journal article·2010-11

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Glass-Fiber Epoxy-Matrix Composite 5 MW Horizontal-Axis Wind-Turbine Blades

M. Grujicic, G. Arakere, B. Pandurangan, V. Sellappan, A. Vallejo, M. Ozen

Publisher page

Abstract

A multi-disciplinary design-optimization procedure has been introduced and used for the development of cost-effective glass-fiber reinforced epoxy-matrix composite 5 MW horizontal-axis wind-turbine (HAWT) blades. The turbine-blade cost-effectiveness has been defined using the cost of energy (CoE), i.e., a ratio of the three-blade HAWT rotor development/fabrication cost and the associated annual energy production. To assess the annual energy production as a function of the blade design and operating conditions, an aerodynamics-based computational analysis had to be employed. As far as the turbine blade cost is concerned, it is assessed for a given aerodynamic design by separately computing the blade mass and the associated blade-mass/size-dependent production cost. For each aerodynamic design analyzed, a structural finite element-based and a post-processing life-cycle assessment analyses were employed in order to determine a minimal blade mass which ensures that the functional requirements pertaining to the quasi-static strength of the blade, fatigue-controlled blade durability and blade stiffness are satisfied. To determine the turbine-blade production cost (for the currently prevailing fabrication process, the wet lay-up) available data regarding the industry manufacturing experience were combined with the attendant blade mass, surface area, and the duration of the assumed production run. The work clearly revealed the challenges associated with simultaneously satisfying the strength, durability and stiffness requirements while maintaining a high level of wind-energy capture efficiency and a lower production cost.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wind Energy Research and Development · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. 20% Wind Energy by 2030, Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply, DOE/GO-102008-2567, July 2008. http://www.osti.gov/bridge
2. D.A. Griffin, Evaluation of Design Concepts for Adaptive Wind Turbine Blades, SAND2004-2424, Sandia National Laboratories, 200210.2172/801399 ↗
3. P. Brondsted, H. Lilholt, and A. Lystrup, Composite Materials for Wind Power Turbine Blades, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2005, 35, p 505–53810.1146/annurev.matsci.35.100303.110641 ↗
4. D.A. Griffin, WindPact Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area-1-Composite Blades for 80- to 120-Meter Rotor, NREL/SR-500-29492, NREL, Washington, 200110.2172/783406 ↗
5. M. Grujicic, V. Sellappan, G. Arakere, J.C. Zeigert, K.Y. Kocer, and D. Schmueser, Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimization of a Composite Car Door for Structural Performance, NVH, Crashworthiness, Durability and Manufacturability, Multidis. Model. Mater. Struct., 2009, 5, p 1–28
6. MATLAB, The Language of Technical Computing, 7th ed., The MathWorks Inc., MA, 2006
7. M. Grujicic, G. Arakere, E. Subramanian, V. Sellappan, A. Vallejo, and M. Ozen, Structural-Response Analysis, Fatigue-Life Prediction, and Material Selection for 1 MW Horizontal-Axis Wind-Turbine Blades, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2009. doi: 10.1007/s11665-009-9558-810.1007/s11665-009-9558-8 ↗
8. M. Hepperle, JavaFoil Users Manual, 2005. http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/javafoil.htm
9. M.S. Selig and J.L. Tangler, A Multipoint Inverse Design Method for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines, AWEA Windpower Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2004
10. IEC-61400-3 (2009-02) Wind Turbines—Part 3, Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines Maintenance Result Date, p 201
11. ABAQUS/Standard Version 6.8-1, User Documentation, Dassault Systemes, 2008
12. M. Matsuiski and T. Endo, Fatigue of Metals Subjected to Varying Stress, Japan Soc. Mech. Eng., 1969
13. J. Goodman, Mechanics Applied to Engineering, Longman, Green, & Co, London, 1899
14. M.A. Miner, Cumulative Damage in Fatigue, J. Appl. Mech., 1945, 12, p A159–A16410.1115/1.4009458 ↗
15. A.A. Ten Have, WISPER and WISPERX: Final Definition of Two Standardized Fatigue Loading Sequences for Wind Turbine Blades, NLR-TP-91476U, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992