Effect of Martensite Morphology on Tensile Deformation of Dual-Phase Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Three morphologies of martensite in dual-phase microstructure of 0.2% C steel were obtained by different heat treatment cycles. These morphologies consisting of grain boundary growth, scattered laths, and bulk form of martensite have their distinct patterns of distribution in the matrix (ferrite). In tensile testing martensite particles with these distributions behaved differently. A reasonable work hardening was gained initially during plastic deformation of the specimens. The control on ductility was found to depend on the alignment of martensite particles along the tensile axes. The increased surface area contact of martensite particles with ferrite, in grain boundary growth and scattered lath morphologies, facilitated stress transfer from ductile to hard phase. The ductility in the later part of deformation was dependent on the density of microvoids in the necked region. The microvoids are formed mostly by de-cohesion of martensite particles at the interface. The fracture of martensite particles is less prominent in the process of microvoid formation which predicts high strength of martensite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. M.S. Rashid, Relationship Between Steel Microstructure and Formability, Formable HSLA and Dual-Phase Steels, A.T. Davenport, Ed., AIME, New York, 1977, p 1–24
2. G.R. Speich and R.L. Miller, Mechanical Properties of Ferrite-Martensite Steels, Structure and Properties of Dual Phase Steels, A.T. Davenport, Ed., TMS-AIME, New York (NY), 1979, p 145–182
3. S.S. Hansen and R.R. Pradhan, Structure/Property Relationship and Continuous Yielding Behavior in Dual-Phase Steels, Proceedings Fundamentals of Dual-Phase Steels, R.A. Kot and B.L. Bramfitt, Ed., AIME, New York, 1981, p 113–144
4. N.K. Balliger and T. Gladman, Work Hardening of Dual-Phase Steels, Met. Sci., 1981, 15(3), p 95–10810.1179/030634581790426615 ↗
5. E. Ahmad, T. Mazoor, N. Hussain, and N.K. Qazi, Effect of Thermomechanical Processing on Hardenability and Tensile Fracture of Dual-Phase Steel, Mater. Des., 2008, 29, p 450–45710.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.022 ↗
6. M. Sarwar and R. Priestner, Influence of Ferrite-Martensite Microstructural Morphology on Tensile Properties of Dual-Phase Steel, J. Mater. Sci., 1996, 31, p 2091–209510.1007/BF00356631 ↗
7. E. Ahmad, T. Mazoor, and N. Hussain, Thermomechanical Processing in the Intercritical Region and Tensile Properties of Dual Phase-Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 508, p 259–26510.1016/j.msea.2009.01.056 ↗
8. K.S. Park, K.T. Park, D.L. Lee, and C.S. Lee, Effect of Heat Treatment Path on the Cold Formability of Drawn Dual-Phase Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 449–451, p 1135–113810.1016/j.msea.2006.02.243 ↗
9. M. Sarwar, T. Manzoor, E. Ahmad, and N. Hussain, The Role of Connectivity of Martensite on Tensile Properties of a Low Alloy Steel, Mater. Des., 2007, 28, p 1928–193310.1016/j.matdes.2006.05.010 ↗
10. M. Erdogan and S. Tekeli, The Effect of Martensite Particle Size on Tensile Fracture of Surface Carburized AISI, 8620 Steel with Dual Phase Core Microstructure, Mater. Des., 2002, 23, p 597–60410.1016/S0261-3069(02)00065-1 ↗
11. S. Sun and M. Pugh, Properties of Thermomechanically Processed Dual-Phase Steels Containing Fibrous Martensite, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2002, 335(1–2), p 298–30810.1016/S0921-5093(01)01942-6 ↗
12. M. Sarwar and R. Priestner, Hardenability of Austenite in a Dual-Phase Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1999, 8(3), p 380–38410.1361/105994999770346954 ↗
13. E. Ahmad and R. Priestner, Effect of Rolling in the Intercritical Region on the Tensile Properties of Dual-Phase Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1998, 7(6), p 772–77610.1361/105994998770347341 ↗
14. G.R. Speich, V.A. Demarest, and R.L. Miller, Formation of Austenite During Intercritical Annealing of Dual-Phase Steels, Metall. Trans. A, 1981, 12, p 1419–142810.1007/BF02643686 ↗
15. C.L. Magee and R.G. Davies, On the Volume Expansion Accompanying the fcc and bcc Transformation in Ferrous Alloys, Acta Metall., 1972, 20, p 1031–104310.1016/0001-6160(72)90137-X ↗
16. J.M. Moyer and G.S. Ansell, The Volume Expansion Accompanying the Martensite Transformation in Iron-Carbon Alloys, Metall. Trans. A, 1975, 6, p 1785–179110.1007/BF02642308 ↗
17. J. Gerbase, J.D. Embury, and R.M. Hobbs, The Mechanical Behavior of Some Dual Phase Steels with Emphasis on the Initial Work Hardening Rate, Structures and Properties of Dual Phase Steels, R.A. Kot and J.W. Morris, Ed., TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1979, p 118–143
18. J.M. Rigsbee and P.J. VaderArendm, Laboratory Studies of Microstructures and Structure-Property Relationships in “Dual Phase” HSLA Steels, Formable HSLA and Dual-Phase Steels, A.T. Davenport, Ed., AIME, New York, 1977, p 56–86
19. D.L. Steinbrunner, D.K. Matlock, and G. Krauss, Void Formation During Tensile Testing of Dual-Phase Steels, Metall. Trans. A, 1988, 19, p 579–58910.1007/BF02649272 ↗