, 110, p 338–343
19. ASTM E837-08: Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method, 2009
20. C. Robert, J. Adam, P. Jana, C. Lenka, S. Marek, and K. Jiri, Hard Machinable Machining of Cobalt Superalloys, Sci. Proc., 2012, 20, p 42–47
21. Durul Ulutan and Tugrul Ozel, Machining Induced Surface Integrity in Titanium and Nickel Alloys: A Review, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2011, 51, p 250–28010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.003 ↗
22. M.S. Hasan, A.M. Mazid, and R.E. Clegg, Optimization of the Machining of Stellite 6 PTA Hardfacing Using Surface Roughness, Key Eng. Mater., 2010, 443, p 227–23110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.443.227 ↗
23. F. Rosalbino and G. Scavino, Corrosion Behaviour Assessment of Cast and HIPed Stellite 6 Alloy in Achloride-Containing Environment, Electrochim. Acta, 2013, 111, p 656–662D10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.019 ↗
24. M. Mansori and M. Nouari, Dry Machinability of Nickel-Based Weld-Hardfacing Layers for Hot Tooling, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2007, 47, p 1715–172710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.12.007 ↗