journal article·2018-07

Influence of Particle Size on the Basic and Time-Dependent Rheological Behaviors of Cemented Paste Backfill

X. J. Deng, B. Klein, D. J. Hallbom, B. de Wit, J. X. Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

The rheological properties of cemented paste backfill (CPB) significantly influence the material’s transportability, and these properties are strongly affected by the material’s particle size. This paper mainly focuses on the influence of particles size on the basic and time-dependent rheological behaviors of CPB. The rheology tests and microstructure analysis were conducted using multiple CPB samples with different solid contents, cement contents, and particle sizes. Results show that the CPB samples with finer particle sizes have a lower apparent maximum packing density compared to the CPB samples with larger particle sizes. Fresh CPB mixture samples exhibit shear thinning characteristics which are more pronounced in samples with larger particle sizes and higher volume fraction to apparent maximum packing density ( $$\phi /\phi_{\text{m}}$$ ) ratios. When the $$\phi /\phi_{\text{m}}$$ ratio is lower than 0.875, the samples with finer particle sizes display a higher yield stress but less time-dependent rheological behavior than coarser samples. In all CPB samples that contained cement, the shear stress decreases first and then increases over the shearing time when samples are sheared at a constant shear rate. In the CPB samples without cement, samples with finer particle sizes show lower apparent viscosities, and it is observed in the sample with the finest particles that the shear stress only decreases over the shearing time. Moreover, it is found that the number of hydration products and the rate of particle sedimentation are both higher in samples with larger particle sizes, which result in these samples having higher apparent viscosities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tailings Management and Properties · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. F.P. Hassani, A. Mortazavi, and M. Shabani, An Investigation of Mechanisms Involved in Backfill-Rock Mass Behaviour in Narrow Vein Mining, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 2008, 108(8), p 463–471
2. E. Marnika, E. Christodoulou, and A. Xenidis, Sustainable Development Indicators for Mining Sites in Protected Areas: Tool Development, Ranking and Scoring of Potential Environmental Impacts and Assessment of Management Scenarios, J. Clean. Prod., 2015, 101(3), p 59–7010.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.098 ↗
3. Y. Huang, J. Li, T. Song, G. Kong, and M. Li, Analysis on Filling Ratio and Shield Supporting Pressure for Overburden Movement Control in Coal Mining with Compacted Backfilling, Energies, 2016, 10(1), p 3110.3390/en10010031 ↗
4. L. Festugato, A. Fourie, and N.C. Consoli, Cyclic Shear Response of Fibre-Reinforced Cemented Paste Backfill, Geotech. Lett., 2013, 3(1), p 5–1210.1680/geolett.12.00042 ↗
5. E. Yilmaz, T. Belem, B. Bussière, M. Mbonimpa, and M. Benzaazoua, Curing Time Effect on Consolidation Behaviour of Cemented Paste Backfill Containing Different Cement Types and Contents, Constr. Build. Mater., 2015, 75, p 99–11110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.008 ↗
6. A. Wu, Y. Wang, H. Wang, S. Yin, and X. Miao, Coupled Effects of Cement Type and Water Quality on the Properties of Cemented Paste Backfill, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2015, 143(10), p 65–7110.1016/j.minpro.2015.09.004 ↗
7. B.D. Thompson, W.F. Bawden, and M.W. Grabinsky, In Situ Measurements of Cemented Paste Backfill at the Cayeli Mine, Can. Geotech. J., 2012, 49(7), p 755–77210.1139/t2012-040 ↗
8. X.J. Deng, J.X. Zhang, N. Zhou, B. de Wit, and C.T. Wang, Upward Slicing Longwall-Roadway Cemented Backfilling Technology for Mining an Extra-Thick Coal Seam Located Under Aquifers: A Case Study, Environ. Earth Sci., 2017, 76(23), p 78910.1007/s12665-017-7120-9 ↗
9. J.P. Doherty, A. Hasan, G.H. Suazo, and A. Fourie, Investigation of Some Controllable Factors that Impact the Stress State in Cemented Paste Backfill, Can. Geotech. J., 2015, 52(12), p 1901–191210.1139/cgj-2014-0321 ↗
10. F. Cihangir, B. Ercikdi, A. Kesimal, A. Turan, and H. Deveci, Utilisation of Alkali-Activated Blast Furnace Slag in Paste Backfill of High-Sulphide Mill Tailings: Effect of Binder Type and Dosage, Miner. Eng., 2012, 30, p 33–4310.1016/j.mineng.2012.01.009 ↗
11. J. Haiqiang, M. Fall, and L. Cui, Yield Stress of Cemented Paste Backfill in Sub-zero Environments: Experimental Results, Miner. Eng., 2016, 92, p 141–15010.1016/j.mineng.2016.03.014 ↗
12. D.P. Bentz, C.F. Ferraris, M.A. Galler, A.S. Hansen, and J.M. Guynn, Influence of Particle Size Distributions on Yield Stress and Viscosity of Cement–Fly Ash Pastes, Cem. Concr. Res., 2012, 42(2), p 404–40910.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.006 ↗
13. C.F. Ferraris, K.H. Obla, and R. Hill, The Influence of Mineral Admixtures on the Rheology of Cement Paste and Concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 2001, 31, p 245–25510.1016/S0008-8846(00)00454-3 ↗
14. X. Deng, J. Zhang, B. Klein, N. Zhou, and B. de Wit, Experimental Characterization of the Influence of Solid Components on the Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Cemented Paste Backfill, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2017, 168, p 116–12510.1016/j.minpro.2017.09.019 ↗
15. D. Simon and M. Grabinsky, Apparent Yield Stress Measurement in Cemented Paste Backfill, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ., 2013, 27(4), p 231–25610.1080/17480930.2012.680754 ↗
16. D. Wu, M. Fall, and S.J. Cai, Coupling Temperature, Cement Hydration and Rheological Behaviour of Fresh Cemented Paste Backfill, Miner. Eng., 2013, 42, p 76–8710.1016/j.mineng.2012.11.011 ↗
17. X. Deng, B. Klein, L. Tong, and B. de Wit, Experimental Study on the Rheological Behavior of Ultra-Fine Cemented Backfill, Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 158(1), p 985–99410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.085 ↗
18. P.F.G. Banfill, Rheology of Fresh Cement and Concrete, Rheol. Rev., 2006, 2006, p 61–130
19. A. Chougnet, T. Palermo, A. Audibert, and M. Moan, Rheological Behaviour of Cement and Silica Suspensions: Particle Aggregation Modelling, Cem. Concr. Res., 2008, 38(11), p 1297–130110.1016/j.cemconres.2008.07.001 ↗
20. S.H. Lee, H.J. Kim, E. Sakai, and M. Daimon, Effect of Particle Size Distribution of Fly Ash–Cement System on the Fluidity of Cement Pastes, Cem. Concr. Res., 2003, 33(5), p 763–76810.1016/S0008-8846(02)01054-2 ↗
21. F. Mahaut, S. Mokéddem, X. Chateau, N. Roussel, and G. Ovarlez, Effect of Coarse Particle Volume Fraction on the Yield Stress and Thixotropy of Cementitious Materials, Cem. Concr. Res., 2008, 38(11), p 1276–128510.1016/j.cemconres.2008.06.001 ↗
22. N.A. Tregger, M.E. Pakula, and S.P. Shah, Influence of Clays on the Rheology of Cement Pastes, Cem. Concr. Res., 2010, 40(3), p 384–39110.1016/j.cemconres.2009.11.001 ↗
23. R.K. Dasari and R.E. Berson, The Effect of Particle Size on Hydrolysis Reaction Rates and Rheological Properties in Cellulosic Slurries, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2007, 136–140, p 289–300
24. F. Boylu, H. Dinçer, and G. Ateşok, Effect of Coal Particle Size Distribution, Volume Fraction and Rank on the Rheology of Coal–Water Slurries, Fuel Process. Technol., 2004, 85(4), p 241–25010.1016/S0378-3820(03)00198-X ↗
25. S. Khelifi, D. Fünfschilling, H.-Z. Li, and F. Lapicque, Rheology and Sedimentation Velocity of Alkaline Suspensions of Hematite Particles at Elevated Temperature, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., 2013, 70, p 233–24010.1016/j.cep.2013.03.016 ↗
26. D.M. Liu, Particle Packing and Rheological Property of Highly-Concentrated Ceramic Suspensions: ϕ m Determination and Viscosity Prediction, J. Mater. Sci., 2000, 35, p 5503–550710.1023/A:1004885432221 ↗
27. B.J. Maranzano and N.J. Wagner, The Effects of Particle Size on Reversible Shear Thickening of Concentrated Colloidal Dispersions, J. Chem. Phys., 2001, 114(23), p 1051410.1063/1.1373687 ↗
28. C. Chang and R.L. Powell, Effect of Particle Size Distributions on the Rheology of Concentrated Bimodal Suspensions, J. Rheol., 1994, 38(1), p 8510.1122/1.550497 ↗
29. J.C. van der Werff, Hard-Sphere Colloidal Dispersions: The Scaling of Rheological Properties with Particle Size, Volume Fraction, and Shear Rate, J. Rheol., 1999, 33(3), p 42110.1122/1.550062 ↗
30. E.O. Afoakwa, A. Paterson, and M. Fowler, Effects of Particle Size Distribution and Composition on Rheological Properties of Dark Chocolate, Eur. Food Res. Technol., 2008, 226(6), p 1259–126810.1007/s00217-007-0652-6 ↗
31. A.C.K. Sato and R.L. Cunha, Effect of Particle Size on Rheological Properties of Jaboticaba Pulp, J. Food Eng., 2009, 91(4), p 566–57010.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.005 ↗
32. T.A. Do, J.M. Hargreaves, B. Wolf, J. Hort, and J.R. Mitchell, Impact of Particle Size Distribution on Rheological and Textural Properties of Chocolate Models with Reduced Fat Content, J. Food Sci., 2007, 72(9), p E541–E55210.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00572.x ↗
33. D. Hallbom and B. Klein, A Physical Model for Yield Plastic Fluids, Part. Sci. Technol., 2009, 27(1), p 1–1510.1080/02726350802611275 ↗
34. D.J. Hallbom, Pipe Flow of Homogeneous Slurry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2008
35. R.Y. Yang, C.T. Jayasundara, A.B. Yu, and D. Curry, DEM Simulation of the Flow of Grinding Media in IsaMill, Miner. Eng., 2006, 19(10), p 984–99410.1016/j.mineng.2006.05.002 ↗
36. B. Klein, J.S. Laskowski, and S.J. Partridge, A New Viscometer for Rheological Measurements on Settling Suspensions, J. Rheol., 1995, 39(5), p 827–84010.1122/1.550620 ↗
37. H.A. Barnes, A Handbook of Elementary Rheology, Institute of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, 2000
38. L. Zhu, N. Sun, K. Papadopoulos, and D. De Kee, A Slotted Plate Device for Measuring Static Yield Stress, J. Rheol., 2001, 45(5), p 1105–112210.1122/1.1392299 ↗
39. Q.D. Nguyen and D.V. Boger, Application of Rheology to Solving Tailings Disposal Problems, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1998, 54, p 217–23310.1016/S0301-7516(98)00011-8 ↗
40. P.K. Senapati, B.K. Mishra, and A. Parida, Modeling of Viscosity for Power Plant Ash Slurry at Higher Concentrations: Effect of Solids Volume Fraction, Particle Size and Hydrodynamic Interactions, Powder Technol., 2010, 197(1–2), p 1–810.1016/j.powtec.2009.07.005 ↗
41. L. Huynh, D.A. Beattie, D. Fornasiero, and J. Ralston, Effect of Polyphosphate and Naphthalene Sulfonate Formaldehyde Condensate on the Rheological Properties of Dewatered Tailings and Cemented Paste Backfill, Miner. Eng., 2006, 19(1), p 28–3610.1016/j.mineng.2005.05.001 ↗
42. N. Roussel, Steady and Transient Flow Behaviour of Fresh Cement Pastes, Cem. Concr. Res., 2005, 35(9), p 1656–166410.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.001 ↗
43. P.F.G. Banfill and D.C. Sauders, On the Viscometric Examination of Cement Pastes, Cem. Concr. Res., 1981, 11, p 363–37010.1016/0008-8846(81)90108-3 ↗
44. S.B. Johnson, G.V. Franks, P.J. Scales, D.V. Boger, and T.W. Healy, Surface Chemistry–Rheology Relationships in Concentrated Mineral Suspensions, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2000, 58, p 267–30410.1016/S0301-7516(99)00041-1 ↗
45. X.J. Deng, B. Klein, J.X. Zhang, D. Hallbom, and B. de Wit, Time-Dependent Rheological Behaviour of Cemented Backfill Mixture, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ., 2018, 32(3), p 145–16210.1080/17480930.2016.1239305 ↗
46. D.D. Bui, J. Hu, and P. Stroeven, Particle Size Effect on the Strength of Rice Husk ash Blended Gap-Graded Portland Cement Concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2005, 27(3), p 357–36610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.05.002 ↗
47. F. Lange, H. Miirtel, and V. Rudert, Dense Packing of Cement Pastes and Resulting Consequences on Mortar Properties, Cem. Concr. Res., 1997, 27(10), p 1481–148810.1016/S0008-8846(97)00189-0 ↗
48. K.L. Scrivener and R.J. Kirkpatrick, Innovation in Use and Research on Cementitious Material, Cem. Concr. Res., 2008, 38(2), p 128–13610.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.025 ↗
49. G. Sant, C.F. Ferraris, and J. Weiss, Rheological Properties of Cement Pastes: A Discussion of Structure Formation and Mechanical Property Development, Cem. Concr. Res., 2008, 38(11), p 1286–129610.1016/j.cemconres.2008.06.008 ↗
50. S.-M. Lim, M.-C. Chae, N.-K. Kim, and B.-O. Park, Dielectric Properties of Ceramics (z = 0.4,0.6), Ceram. Int., 2003, 29(7), p 815–81910.1016/S0272-8842(03)00021-X ↗
51. A. Fall, H. de Cagny, D. Bonn, G. Ovarlez, E. Wandersman, J.A. Dijksman, and M. van Hecke, Rheology of Sedimenting Particle Pastes, J. Rheol., 2013, 57(4), p 123710.1122/1.4809732 ↗
52. G.C. Abade, B. Cichocki, M.L. Ekiel-Jezewska, G. Nagele, and E. Wajnryb, Diffusion, Sedimentation, and Rheology of Concentrated Suspensions of Core–Shell Particles, J. Chem. Phys., 2012, 136(10), p 10490210.1063/1.3689322 ↗
53. M. Fall, J.C. Célestin, and F.S. Han, Suitability of Bentonite-Paste Tailings Mixtures as Engineering Barrier Material for Mine Waste Containment Facilities, Miner. Eng., 2009, 22(9–10), p 840–84810.1016/j.mineng.2009.02.011 ↗
54. S.M. Olhero and J.M.F. Ferreira, Influence of Particle Size Distribution on Rheology and Particle Packing of Silica-Based Suspensions, Powder Technol., 2004, 139(1), p 69–7510.1016/j.powtec.2003.10.004 ↗
55. L. Alarcon-Ruiz, G. Platret, E. Massieu, and A. Ehrlacher, The Use of Thermal Analysis in Assessing the Effect of Temperature on a Cement Paste, Cem. Concr. Res., 2005, 35(3), p 609–61310.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.015 ↗
56. G. Ye, X. Liu, G. De Schutter, L. Taerwe, and P. Vandevelde, Phase Distribution and Microstructural Changes of Self-Compacting Cement Paste at Elevated Temperature, Cem. Concr. Res., 2007, 37(6), p 978–98710.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.011 ↗