Tensile, Creep, and Fatigue Behaviors of 3D-Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene
Source abstract
Abstract
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a widely used thermoplastics in 3D printing. However, there is a lack of thorough investigation of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS components, including orientation-dependent tensile strength and creep fatigue properties. In this work, a systematic characterization is conducted on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS components. Specifically, the effect of printing orientation on the tensile and creep properties is investigated. The results show that, in tensile tests, the 0° printing orientation has the highest Young’s modulus of 1.81 GPa, and ultimate strength of 224 MPa. In the creep test, the 90° printing orientation has the lowest k value of 0.2 in the plastics creep model, suggesting 90° is the most creep resistant direction. In the fatigue test, the average cycle number under load of 30 N is 3796 cycles. The average cycle number decreases to 128 cycles when the load is 60 N. Using the Paris law, with an estimated crack size of 0.75 mm, and stress intensity factor is varied from 352 to 700 $$N\sqrt m$$ , the derived fatigue crack growth rate is 0.0341 mm/cycle. This study provides important mechanical property data that is useful for applying 3D-printed ABS in engineering applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylonitrile_butadiene_styrene . Accessed August 31, 2017.
2. 3D Printer Materials Guide. https://3dprinting.com/materials/ . Accessed August 31, 2017.
3. P. Kumar, I. Ahuja, and R. Singh, Application of Fusion Deposition Modelling for Rapid Investment Casting—A Review, International Journal of Materials Engineering Innovation, 2012, 3(3–4), p 204–22710.1504/IJMATEI.2012.049254 ↗
4. A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, and S.S. Mahapatra, Experimental Investigation and Empirical Modelling of FDM Process for Compressive Strength Improvement, Journal of Advanced Research, 2012, 3(1), p 81–9010.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001 ↗
5. Cai, L., et al., Effect of Printing Orientation on Strength of 3D Printed ABS Plastics. In TMS 2016: 145th Annual Meeting & Exhibition: Supplemental Proceedings. 2016, Wiley, pp. 199–204.10.1002/9781119274896.ch25 ↗
6. Brindley, P., et al., Preliminary Investigation into the Mechanical Properties of Stratasys Polycarbonate and M30 ABS Materials. 2008, Loughborough University.
7. Hossain, M.S., et al. Improving Tensile Mechanical Properties of FDM-Manufactured Specimens Via Modifying Build Parameters. in International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium: An Additive Manufacturing Conference. Austin, TX. 2013.
8. J.P. Moore and C.B. Williams, Fatigue Properties of Parts Printed by PolyJet Material Jetting, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2015, 21(6), p 675–68510.1108/RPJ-03-2014-0031 ↗
9. ASTM D638-14, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
10. Stratasys, CatalystEx. 2015, Stratasys.
11. B.M. Tymrak, M. Kreiger, and J.M. Pearce, Mechanical Properties of Components Fabricated With Open-Source 3-D Printers Under Realistic Environmental Conditions, Materials & Design, 2014, 58, p 242–24610.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
12. Bagsik, A., V. Schöppner, and E. Klemp, FDM Part Quality Manufactured with Ultem*9085 in Polymeric Materials. 2010.
13. N.E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 4th ed., Pearson, London, 2012