journal article·2018-08

Compressive Properties and Energy Absorption of Aluminum Foams with a Wide Range of Relative Densities

Ying Cheng, Yanxiang Li, Xiang Chen, Xu Zhou, Ningzhen Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Quasi-static uniaxial compressive experiments were conducted on aluminum foams with a wide range of relative densities (0.134-0.472). The compressive properties and energy absorption capacity were systematically characterized and compared in a more suitable way. The compressive stress instead of compressive strain achieved during energy absorption process was taken into consideration. The results show that aluminum foam is not a kind of energy absorption materials with a stationary plateau region at the plastic deformation stage. There exists a strain hardening phenomenon which makes the stress–strain curve incline at this stage. For every aluminum foam with certain relative density, there exists an optimal stress. Under its optimal stress condition, the foam can absorb the maximum energy compared to foams with whatever different relative densities. The optimal stress and corresponding maximum energy absorption capacity increase with the increase in the foam’s relative density.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. A.G. Evans, J.W. Hutchinson, and M.F. Ashby, Multifunctionality of Cellular Metal Systems, Prog. Mater. Sci., 1999, 43, p 171–22110.1016/S0079-6425(98)00004-8 ↗
2. W. Yuan, Y. Li, and X. Chen, Improving Sound Absorption of Aluminum Foams by Drilling Holes, Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 2011, 21(1), p 138–144
3. Z. Xu and H. Hao, Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Effectiveness of Aluminum Foams with Different Porosity, J. Alloys Compd., 2014, 617, p 207–21310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.188 ↗
4. X. Zhu, S. Ai, X. Lu, X. Ling, L. Zhu, and B. Liu, Thermal Conductivity of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam Based on the 3D Geometrical Reconstruction, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2014, 72, p 242–24910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.01.006 ↗
5. L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 199710.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
6. R. Edwin Raj and B.S.S. Daniel, Structural and Compressive Property Correlation of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam, J. Alloys Compd., 2009, 467, p 550–55610.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.040 ↗
7. T. Miyoshi, M. Itoh, T. Mukai, H. Kanahashi, H. Kohzu, S. Tanabe, and K. Higashi, Enhancement of Energy Absorption in a Closed-Cell Aluminum by the Modification of Cellular Structures, Scr. Mater., 1999, 41(10), p 1055–106010.1016/S1359-6462(99)00255-9 ↗
8. Y.P. Jeon, C.G. Kang, and S.M. Lee, Effects of Cell Size on Compression and Bending Strength of Aluminum-Foamed Material by Complex Stirring in Induction Heating, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209, p 435–44410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.017 ↗
9. V.K. Jeenager and V. Pancholi, Influence of Cell Wall Microstructure on the Energy Absorption Capability of Aluminum Foam, Mater. Des., 2014, 56, p 454–45910.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.109 ↗
10. J. Kadkhodapour and S. Raeisi, Micro-macro Investigation of Deformation and Failure in Closed-Cell Aluminum Foams, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2014, 83, p 137–14810.1016/j.commatsci.2013.10.017 ↗
11. U. Ramamurty and A. Paul, Variability in Mechanical Properties of a Metal Foam, Acta Mater., 2004, 52, p 869–87610.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.021 ↗
12. A. Paul and U. Ramamurty, Strain Rate Sensitivity of a Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 281, p 1–710.1016/S0921-5093(99)00750-9 ↗
13. Y. Mu, G. Yao, L. Liang, H. Luo, and G. Zu, Deformation Mechanisms of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foams in Compression, Scr. Mater., 2010, 63, p 629–63210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.041 ↗
14. C.M. Cady, G.T. Gray, III, C. Liu, M.L. Lovato, and T. Mukai, Compressive Properties of a Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam as a Function of Strain Rate and Temperature, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 525, p 1–610.1016/j.msea.2009.07.007 ↗
15. S.L. Lopatnikov, B.A. Gama, and J.W. Gillespie, Jr., Modeling the Progressive Collapse Behavior of Metal Foams, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2007, 34, p 587–59510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.12.004 ↗
16. Z. Fan, B. Zhang, Y. Gao, X. Guan, and P. Xu, Deformation Mechanisms of Spherical Cell Porous Aluminum Under Quasi-Static Compression, Scr. Mater., 2018, 142, p 32–3510.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.019 ↗
17. S. Pal, S. Maiti, and G. Subhash, Effect of Microscopic Deformation Mechanisms on the Dynamic Response of Soft Cellular Materials, Mech. Mater., 2010, 42, p 118–13310.1016/j.mechmat.2009.11.014 ↗
18. J. Banhart, Manufacture, Characterization and Application of Cellular Metals and Metal Foams, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2001, 46, p 559–63210.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
19. J. Banhart, Light-Metal Foams-History of Innovation and Technological Challenges, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2013, 15(3), p 82–11110.1002/adem.201200217 ↗
20. T. Miyoshi, M. Itoh, S. Akiyama, and A. Kitahara, ALPORAS Aluminum Foam: Production Process, Properties, and Applications, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2000, 2(4), p 179–18310.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200004)2:4<179::AID-ADEM179>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
21. L.J. Gibson, Mechanical Behavior of Metallic Foams, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 2000, 30, p 191–22710.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.191 ↗
22. W. Jang, W. Hsieh, C. Miao, and Y. Yen, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of ALPORAS Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam, Mater. Charact., 2015, 107, p 228–23810.1016/j.matchar.2015.07.012 ↗
23. H. Yu, Z. Guo, B. Li, G. Yao, H. Luo, and Y. Liu, Research into the Effect of Cell Diameter of Aluminum Foam on Its Compressive and Energy Absorption Properties, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 454–455, p 542–54610.1016/j.msea.2006.11.091 ↗
24. X. Xia, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, X. Chen, W. Zhao, B. Liao, and B. Hur, Compressive Properties of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foams with Different Contents of Ceramic Microspheres, Mater. Des., 2014, 56, p 353–35810.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.040 ↗
25. X. Liu, J. Zhang, Q. Fang, H. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Response of Closed-Cell Aluminum Foams Under Static and Impact Loading: Experimental and Mesoscopic Numerical Analysis, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2016, 110, p 382–39410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.004 ↗
26. Y. Cheng, Y. Li, X. Chen, T. Shi, Z. Liu, and N. Wang, Fabrication of Aluminum Foams with Small Pore Size by Melt Foaming Method, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2017, 48, p 754–76210.1007/s11663-016-0815-6 ↗
27. V.S. Deshpande and N.A. Flect, Isotropic Constitutive Models for Metallic Foams, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2000, 48, p 1253–128310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
28. Q.M. Li, I. Magkiriadis, and J.J. Harrigan, Compressive Strain at the Onset of Densification of Cellular Solids, J. Cell. Plast., 2016, 42, p 371–39210.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗