Influence of M-TIG and A-TIG Welding Process on Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of 409 Ferritic Stainless Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
The current study investigates the effects of activating flux tungsten inert gas welding (A-TIG) and multipass tungsten inert gas welding (M-TIG) on the weld morphology, angular distortion, microstructures and mechanical properties when welding 8-mm-thick 409 ferritic stainless steel (FSS). SiO2 was used as activating flux for A-TIG welding, while SUPERTIG ER309L was used as filler for M-TIG welding. Bead-on-plate weld trials were carried out to obtain the full penetration by using different combinations of flux coating density, welding speed and welding current. An optical microscope, field emission scanning microscope (FESEM), and x-ray diffractometer were used for the metallurgical characterizations. Vickers hardness, tensile test, Charpy toughness test, and creep behavior test were carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties of the base and weld metals. Experimental results indicate that the A-TIG process can increase the joint penetration and tends to reduce the angular distortion of the 409 FSS weldment. The A-TIG welded joint also exhibited greater mechanical strength. However, a critically low Charpy toughness was measured for the A-TIG weld fusion zone, which was later sufficiently improved after post weld heat treatment (PWHT). It was concluded that PWHT is mandatory for A-TIG welded 409 FSS.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. A.K. Lakshminarayanan and V. Balasubramanian, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2013, 22, p 229310.1007/s11665-013-0521-3 ↗
2. K. Prasad and D.K. Dwivedi, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2008, 23, p 46310.1080/10426910802103551 ↗
3. T.C. Scalise, M.C.L. de Oliveira, I.J. Sayeg, and R.A. Antunes, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23, p 216410.1007/s11665-014-1010-z ↗
4. D. Aidun and S. Martin, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1997, 6, p 49610.1007/s11665-997-0121-1 ↗
5. H.-Y. Huang, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2010, 41, p 282910.1007/s11661-010-0361-9 ↗
6. T.-S.S. Chern, K.-H.H. Tseng, and H.-L.L. Tsai, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 25510.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.056 ↗
7. T. Sakthivel, M. Vasudevan, K. Laha, P. Parameswaran, K.S.S. Chandravathi, M.D.D. Mathew, and A.K.K. Bhaduri, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2011, 528, p 697110.1016/j.msea.2011.05.052 ↗
8. H.Y. Huang, S.W. Shyu, K.H. Tseng, and C.P. Chou, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2005, 10, p 56610.1179/174329305X48329 ↗
9. M. Vasudevan, V. Arunkumar, N. Chandrasekhar, and V. Maduraimuthu, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2010, 15, p 11710.1179/136217109X12577814486773 ↗
10. M. Tanaka, T. Shimizu, T. Terasaki, M. Ushio, F. Koshi-ishi, H. Terasaki, M. Ushio, and C. Yang, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2000, 5, p 39710.1179/136217100101538461 ↗
11. A. Rodrigues and A. Loureiro, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2005, 10, p 76010.1179/174329305X68769 ↗
12. S. Leconte, P. Paillard, and J. Saindrenan, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2006, 11, p 4310.1179/174329306X77047 ↗
13. H.-Y. Huang, Mater. Des., 2009, 30, p 240410.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.024 ↗
14. V. Arunkumar, M. Vasudevan, V. Maduraimuthu, and V. Muthupandi, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2012, 27, p 117110.1080/10426914.2011.610212 ↗
15. P. Vasantharaja, V. Maduarimuthu, M. Vasudevan, and P. Palanichamy, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2012, 27, p 137610.1080/10426914.2012.663135 ↗
16. B. Arivazhagan and M. Vasudevan, J. Manuf. Process., 2014, 16, p 30510.1016/j.jmapro.2014.01.003 ↗
17. E. Ahmadi and A.R. Ebrahimi, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24, p 106510.1007/s11665-014-1336-6 ↗
18. R.S. Vidyarthy and D.K. Dwivedi, J. Manuf. Process., 2016, 22, p 21110.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.012 ↗
19. K.H. Tseng, Powder Technol., 2013, 233, p 7210.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.038 ↗
20. K.-H. Tseng and C.-Y. Hsu, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211, p 50310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.003 ↗
21. F. C. Hull, Weld. J., 1973, 52, p 193
22. M. Balmforth and J. Lippold, Weld. J., 2000, 79, p 339
23. R.D. Peelamedu, R. Roy, and D.K. Agrawal, Mater. Lett., 2002, 55, p 23410.1016/S0167-577X(01)00653-X ↗
24. S. Zafar and A.K. Sharma, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 370, p 9210.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.114 ↗
25. P. Mayr and H. Cerjak, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2010, 63, p 13110.1007/s12666-010-0018-9 ↗
26. C. Pandey and M.M. Mahapatra, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 276110.1007/s11665-016-2127-z ↗
27. R. A. Lula, Toughness of Ferritic Stainless Steels, STP 706 (ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, 1980)10.1520/STP706-EB ↗
28. R.A. Lula and J.A. Devis, Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTM STP, 1978, 6, p 233
29. J. C. Lippold and D. J. Kotecki, Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005), pp. 130–132
30. S. Anttila, P. Karjalainen, and S. Lantto, Weld. World, 2013, 57, p 335
31. C. Pandey and M.M. Mahapatra, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 219510.1007/s11665-016-2064-x ↗
32. M. Tamura, H. Esaka, and K. Shinozuka, Mater. Trans., 2003, 44, p 11810.2320/matertrans.44.118 ↗
33. H. Chiu, C. Kuo, and H. Wang, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2013, 302, p 25210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.302.252 ↗