Effect of Long-Term Service on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Martensitic 9% Cr Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper presents the results of research on the X10CrMoVNbN9-1 (T91) steel after long-term service. The material for testing was taken from a pipe section of a boiler superheater coil serviced for around 105,000 h at the temperature of 540 °C, at the pressure of 12.5 MPa. A quantitative analysis including the measurement of mean diameter of subgrains and precipitates as well as the density of dislocations of the examined steel was performed by means of TEM. The microscopic tests of T91 steel were complemented with the results of tests on mechanical properties which included also the short creep tests. After service, the investigated steel was characterized by a retained lath microstructure of tempered martensite with fine subgrain and quite large density of dislocations as well as numerous precipitates. In the microstructure, apart from the particles of M23C6 and MX (VX, NbC, V-wings), the precipitates of Laves phase and single particles of Z phase were revealed. It has been shown that the extent of degradation of the T91 steel microstructure was minor, which resulted from its low temperature of service. Performed tests of mechanical properties showed that these properties fulfilled the minimum requirements for this steel in the as-received condition. A favorable influence of fine precipitates of Laves phase on mechanical properties was observed. Moreover, an insignificant influence of single precipitates of Z phase on the creep resistance of the examined steel was stated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Iseda, M. Kubota, Y. Hayase, S. Yamamoto, and K. Yoshikawa, Sumitomo Search, 1988, 36, p 17–30
2. J. Hald, Int. J. Press. Vessel Pip., 2008, 85, p 30–3710.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.06.010 ↗
3. A. Orlova, J. Bursik, K. Kucharava, and V. Sklenicka, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1998, 245, p 39–4810.1016/S0921-5093(97)00708-9 ↗
4. J.H. Baek, S.H. Kim, C.B. Lee, and D.H. Hahn, Met. Mater. Int., 2009, 15, p 565–57310.1007/s12540-009-0565-y ↗
5. C.G. Panait, A. Zielińska-Lipiec, T. Kozieł, A. Czyrska-Filemonowicz, A.-F. Gourgues-Lorenzon, and W. Bendick, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 4062–406910.1016/j.msea.2010.03.010 ↗
6. G. Junak and M. Cieśla, Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2011, 48(1), p 19–24
7. Z.H. Wei, H. YiZh, Z. Hui, and C.Y. Wan, Int. J. Fatigue, 2013, 47, p 83–8910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.011 ↗
8. S. Mroziński and G. Golański, Mater. Res. Innov., 2014, 18, p 504–50810.1179/1432891714Z.000000000546 ↗
9. S. Spigarelli and E. Quadrini, Mater. Des., 2003, 23, p 547–55210.1016/S0261-3069(02)00026-2 ↗
10. H. Li and D. Mitchell, Steel Res. Int., 2013, 84(12), p 1302–130810.1002/srin.201300055 ↗
11. A. Zieliński, M. Miczka, B. Boryczko, and M. Sroka, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2016, 4, p 813–82410.1016/j.acme.2016.04.010 ↗
12. A. Zieliński, G. Golański, and M. Sroka, Kovove Mater., 2016, 54(1), p 61–7010.4149/km_2016_1_61 ↗
13. R.K. Ham, Philos. Mag., 1961, 6, p 1183–118410.1080/14786436108239679 ↗
14. G. Golański, A. Zielińska-Lipiec, S. Mroziński, and C. Kolan, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 627, p 106–11010.1016/j.msea.2014.12.120 ↗
15. A. Zieliński, G. Golański, M. Sroka, and J. Dobrzański, Mater. Sci. Technol. Lond., 2016, 32(8), p 780–78510.1179/1743284715Y.0000000137 ↗
16. H. Ghassemi-Armaki, R.P. Chen, K. Maruyama, M. Yoshizawa, and M. Igarashi, Mater. Lett., 2009, 63, p 2423–242510.1016/j.matlet.2009.08.024 ↗
17. L. Cipolla, S. Caminada, D. Venditti, H.K. Danielsen, and A. Di Gianfrancesco, in J. Lecomte-Beckers, Q. Contrepois, F. Kuhn, T. Beck (Eds.), Materials for Advanced Power Engineering, Belgium, 2010, p 270–283.
18. G. Gupta and G.S. Was, Metall, Mater. Trans., 2008, 39A, p 150–16410.1007/s11661-007-9411-3 ↗
19. M.S. Laws and P.J. Goodhew, Acta Metall., 1991, 39, p 1525–153310.1016/0956-7151(91)90238-V ↗
20. Y. Xu, X. Zhang, Y. Tian, C. Chen, Y. Nan, H. He, and M. Wang, Mater. Charact., 2016, 111, p 122–12710.1016/j.matchar.2015.11.023 ↗
21. J.S. Lee, H.G. Armaki, K. Maruyama, T. Muraki, and H. Asahi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 428, p 270–27510.1016/j.msea.2006.05.010 ↗
22. H.K. Danielsen and J. Hald, VGB PowerTech, 2009, 5, p 68–73
23. B.S. Srinivas Prasad, V.B. Rajkumar, and K.C. Hari Kumar, Calphad, 2012, 36, p 1–710.1016/j.calphad.2011.10.006 ↗
24. PN–EN 10216–2 Seamless Steel Tubes for Pressure Purposes—Technical Delivery Conditions. Part 2: Non-Alloy and Alloy Steel Tubes with Specified Elevated Temperature Properties.
25. J. Dobrzański, Materials Science Interpretation of the Life of Steels for Power Plants, Open Access Library 3, Gliwice, 2011
26. A. Zieliński, G. Golański, M. Sroka, and T. Tański, Mater. High Temp., 2016, 33(1), p 24–3210.1179/1878641315Y.0000000015 ↗
27. Q. Li, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, 361, p 385–39110.1016/S0921-5093(03)00565-3 ↗
28. K. Maruyama, K. Sawada, and J. Koike, ISIJ Int., 2001, 41, p 641–65310.2355/isijinternational.41.641 ↗
29. F. Abe, Metall, Mater. Trans., 2005, 36A, p 321–33210.1007/s11661-005-0305-y ↗
30. V.T. Paul, S. Saroja, and M. Vijayalakshmi, J. Mater. Nucl., 2008, 378, p 273–28110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.033 ↗
31. E. Plesiutschnig, C. Beal, S. Paul, G. Zeiler, and C. Sommitsch, Mater. High Temp., 2015, 32(3), p 318–32210.1179/0960340914Z.00000000073 ↗
32. G. Golański, A. Zieliński, J. Słania, and J. Jasak, Arch. Metall. Mater., 2014, 59, p 1357–136010.2478/amm-2014-0230 ↗