Intelligent Machine Learning Strategies for Minimizing Machining Power in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Engineering Technology and Methodologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. A.K. Sahoo and B. Sahoo, A comparative study on performance of multilayer coated and uncoated carbide inserts when turning AISI D2 steel under dry environment, Measurement, 2013, 46 p 2695–2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.02410.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.024 ↗
2. S. Chinchanikar and S.K. Choudhury, Machining of hardened steel—Experimental investigations p erformance modeling and cooling techniques: a review, Int. J. Mach. Tools ManufManuf, 2015, 89 p 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.002 ↗
3. R. Mallick, R. Kumar, A. Panda, and A.K. Sahoo, Current status of hard turning in manufacturing: aspects of cooling strategy and sustainability, Lubricants, 2023, 11 p 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants1103010810.3390/lubricants11030108 ↗
4. G. Byrne, D. Dornfeld, and B. Denkena, Advancing cutting technology, CIRP Ann., 2003, 52 p 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60200-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)60200-5 ↗
5. H. Wu and S. Zhang, Effects of cutting conditions on the milling process of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 77 p 2235–2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6645-210.1007/s00170-014-6645-2 ↗
6. P.C. Priarone, M. Robiglio, L. Settineri, and V. Tebaldo, Milling and turning of titanium aluminides by using minimum quantity lubrication, Procedia CIRP, 2014, 24 p 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.14710.1016/j.procir.2014.07.147 ↗
7. A. Shokrani, V. Dhokia, and S.T. Newman, Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2012, 57 p 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.002 ↗
8. J.W. Sutherland, V.N. Kulur, N.C. King, and B.F. Von Turkovich, An experimental investigation of air quality in wet and dry turning, CIRP Ann., 2000, 49 p 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62896-010.1016/S0007-8506(07)62896-0 ↗
9. C.M. Taylor, S.G. Abrego Hernandez, M. Marshall, and M. Broderick, Cutting fluid application for titanium alloys Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al in a finish turning process, Procedia CIRP, 2018, 77 p 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.27910.1016/j.procir.2018.08.279 ↗
10. A.D. Jayal, A.K. Balaji, R. Sesek, A. Gaul, and D.R. Lillquist, Machining performance and health effects of cutting fluid application in drilling of A390.0 cast aluminum alloy, J. Manuf. Process., 2007, 9 p 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(07)70114-710.1016/S1526-6125(07)70114-7 ↗
11. B. Li et al., Heat transfer performance of MQL grinding with different nanofluids for Ni-based alloys using vegetable oil, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 154 p 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.21310.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.213 ↗
12. N. Boubekri, V. Shaikh, and P.R. Foster, A technology enabler for green machining: minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), J. Manu. Tech. Mnagmnt., 2010, 21 p 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/1741038101104696810.1108/17410381011046968 ↗
13. A. Balasuadhakar, S.T. Kumaran, R. Kurniawan, and F. Ahmed, A comprehensive review on minimum quantity lubrication in turning process, Surf. Rev. Lett., 2022, 29 p 2230008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X2230008810.1142/S0218625X22300088 ↗
14. N. Khanna and P. Shah, Comparative analysis of dry, flood, MQL and cryogenic CO2 techniques during the machining of 15-5-PH SS alloy, Tribol. Int.. Int., 2020, 146, 106196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.10619610.1016/j.triboint.2020.106196 ↗
15. Y. Kaynak, T. Lu, and I.S. Jawahir, Cryogenic machining-induced surface integrity: a review and comparison with Dry, MQL, and flood-cooled machining, Mach. Sci. Technol., 2014, 18 p 149–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2014.89783610.1080/10910344.2014.897836 ↗
16. J.J. Taha-Tijerina and I.A. Edinbarough, Comparative cutting fluid study on optimum grinding parameters of Ti-6Al-4V alloy using flood, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), and nanofluid MQL (NMQL), Lubricants, 2023, 11 p 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants1106025010.3390/lubricants11060250 ↗
17. Y. Kaynak, Evaluation of machining performance in cryogenic machining of Inconel 718 and comparison with dry and MQL machining, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 72 p 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5683-010.1007/s00170-014-5683-0 ↗
18. S. Suda, T. Wakabayashi, I. Inasaki, and H. Yokota, Multifunctional application of a synthetic ester to machine tool lubrication based on MQL machining lubricants, CIRP Ann., 2004, 53 p 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60645-310.1016/S0007-8506(07)60645-3 ↗
19. P.B. Zaman, M.I.H. Tusar, and N.R. Dhar, Selection of appropriate process inputs for turning Ti-6Al-4V alloy under hybrid Al2O3 -MWCNT nano-fluid based MQL, Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., 2022, 8 p 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.181232410.1080/2374068X.2020.1812324 ↗
20. M.K. Gupta et al. p arametric optimization and process capability analysis for machining of nickel-based superalloy, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 102 p 3995–4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03453-310.1007/s00170-019-03453-3 ↗
21. T. Leppert, Surface layer properties of AISI 316L steel when turning under dry and with minimum quantity lubrication conditions, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B. J. Eng. Manuf., 2012, 226 p 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541142989410.1177/0954405411429894 ↗
22. M.H.S. Elmunafi, D. Kurniawan and M.Y. Noordin, Use of castor oil as cutting fluid in machining of hardened stainless steel with minimum quantity of lubricant, Procedia CIRP, 2015, 26 p 408–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.00110.1016/j.procir.2015.03.001 ↗
23. N.R. Dhar, M.W. Islam, S. Islam, and M.A.H. Mithu, The influence of minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) on cutting temperature, chip and dimensional accuracy in turning AISI-1040 steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 171 p 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.04710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.047 ↗
24. P. Sam Paul, A.S. Varadarajan, and S. Mohanasundaram, Effect of magnetorheological fluid on tool wear during hard turning with minimal fluid application, Arc. Civil Mech. Eng., 2015, 15 p 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2014.03.00710.1016/j.acme.2014.03.007 ↗
25. M. Abas, L. Sayd, R. Akhtar, Q.S. Khalid, A.M. Khan, and C.I. Pruncu, Optimization of machining parameters of aluminum alloy 6026–T9 under MQL-assisted turning process, J. Market. Res., 2020, 9 p 10916–10940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.07110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.071 ↗
26. V.P. Astakhov, Improving sustainability of machining operation as a system endeavor, Sustainable machining. J. Paulo Davim Ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017 p 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51961-6_110.1007/978-3-319-51961-6_1 ↗
27. I. Deiab, On energy efficient and sustainable machining through hybrid processes, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2014, 29 p 1338–1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2014.92170610.1080/10426914.2014.921706 ↗
28. C. Camposeco-Negrete and J. De Dios Calderón-Nájera, Sustainable machining as a mean of reducing the environmental impacts related to the energy consumption of the machine tool: a case study of AISI 1045 steel machining, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 102 p 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3178-010.1007/s00170-018-3178-0 ↗
29. N. Khanna, J. Airao p . Maheshwari, C.K. Nirala, and J. Outeiro, Life cycle assessment to reduce environmental and carbon footprints of ultrasonic-assisted turning, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2023, 37, e00674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e0067410.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00674 ↗
30. R.R. Boyer and R.D. Briggs, The use of β titanium alloys in the aerospace industry, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2005, 14 p 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1361/105994905X7544810.1361/105994905X75448 ↗
31. R.R. Boyer, Aerospace applications of beta titanium alloys, JOM, 1994, 46 p 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0322074310.1007/BF03220743 ↗
32. A.K. Dhal, A. Panda, R. Kumar, and A.K. Sahoo, Different machining environments impact analysis for Ti-6Al-4V alloy (Grade 5) turning process: a scoping review, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 44 p 2342–2347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.43210.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.432 ↗
33. D. Sarma, M. Chandrasekaran, and A.K. Sahoo, Application of Jaya algorithm for minimizing surface finish in MQL-based green machining of titanium alloy, Advances in Manufacturing Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICFAMMT 2022. M.K. Dikshit, J. Ashish Soni p . Davim Ed., Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023 p 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4208-2_110.1007/978-981-19-4208-2_1 ↗
34. S. Swain, R. Kumar, I. Panigrahi, A.K. Sahoo, and A. Panda, Machinability performance investigation in CNC turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy: dry versus iron-aluminium oil coupled MQL machining comparison, Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 2022, 5 p 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.06.00210.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.06.002 ↗
35. S. Swain, I. Panigrahi, A.K. Sahoo, A. Panda, and R. Kumar, An experimental investigation to augment the machinability characteristics during dry turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2022, 47 p 8105–8127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06099-010.1007/s13369-021-06099-0 ↗
36. G. Singh et al., Investigations of machining characteristics in the upgraded MQL-assisted turning of pure titanium alloys using evolutionary algorithms, Materials, 2019, 12 p 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1206099910.3390/ma12060999 ↗
37. V.V.K. Lakshmi, K.V. Subbaiah, A.V. Kothapalli, and K. Suresh p arametric optimization while turning Ti-6Al-4V alloy in Mist-MQCL (Green environment) using the DEAR method, Manufacturing Rev., 2020, 7 p 38. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/202003410.1051/mfreview/2020034 ↗
38. S. Pervaiz, I. Deiab, A. Rashid, and M. Nicolescu, Minimal quantity cooling lubrication in turning of Ti6Al4V: influence on surface roughness, cutting force and tool wear, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2017, 231 p 1542–1558. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541559994610.1177/0954405415599946 ↗
39. H. Lin, C. Wang, Y. Yuan, Z. Chen, Q. Wang, and W. Xiong, Tool wear in Ti-6Al-4V alloy turning under oils on water cooling comparing with cryogenic air mixed with minimal quantity lubrication, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 81 p 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7062-x10.1007/s00170-015-7062-x ↗
40. S. Pervaiz, A. Rashid, I. Deiab, and C.M. Nicolescu, An experimental investigation on effect of minimum quantity cooling lubrication (MQCL) in machining titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 87 p 1371–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8969-610.1007/s00170-016-8969-6 ↗
41. S. Roy, R. Kumar, A.K. Sahoo, and A. Panda, Cutting tool failure and surface finish analysis in pulsating MQL-assisted hard turning, J. Fail. Anal. Preven., 2020, 20 p 1274–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00940-810.1007/s11668-020-00940-8 ↗
42. D.-H. Kim et al., Smart machining process using machine learning: a review and perspective on machining industry, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol., 2018, 5(4) p 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0057-y10.1007/s40684-018-0057-y ↗
43. P. Larrañaga, D. Atienza, J. Diaz-Rozo, A. Ogbechie, C. Puerto-Santana, and C. Bielza, Industrial Applications of Machine Learning, CRC Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/978135112838410.1201/9781351128384 ↗
44. G. Rebala, A. Ravi, and S. Churiwala, An Introduction to Machine Learning, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15729-610.1007/978-3-030-15729-6 ↗
45. Y. Baştanlar and M. Özuysal, Introduction to Machine Learning, miRNomics: MicroRNA Biology and Computational Analysis. M. Yousef, J. Allmer Ed., Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2014 p 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_710.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_7 ↗
46. K. P. Murphy, Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. Adaptive computation and machine learning series. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2012
47. J. Borah and M. Chandrasekaran, “Prediction and optimization of tensile strength of additively manufactured PEEK biopolymer using machine learning techniques, Multiscale Multidiscip Model. Exp. Des., 2024, 7 p 4487–4502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-024-00505-410.1007/s41939-024-00505-4 ↗
48. Y. Zhang and X. Xu, Machine learning surface roughnesses in turning processes of brass metals, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2022, 121 p 2437–2444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09498-110.1007/s00170-022-09498-1 ↗
49. C.A.L. Nametala, A.M. Souza, B.R. Pereira Júnior, and E.J. Da Silva, A simulator based on artificial neural networks and NSGA-II for prediction and optimization of the grinding process of superalloys with high performance grinding wheels, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2020, 30 p 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.05.00410.1016/j.cirpj.2020.05.004 ↗
50. D. Cica, B. Sredanovic, S. Tesic, and D. Kramar p redictive modeling of turning operations under different cooling/lubricating conditions for sustainable manufacturing with machine learning techniques, ACI, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2020.02.00110.1016/j.aci.2020.02.001 ↗
51. M.S. Surya, G. Prasanthi, A.K. Kumar, V.K. Sridhar, and S.K. Gugulothu, Optimization of cutting parameters while turning Ti-6Al-4 V using response surface methodology and machine learning technique, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., 2021, 15 p 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-021-00774-010.1007/s12008-021-00774-0 ↗
52. A.-T. Nguyen, V.-H. Nguyen, T.-T. Le, and N.-T. Nguyen, A hybridization of machine learning and NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization of surface roughness and cutting force in ANSI 4340 alloy steel turning, J. Mach. Eng., 2023 https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/16017210.36897/jme/160172 ↗
53. A. Kumar, G. Singh, and V. Aggarwal, Analysis and optimization of nozzle distance during turning of EN-31 steel using minimum quantity lubrication, Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 49 p 1360–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.06010.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.060 ↗
54. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks, Mach. Learn., 1995, 20 p 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0099401810.1007/BF00994018 ↗
55. I. Abu-Mahfouz, O. El Ariss, A.H.M. Esfakur Rahman, and A. Banerjee, Surface roughness prediction as a classification problem using support vector machine, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 92 p 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0165-910.1007/s00170-017-0165-9 ↗
56. J.S.R. Jang, C.T. Sun, and E. Mizutani, Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing-a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence [book review], IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 1997, 42 p 1482–1484. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1997.63384710.1109/TAC.1997.633847 ↗
57. S.O. Sada and S.C. Ikpeseni, Evaluation of ANN and ANFIS modeling ability in the prediction of AISI 1050 steel machining performance, Heliyon, 2021, 7, e06136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0613610.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06136 ↗
58. R.V. Rao, V.J. Savsani, and D.P. Vakharia, Teaching–learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems, Comput. Aided Des., 2011, 43 p 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.01510.1016/j.cad.2010.12.015 ↗
59. R. Venkata Rao and V.D. Kalyankar, Multi-pass turning process parameter optimization using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm, Sci. Iranica, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2013.01.00210.1016/j.scient.2013.01.002 ↗
60. K. Abhishek, V. Rakesh Kumar, S. Datta, and S.S. Mahapatra p arametric appraisal and optimization in machining of CFRP composites by using TLBO (teaching–learning based optimization algorithm), J. Intell. Manuf., 2017, 28 p 1769–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1050-810.1007/s10845-015-1050-8 ↗
61. S.C. Satapathy, A. Naik, and K. Parvathi, A teaching learning-based optimization based on orthogonal design for solving global optimization problems, Springer Plus, 2013, 2 p 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-13010.1186/2193-1801-2-130 ↗
62. K.B. Ahsan, A.M. Mazid, and G.K.H. Pang, Morphological investigation of Ti-6Al-4V chips produced by conventional turning, Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater., 2016, 18 p 138. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMM.2016.07547210.1504/IJMMM.2016.075472 ↗
63. Z. Zhu, J. Sun, J. Li, and P. Huang, Investigation on the influence of tool wear upon chip morphology in end milling titanium alloy Ti6Al4V, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 83 p 1477–1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7690-110.1007/s00170-015-7690-1 ↗