Improving the Wear Behavior of WC-CoCr-based HVOF Coating by Surface Grinding
Source abstract
Abstract
WC-CoCr-based high velocity oxy fuel (HVOF) coatings are being used for several components which are prone to severe erosion or abrasion. In this study, the HVOF coating was applied by liquid fuel-based equipment. These coated samples were subjected to surface grinding of various depths (100, 200, and 300 μm). Hardness test after surface grinding showed that the coating hardness increased by 33% after grinding to a depth of 200 μm (1472 Hv). The residual stress after different depths of grinding was measured using x-ray diffraction. It showed that the compressive residual stress of coating increased with grinding. Increase in hardness of the coating (after grinding) is believed to be due to the increase in compressive residual stress. The abrasive wear resistance increased after grinding to a depth of 100 μm thickness and remained constant during successive grinding. In contrast, the erosive wear resistance increased the most when the grinding thickness was 200 μm. It is concluded that the surface grinding of coatings helps in increasing abrasive and erosive wear resistance. The increase in microhardness of the coating is believed to be the reason for high wear resistance. SEM studies of worn out surface show carbide grain pull out due to removal of softer phase, i.e. cobalt and chromium, and is followed by tungsten carbide grain pull out.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. T. J. DeMasi-Marcin, D. K. Gupta (1994) Surf Coat Technol 68/69 1.10.1016/0257-8972(94)90129-5 ↗
2. T. N. Rhys-Jones, Surf. Coat. Technol, 43/44 (1990) 402.10.1016/0257-8972(90)90092-Q ↗
3. B.S. Mann, V. Arya, Wear 249 (2001) 354.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00537-3 ↗
4. G. Barbezat, A.R. Nicoll, and D.A. Sickinger, Abrasion, Erosion and Scuffing Resistance of Carbide and Oxide Ceramic Thermal Sprayed Coatings for Different Applications, Wear, 1993, 162/164, p 52910.1016/0043-1648(93)90538-W ↗
5. A. Karimi, Ch. Verdon, and G. Barbezat, Microstructure and Hydroabrasive Wear Behaviour of High Velocity Oxy-Fuel Thermally Sprayed WC-Co(Cr) Coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol., 1993, 57, p 8110.1016/0257-8972(93)90340-T ↗
6. J.K.N. Murthy and B. Venkataraman, Surf. Coat. Techno., 200, 8, (2006) 2642.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.136 ↗
7. T. Sudaprasert, P.H. Shipway., D.G. McCartney, Wear 255 (2003) 943.10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00293-X ↗
8. D.A. Stewart, P.H. Shipway, D.G. McCartney, Wear 225/229 (1999) 789.10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00032-0 ↗
9. C. Monticelli, A. Frignani,F. Zucchi, Corros. Sci. 46 (2004) 1225.10.1016/j.corsci.2003.09.013 ↗
10. J.K.N. Murthy, D.S. Rao, B. Venkataraman, Wear 249 (2001) 592.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00682-2 ↗
11. D.W. Wheeler, R.J.K. Wood,. Wear 220 (1998) 95.10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.035 ↗
12. B.S. Mann., V. Arya, Wear 254 (2003) 652.10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00253-9 ↗
13. K. Sugiyama, S. Nakahama, S. Hattoric, K. Nakano. Wear 258 (2005) 768.10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.006 ↗
14. B. Wang, Z.R. Shui, J. Mat. Process. Technol, 143/144 (2003) 87.10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00326-1 ↗
15. A. K. Maiti, N. Mukhopadhyay,R. Raman, Surf. Coat. Techno. 201 (2007) 7781.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.03.014 ↗
16. M.R. James, J.B. Cohen, The measurement of residual stress by X-ray diffraction technique. In: Vol 19A, Academic Press, New York, (1980) 1.
17. X. Zhang, A. Misra, H. Wang, A.L. Lima, M.F. Hundley, R.G. Hoagland, J. Appl. Phys. 97, (2005) 094302.10.1063/1.1883724 ↗
18. D.W. Wheeler & R. J.K. Wood, Wear 258 (2005) 526.10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.035 ↗