Measuring the Impact of Infill Pattern and Infill Density on the Properties of 3D-Printed PLA via FDM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. M.T. Birosz, D. Ledenyák, and M. Andó, Effect of FDM Infill Patterns on Mechanical Properties, Polym Test, 2022, 113.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107654 ↗
2. D. Rahmatabadi, M. Khajepour, A. Bayati, K. Mirasadi, M. Amin Yousefi, A. Shegeft, I. Ghasemi, M. Baniassadi, K. Abrinia, M. Bodaghi, and M. Baghani, Advancing Sustainable Shape Memory Polymers through 4D Printing of Polylactic Acid-Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate Blends, Eur. Polym. J.Polym. J., 2024, 216, p 113289.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113289 ↗
3. T.A. Son, P.S. Minh, and T. Do Thanh, Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on the Tensile Strength of Products, Key Eng. Mater. Eng. Mater., 2020, 863, p 103–108. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.863.10310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.863.103 ↗
4. U.K. Komal, B.K. Kasaudhan, and I. Singh, Comparative Performance Analysis of Polylactic Acid Parts Fabricated by 3D Printing and Injection Molding, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. Eng. Perform, 2021, 30(9), p 6522–6528.10.1007/s11665-021-05889-9 ↗
5. A. Tsouknidas, M. Pantazopoulos, I. Katsoulis, D. Fasnakis, S. Maropoulos, and N. Michailidis, Impact Absorption Capacity of 3D-Printed Components Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling, Mater. Des., 2016, 102, p 41–44.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.154 ↗
6. M. Qamar Tanveer, G. Mishra, S. Mishra, and R. Sharma, Effect of Infill Pattern and Infill Density on Mechanical Behaviour of FDM 3D Printed Parts- a Current Review, Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 62, p 100–108.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310 ↗
7. N. Shahrubudin, T.C. Lee, and R. Ramlan, An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Mater. Appl. Proc. Manuf., 2019, 35, p 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.08910.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089 ↗
8. Y. Yang, X. Dai, B. Yang, P. Zou, F. Gao, J. Duan, and C. Wang, Optimization of Polylactic Acid 3D Printing Parameters Based on Support Vector Regression and Cuckoo Search, Polym. Eng. Sci. Eng. Sci., 2023, 63(10), p 3243–3253.10.1002/pen.26440 ↗
9. A.R. Prajapati, S.R. Rajpurohit, N.H. Patadiya, and H.K. Dave, Analysis of Compressive Strength of 3D Printed PLA Part, Adv. Manuf. Process. Lecture Notes Mech. Eng., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9117-4_2210.1007/978-981-15-9117-4_22 ↗
10. Md. Qamar Tanveer, A. Haleem, and M. Suhaib, Effect of Variable Infill Density on Mechanical Behaviour of 3-D Printed PLA Specimen: An Experimental Investigation, SN Appl. Sci., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1744-110.1007/s42452-019-1744-1 ↗
11. G. Ćwikła, C. Grabowik, K. Kalinowski, I. Paprocka, and P. Ociepka, The Influence of Printing Parameters on Selected Mechanical Properties of FDM/FFF 3D-Printed Parts, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, 227(1), p 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/01203310.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012033 ↗
12. C. Tang, J. Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, S. Jiang, and W. Hao, Effect of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed PLA Lattice Structures, Compos. Part C: Open Access, 2020, 3, p 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10007610.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100076 ↗
13. T. Fadhil Abbas, H. Basil Ali, and K. Kadhim Mansor, Influence of FDM Process Variables’ On Tensile Strength, Weight, and Actual Printing Time When Using Abs Filament, Int. J. Modern Manuf. Technol., 2022, 14(1), p 7–13.
14. A. Çelebi, Experimental and Statistical Investigation of the Bending and Surface Roughness Properties on Three-Dimensional Printing Parts, J. Test. Eval. Eval., 2022, 50(4), p 2069–2082. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE2021068210.1520/JTE20210682 ↗
15. M. Kukla, I. Sieracki, W. Maliga, and J. Górecki, Compression Strength of PLA Bolts Produced via FDM, Materials, 2022, 15(24), p 8740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1524874010.3390/ma15248740 ↗
16. S.-M. Lai and P.-W. Li, Effect of Thermoplastic Polyurethane-Modified Silica on Melt-Blended Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA) Nanocomposites, Polym. Polym. Compos.. Polym. Compos., 2017, 25(8), p 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911170250080310.1177/096739111702500803 ↗
17. Q. Ma, M.R.M. Rejab, A.P. Kumar, H. Fu, N.M. Kumar, and J. Tang, Effect of Infill Pattern, Density and Material Type of 3D Printed Cubic Structure under Quasi-Static Loading, Proc. Ins. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2021, 235(19), p 4254–4272.10.1177/0954406220971667 ↗
18. B. Pernet, J.K. Nagel, and H. Zhang, Compressive Strength Assessment of 3D Printing Infill Patterns, Procedia CIRP, 2022, 105, p 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.11410.1016/j.procir.2022.02.114 ↗
19. A. Pandzic, D. Hodzic, and A. Milovanovic, Effect of Infill Type and Density on Tensile Properties of PLA Material for FDM Process, Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium, Danube Adria Association for Automation and Manufacturing, DAAAM, 2019, p 0545–0554, https://doi.org/10.2507/30th.daaam.proceedings.074.10.2507/30th.daaam.proceedings.074 ↗
20. M. Moradi, A. Aminzadeh, D. Rahmatabadi, and A. Hakimi, Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed PLA Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Mater. Res Exp., 2021, 8(3), p 035304. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abe8f310.1088/2053-1591/abe8f3 ↗
21. A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, Effect of Print Speed and Extrusion Temperature on Properties of 3D Printed PLA Using Fused Deposition Modeling Process, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 45, p 5462–5468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.13710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.137 ↗
22. L. Marsavina, C. Vălean, M. Mărghitas, E. Linul, N. Razavi, F. Berto, and R. Brighenti, Effect of the Manufacturing Parameters on the Tensile and Fracture Properties of FDM 3D-Printed PLA Specimens, Eng Fract Mech, 2022, 274.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108766 ↗
23. M.M. Hanon, R. Marczis, and L. Zsidai, Influence of the 3D Printing Process Settings on Tensile Strength of PLA and HT-PLA, Period. Polytech. Mech. Eng. Budapest Univ. Technol. Econ., 2021, 65(1), p 38–46.10.3311/PPme.13683 ↗
24. H. Bakhtiari, M. Nikzad, and M. Tolouei-Rad, Influence of Three-Dimensional Printing Parameters on Compressive Properties and Surface Smoothness of Polylactic Acid Specimens, Polymers, 2023, 15(18), p 3827. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1518382710.3390/polym15183827 ↗
25. H. Gonabadi, Y. Chen, A. Yadav, and S. Bull, Investigation of the Effect of Raster Angle, Build Orientation, and Infill Density on the Elastic Response of 3D Printed Parts Using Finite Element Microstructural Modeling and Homogenization Techniques, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 118(5–6), p 1485–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07940-410.1007/s00170-021-07940-4 ↗
26. N. Vidakis, C. David, M. Petousis, D. Sagris, N. Mountakis, and A. Moutsopoulou, The Effect of Six Key Process Control Parameters on the Surface Roughness, Dimensional Accuracy, and Porosity in Material Extrusion 3D Printing of Polylactic Acid: Prediction Models and Optimization Supported by Robust Design Analysis, Adv. Indus. Manuf. Eng., 2022, 5, p 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2022.10010410.1016/j.aime.2022.100104 ↗
27. L. Sandanamsamy, J. Mogan, K. Rajan, W.S.W. Harun, I. Ishak, F.R.M. Romlay, and K. Kadirgama, Effect of Process Parameter on Tensile Properties of FDM Printed PLA, Mater. Today: Proc., 2024, 109, p 1–6.
28. Y. Yang, Y. Liu, W. Hao, G. Guo, and X. Cheng, Study on the Fracture Toughness of 3D Printed Engineering Plastics, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31(4), p 2889–2895.10.1007/s11665-021-06439-z ↗
29. M. Moradi, A. Aminzadeh, D. Rahmatabadi, and S.A. Rasouli, Statistical and Experimental Analysis of Process Parameters of 3D Nylon Printed Parts by Fused Deposition Modeling: Response Surface Modeling and Optimization, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(7), p 5441–5454.10.1007/s11665-021-05848-4 ↗
30. S. Garg, S. Bansal, and Q. Murtaza, Failure Investigation of an Elbow Pipe Used in Sewage Water Treatment Facility, Mater. Corros.Corros., 2024, 75(9), p 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20241433610.1002/maco.202414336 ↗
31. C.K. Yeoh, C.S. Cheah, R. Pushpanathan, C.C. Song, M.A. Tan, and P.L. Teh, Effect of Infill Pattern on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed PLA and CPLA, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, 957(1), p 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/957/1/01206410.1088/1757-899X/957/1/012064 ↗
32. İ. Böğrekci, P. Demircioğlu, H. Saygın Sucuoğlu, and O. Turhanlar, The Effect of the Infill Type and Density on Hardness of 3d Printed Parts, Int. J. 3D Print. Technol. Digital Indus., 2019, 3(3), p 212–219
33. M.S. Alsoufi and A.E. Elsayed, How Surface Roughness Performance of Printed Parts Manufactured by Desktop FDM 3D Printer with PLA+ Is Influenced by Measuring Direction, Am. J. Mech. Eng., 2017, 5(5), p 211–222. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajme-5-5-410.12691/ajme-5-5-4 ↗
34. V.M. Akhil, S.L. Aravind, R. Kiran, S.P. Sivapirakasam, and S. Mohan, Experimental Investigations on the Effect of Infill Patterns on PLA for Structural Applications, Mater. Today Proc., 2023, 76, p 636–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.29210.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.292 ↗
35. S. Garg, A. Sardar, R. Srivastava, S. Verma, and A.K. Madan, Variation in Tensile Strength of 3D Printed PLA Parts by Varying Infill Density and Infill Pattern, Saudi J. Eng. Technol., 2023, 8(05), p 103–107.10.36348/sjet.2023.v08i05.004 ↗
36. S. Garg and Q. Murtaza, Effect of Filler Paste’s Mixing Ratio on the Properties of Al-64430 Dip-Brazed Joints, Weld. World, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01772-y10.1007/s40194-024-01772-y ↗
37. B. Aloyaydi, S. Sivasankaran, and A. Mustafa, Investigation of Infill-Patterns on Mechanical Response of 3D Printed Poly-Lactic-Acid, Polym. Test.. Test., 2020, 87, p 106557.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106557 ↗
38. M. Pal and M.G. Edwards, Q-Families of CVD(MPFA) Schemes on General Elements: Numerical Convergence and the Maximum Principle, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 2010, 17(2), p 137–189.10.1007/s11831-010-9043-4 ↗
39. S. Ganeshkumar, S. Dharani Kumar, U. Magarajan, S. Rajkumar, B. Arulmurugan, S. Sharma, R.A. Changhe Li, and M.F. Ilyas, Investigation of Tensile Properties of Different Infill Pattern Structures of 3D-Printed PLA Polymers: Analysis and Validation Using Finite Element Analysis in ANSYS, Materials, 2022, 15(15), p 5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1515514210.3390/ma15155142 ↗
40. N. Maguluri, G. Suresh, and S.R. Guntur, Effect of Printing Parameters on the Hardness of 3D Printed Poly-Lactic Acid Parts Using DOE Approach, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2022, 1248(1), p 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1248/1/01200410.1088/1757-899X/1248/1/012004 ↗
41. R. Raj Mohan, R. Venkatraman, and S. Raghuraman, Experimental Analysis on Density, Micro-Hardness, Surface Roughness and Processing Time of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) through Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Using Box Behnken Design (BBD), Mater. Today Commun., 2021, 27, p 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10235310.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102353 ↗
42. A. Pulipaka, K.M. Gide, A. Beheshti, and Z.S. Bagheri, Effect of 3D Printing Process Parameters on Surface and Mechanical Properties of FFF-Printed PEEK, J. Manuf. Process., 2023, 85, p 368–386.10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.057 ↗
43. A.A. Ansari and M. Kamil, Izod Impact and Hardness Properties of 3D Printed Lightweight CF-Reinforced PLA Composites Using Design of Experiment, Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 2022, 5(3), p 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.04.00610.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.04.006 ↗
44. S. Garg and Q. Murtaza, Comparative Analysis of Dip-Brazing and TIG Welding on the Properties of Al-64430 Joints, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 2024, 39(3), p 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2024.240931710.1080/01694243.2024.2409317 ↗
45. M.L. Dezaki, M.K.A.M. Ariffin, A. Serjouei, A. Zolfagharian, S. Hatami, and M. Bodaghi, Influence of Infill Patterns Generated by Cad and Fdm 3d Printer on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Properties, Appl. Sci. (Switzerland), MDPI AG, 2021, 11(16).10.3390/app11167272 ↗
46. P. Patil, D. Singh, S.J. Raykar, and J. Bhamu, Multi-Objective Optimization of Process Parameters of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) for Printing Polylactic Acid (PLA) Polymer Components, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 45, p 4880–4885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.35310.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.353 ↗
47. A.I. Portoacă, R.G. Ripeanu, A. Dinită, and M. Tănase, Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters for Enhanced Surface Quality and Wear Resistance, Polymers, 2023, 15(16), p 3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1516341910.3390/polym15163419 ↗
48. K.E. Aslani, D. Chaidas, J. Kechagias, P. Kyratsis, and K. Salonitis, Quality Performance Evaluation of Thin Walled PLA 3D Printed Parts Using the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2020, 4(2), p 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp402004710.3390/jmmp4020047 ↗
49. P. Yadav, A. Sahai, and R.S. Sharma, Strength and Surface Characteristics of FDM-Based 3D Printed PLA Parts for Multiple Infill Design Patterns, J. Inst. Eng. (India), 2021, 102(1), p 197–207.
50. R.D. Bintara, D.Z. Lubis, and YRAji. Pradana, The Effect of Layer Height on the Surface Roughness in 3D Printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) Using FDM 3D Printing, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, 1034(1), p 012096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1034/1/01209610.1088/1757-899X/1034/1/012096 ↗
51. E. Provaggi, C. Capelli, B. Rahmani, G. Burriesci, and D.M. Kalaskar, 3D Printing Assisted Finite Element Analysis for Optimising the Manufacturing Parameters of a Lumbar Fusion Cage, Mater. Des. 2019, 163.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107540 ↗
52. M.C. Dudescu, L. Racz, and F. Popa, Effect of Infill Pattern on Fatigue Characteristics of 3D Printed Polymers, Mater. Today Proc., 2023, 78, p 263–269.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.283 ↗
53. M. Alharbi, I. Kong, and V.I. Patel, Simulation of Uniaxial Stress–Strain Response of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid by Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis, Appl. Adhesion Sci., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40563-020-00128-110.1186/s40563-020-00128-1 ↗
54. Y. Faik, Ş İbrahim Baki, K. Fatih, and U. Levent, The Effects of Different Process Parameters of PLA+ on Tensile Strengths in 3D Printer Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling, El-Cezeri Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 2023 https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.117949210.31202/ecjse.1179492 ↗
55. G.A. Johnson, and J.J. French, Evaluation of Infill Effect on Mechanical Properties of Consumer 3D Printing Materials, Adv. Technol. Innov., 2018, 3(4), p 179–184.
56. M. Rahmat Derise, and A. Zulkharnain, Effect of Infill Pattern and Density on Tensile Properties of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Parts via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng., 2021, 20(02), p 54–63.
57. P.K. Mishra, P. Senthil, S. Adarsh, and M.S. Anoop, An Investigation to Study the Combined Effect of Different Infill Pattern and Infill Density on the Impact Strength of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Parts, Compos. Commun., 2021, 24.10.1016/j.coco.2020.100605 ↗
58. M.S. Hussin, S. Hamat, S.A.S. Ali, M.A.A. Fozi, Y.A. Rahim, M.S.I.M. Dawi, and M. Darsin, “Experimental and Finite Element Modeling of Partial Infill Patterns for Thermoplastic Polymer Extrusion 3D Printed Material Using Elasto-Plastic Method,” AIP Conf. Proc., 2020.10.1063/5.0014978 ↗
59. F. Aldosari, M.A.A. Khan, M. Asad, and F. Djavanroodi, Finite Element Analysis of PolyLactic Acid (PLA) under Tensile and Compressive Loading, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2023, 2468(1), p 012094.10.1088/1742-6596/2468/1/012094 ↗
60. J. Carlsson and P. Isaksson, Dynamic Crack Propagation in Wood Fibre Composites Analysed by High Speed Photography and a Dynamic Phase Field Model, Int. J. Solids Struct.Struct., 2018, 144–145, p 78–85.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.04.015 ↗
61. I. Fekete, F. Ronkay, and L. Lendvai, Highly Toughened Blends of Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA) and Natural Rubber (NR) for FDM-Based 3D Printing Applications: The Effect of Composition and Infill Pattern, Polym Test, 2021, 99.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107205 ↗
62. M.R.M. Aliha, N. Nazemzadeh, S.M.N. Ghoreishi, and S.R. Kafshgar, The Impact of Sterilization, Body Environment Condition and Raster Orientation on Tensile-Shear Cracking of Sub-Sized 3D Printed Specimens, Theor. Appl. Fracture Mech., 2023, 126, p 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10395310.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103953 ↗
63. D. Bermudez, P.A. Quiñonez, E.J. Vasquez, I.A. Carrete, T.J. Word, and D.A. Roberson, A Comparison of the Physical Properties of Two Commercial 3D Printing PLA Grades, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2021, 16(2), p 178–195.10.1080/17452759.2021.1910047 ↗
64. C. Abeykoon, P. Sri-Amphorn, and A. Fernando, Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Parameters for Improved PLA and ABS 3D Printed Structures, Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 2020, 3(3), p 284–297.
65. R.K. Upadhyay, A.K. Mishra, and A. Kumar, Mechanical Degradation of 3D Printed PLA in Simulated Marine Environment, Surf. Interfaces, 2020, 21, p 100778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10077810.1016/j.surfin.2020.100778 ↗
66. Y. Tao, F. Kong, Z. Li, J. Zhang, X. Zhao, Q. Yin, D. Xing, and P. Li, A Review on Voids of 3D Printed Parts by Fused Filament Fabrication, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, 15, p 4860–4879.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108 ↗
67. D. Rahmatabadi, K. Soltanmohammadi, M. Aberoumand, E. Soleyman, I. Ghasemi, M. Baniassadi, K. Abrinia, M. Bodaghi, and M. Baghani, 4D Printing of Porous PLA-TPU Structures: Effect of Applied Deformation, Loading Mode and Infill Pattern on the Shape Memory Performance, Phys. Scr., 2024, 99(2), p 025013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad195710.1088/1402-4896/ad1957 ↗
68. S.A. Tronvoll, T. Welo, and C.W. Elverum, The Effects of Voids on Structural Properties of Fused Deposition Modelled Parts: A Probabilistic Approach, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 97(9–12), p 3607–3618.10.1007/s00170-018-2148-x ↗
69. E.A. Papon and A. Haque, Tensile Properties, Void Contents, Dispersion and Fracture Behaviour of 3D Printed Carbon Nanofiber Reinforced Composites, J. Reinforc. Plast. Compos., 2018, 37(6), p 381–395.10.1177/0731684417750477 ↗
70. V. Korkut, F. Darıcık, İ. Aktitiz, and K. Aydın, Failure of Surface Modification 3D Printed Polymer Materials by UV/Ozone Irradiation, Eng Fail Anal, 2023, 152.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107466 ↗
71. X. Wang, L. Zhao, J.Y.H. Fuh, and H.P. Lee, Effect of Porosity on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymers: Experiments and Micromechanical Modeling Based on x-Ray Computed Tomography Analysis, Polymers, 2019, 11(7), p 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1107115410.3390/polym11071154 ↗