Effect of Shoulder Size on Weld Properties of Dissimilar Metal Friction Stir Welds
Source abstract
Abstract
This article reports a research study that shows the effect of shoulder diameter size on the resulting weld properties of dissimilar friction stir welds between 5754 aluminum alloy (AA) and C11000 copper (Cu). Welds were produced using three different shoulder diameter tools: 15, 18, and 25 mm by varying the rotational speed between 600 and 1200 rpm and the traverse speed between 50 and 300 mm/min to achieve the best result. Each parameter combination was chosen to represent different heat input conditions (low, intermediates and high). The welds were characterized through microstructural evaluation, tensile testing, microhardness measurements, x-ray diffraction analysis, and electrical resistivity. Microstructural evaluation of the welds revealed that the welds produced consisted of all the friction stir welding (FSW) microstructure zones with organized flow lines comprising mixture layers of aluminum (Al) and copper (Cu) at the Stir Zones. The average Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of the welds considered ranged from 178 to 208 MPa. Higher Vickers microhardness values were measured at the joint interfaces of all the welds because of the presence of intermetallic compounds in these regions. The x-ray diffraction analysis revealed the presence of Al4Cu9 and Al2Cu intermetallics at the interfacial regions, and low electrical resistivities were obtained at the joint interfaces. An optimized parameter setting for FSW of Al and Cu was obtained at the weld produced at 950 rpm and 50 mm/min with the 18-mm shoulder diameter tool.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. W.M. Thomas, E.D. Nicholas, J.C. Needham, M.G. Murch, P. Templesmith, and C.J. Dawes, Friction Stir Welding. International Patent Application, G.B.9125978.8 (Patent), December 1991, Friction Stir Welding and Processing, R.S. Mishra, M.W. Mahoney, R.S. Mishra, and M.W. Mahoney, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2007, p 1
2. T. Shinoda, H. Tokisue, and M. Enomoto, Recent Trends of Research and Development of FSW Technology in Japan, 3rd International FSW Symposium, September 27–28, 2001 (Kobe, Japan), TWI, 2001. Retrieved: CD-ROM
3. P.L. Threadgill, Terminology in Friction Stir Welding, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2007, 12(4), p 357–36010.1179/174329307X197629 ↗
4. R. Nandan, T. DebRoy, and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Recent Advances in Friction Stir Welding—Process, Weldment Structure and Properties, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2008, 53, p 980–102310.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.05.001 ↗
5. K. Kumar and S.V. Kailas, The Role of Friction Stir Welding Tool on Material Flow and Weld Formation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 485, p 367–37410.1016/j.msea.2007.08.013 ↗
6. A.P. Reynolds, W.D. Lockwood, and T.U. Seidel, Processing-Property Correlation in Friction Stir Welds, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, ISSN 0255-547610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.331-337.1719 ↗
7. E.T. Akinlabi, A. Els-Botes, and H. Lombard, Effect of Tool Displacement on Defect Formation in Friction Stir Welding of Aluminium and Copper, 8th Int. FSW Symposium, May 18–20, 2010 (Hamburg, Germany), 2010
8. K. Elangovan and V. Balasubramanian, Influences of Tool Pin Profile and Tool Shoulder Diameter on the Formation of Friction Stir Processing Zone in AA6061 Aluminium Alloy, J. Mater. Des., 2008, 29, p 362–37310.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.030 ↗
9. Z. Zhang, Y.L. Liu, and J.T. Chen, Effect of Shoulder Size on the Temperature Rise and the Material Deformation in Friction Stir Welding, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2009, 45, p 889–89510.1007/s00170-009-2034-7 ↗
10. M. Braunović and N. Alexandrov, Intermetallic Compounds at Aluminium-to-Copper Electrical Interfaces: Effect of Temperature and Electric Current, IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Manuf. Technol. A, 1994, 17(1), p 78–8510.1109/95.296372 ↗
11. H. Kim, Y.J. Lee, K. Koh, J. Won, S. Choe, J. Lee, J. Moon, and Y. Park, Effects of Cu/Al Intermetallic Compound on Copper Wire and Aluminium Pad Bondability, IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Technol., 2003, 26, p 367–37410.1109/TCAPT.2003.815121 ↗
12. J. Ouyang, E.C. Yarrapareddy, and R. Kovacevic, Microstructural Evolution in the Friction Stir Welded 6061 Aluminium Alloy (T6-Temper Condition) to Copper, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 172, p 110–12210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.013 ↗
13. P. Vilaça, L. Quintino, J.F. dos Santos, R. Zettler, and S. Sheikhi, Quality Assessment of Friction Stir Welding Joints via an Analytical Thermal Model, iSTIR, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 445–446, p 501–50810.1016/j.msea.2006.09.091 ↗
14. M. Clifford, Ed., ASME Engineers Data Book, 2 ed., ASME, New York, 2005, p 169