Enhancing Predictive Capabilities: Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Mechanical Behavior in Friction Stir Welded Aluminum Alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate prediction of friction stir welding (FSW) joint behavior is crucial for optimizing welding processes and ensuring structural integrity. This study exploits machine learning to predict the mechanical behavior of aluminum alloy FSW joints under varying temperatures. It involves a comparison of predictive performance across 18 models, including support vector regression (SVR), Gaussian process regression (GPR), ensemble models, and five distinct types of neural networks (NN). The assessment used Al6061-T6 aluminum alloy with the FSW joining method at temperatures of 25, 100, 200, and 300 degrees C. To ensure robustness, the machine learning models were developed using a fivefold cross-validation approach, with Bayesian optimization applied for fine-tuning during training. Results revealed the ability of machine learning to precisely predict the mechanical behavior of FSW joints. Specifically, GPR and the triple NN model outperformed other models, achieving average R2 values of 0.9879 and 0.9703, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. X. Meng, Y. Huang, J. Cao, J. Shen, and J.F. dos Santos, Recent progress on control strategies for inherent issues in friction stir welding, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2021, 115, 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10070610.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100706 ↗
2. X. Meng, Y. Xie, S. Sun, X. Ma, L. Wan, J. Cao, and Y. Huang, Lightweight design: friction-based welding between metal and polymer, Acta Metall. Sin. English Lett., 2023, 36(6), p 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-023-01552-510.1007/s40195-023-01552-5 ↗
3. A.G. Boitsov, D.N. Kuritsyn, M.V. Siluyanova, and V.V. Kuritsyna, Friction stir welding in the aerospace industry, Russ. Eng. Res., 2018, 38, p 1029-1033.10.3103/S1068798X18120043 ↗
4. A. Mishra and D. Dixit, Friction stir welding of aerospace alloys, J. Mech. Eng., 2019, 7, p 863-870.
5. H. Luo, F. Zhao, S. Guo, C. Yu, G. Liu, and T. Wu, Mechanical performance research of friction stir welding robot for aerospace applications, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 2021, 18(1), p 1729881421996543.10.1177/1729881421996543 ↗
6. G.E. Cook, R. Crawford, D.E. Clark, and A.M. Strauss, Robotic friction stir welding, Ind. Robot., 2004, 33(1), p 55-63.10.1108/01439910410512000 ↗
7. C.B. Smith, Robotic friction stir welding using a standard industrial robot, 2nd Frict Stir Weld. Int. Symp., 2000, 42(3), p 40-41.
8. A.K. Lakshminarayanan, V.E. Annamalai, and K. Elangovan, Identification of optimum friction stir spot welding process parameters controlling the properties of low carbon automotive steel joints, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2015, 43(2), p 262-272.10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.01.001 ↗
9. A. Loureiro, R.M. Leal, C. Leitão, D.M. Rodrigues, and P. Vilaça, Friction stir welding of automotive aluminium alloys, Weld. World, 2007, 51(1), p 433.
10. J. Martin and S. Wei, Friction stir welding technology for marine applications, Frict. Stir Weld. Process. VIII, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48173-9_2410.1007/978-3-319-48173-9_24 ↗
11. D.M. Sekban, S.M. Aktarer, and G. Purcek, Friction stir welding of low-carbon shipbuilding steel plates: microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci.. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., 2019, 50, p 4127-4140.10.1007/s11661-019-05324-8 ↗
12. G. Ghangas and S. Singhal, Effect of tool pin profile and dimensions on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded armor alloy, Mater. Res. Express, 2018, 5(6), p 066555.10.1088/2053-1591/aacdb1 ↗
13. Y. Xie, X. Meng, and Y. Huang, Entire-process simulation of friction stir welding—part 1: experiments and simulation, Weld. J., 2022, 5, p 144-159.10.29391/2022.101.011 ↗
14. Y. Xie, X. Meng, and Y. Huang, Entire-process simulation of friction stir welding—part 2: implementation of neural networks, Weld. J., 2022, 101, p 172-177.10.29391/2022.101.013 ↗
15. Y. Huang, Y. Xie, X. Meng, J. Li, and L. Zhou, Joint formation mechanism of high depth-to-width ratio friction stir welding, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(7), p 1261-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.01.01610.1016/j.jmst.2019.01.016 ↗
16. M. Peel, A. Steuwer, M. Preuss, and P.J. Withers, Microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses as a function of welding speed in aluminium AA5083 friction stir welds, Acta Mater., 2003, 51(16), p 4791-4801.10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00319-7 ↗
17. J.Q. Su, T.W. Nelson, R. Mishra, and M. Mahoney, Microstructural investigation of friction stir welded 7050–T651 aluminium, Acta Mater., 2003, 51(3), p 713-729.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00449-4 ↗
18. J.-Q. Su, T.W. Nelson, and C.J. Sterling, Microstructure evolution during FSW/FSP of high strength aluminum alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 405(1-2), p 277-286.10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.009 ↗
19. D.A. Wadeson, X. Zhou, G.E. Thompson, P. Skeldon, L.D. Oosterkamp, and G. Scamans, Corrosion behaviour of friction stir welded AA7108 T79 aluminium alloy, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48(4), p 887-897.10.1016/j.corsci.2005.02.020 ↗
20. D. Li, X. Yang, L. Cui, F. He, and H. Shen, Effect of welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of AA6061-T6 butt welded joints by stationary shoulder friction stir welding, Mater. Des., 2014, 64, p 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.04610.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.046 ↗
21. A. Dorbane, G. Ayoub, B. Mansoor, R.F. Hamade, and A. Imad, Effect of temperature on microstructure and fracture mechanisms in friction stir welded Al6061 joints, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2704-910.1007/s11665-017-2704-9 ↗
22. P. Rabe, A. Schiebahn, and U. Reisgen, Deep learning approaches for force feedback based void defect detection in friction stir welding, J. Adv. Join. Process., 2022, 5, p 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAJP.2021.10008710.1016/J.JAJP.2021.100087 ↗
23. V.M. Dehabadi, S. Ghorbanpour, and G. Azimi, Application of artificial neural network to predict vickers microhardness of AA6061 friction stir welded sheets, J. Cent. South Univ., 2016, 23, p 2146-2155.10.1007/s11771-016-3271-1 ↗
24. A. Dorbane, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun, Exploring deep learning methods to forecast mechanical behavior of FSW aluminum sheets, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-07376-110.1007/s11665-022-07376-1 ↗
25. P. Bhatt, N. Singh, and S. Chaudhary, Potential of machine learning algorithms in material science: predictions in design, properties, and applications of novel functional materials, Mach. Learn. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0393-1_410.1007/978-981-99-0393-1_4 ↗
26. R.P. Joshi, V. Pejaver, N.E. Hammarlund, H. Sung, S.K. Lee, A. Furmanchuk, H.Y. Lee, G. Scott, S. Gombar, N. Shah, S. Shen, A. Nassiri, D. Schneider, F.S. Ahmad, D. Liebovitz, A. Kho, S. Mooney, B.A. Pinsky, and N. Banaei, A predictive tool for identification of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative emergency department patients using routine test results, J. Clin. Virol., 2020, 129, p 104502.10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104502 ↗
27. A. Dorbane, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun, A Tree-Driven Ensemble Learning Approach to Predict FS Welded Al-6061-T6 Material Behavior, in 2022 7th International Conference on Frontiers of Signal Processing (ICFSP), IEEE, 2022, p 184-188, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFSP55781.2022.992488310.1109/ICFSP55781.2022.9924883 ↗
28. M. Paulic, D. Mocnik, M. Ficko, J. Balic, T. Irgolic, and S. Klancnik, Inteligentni Sustav Za Predviđanje Mehaničkih Svojstava Materijala Na Osnovu Metalografskih Slika, Teh. Vjesn., 2015, 22(6), p 1419-1424.
29. N.D. Ghetiya and K.M. Patel, Prediction of tensile strength in friction stir welded aluminium alloy using artificial neural network, Procedia Technol., 2014, 14, p 274-281.10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.036 ↗
30. S. Verma, M. Gupta, and J.P. Misra, Performance evaluation of friction stir welding using machine learning approaches, MethodsX, 2018, 5, p 1048-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.00210.1016/j.mex.2018.09.002 ↗
31. S. Verma, J.P. Misra, J. Singh, U. Batra, and Y. Kumar, Prediction of tensile behavior of FS welded AA7039 using machine learning, Mater. Today Commun., 2021, 26, 101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10193310.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101933 ↗
32. A. Mishra and R. Morisetty, Determination of the Ultimate Tensile Strength ( UTS ) of Friction Stir Welded Similar AA6061 Joints by Using Supervised Machine Learning Based Algorithms, Manuf. Lett., Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME), 2022, 32, p 83-86, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.04.003.10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.04.003 ↗
33. S. Verma, J.P. Misra, and D. Popli, Modeling of friction stir welding of aviation grade aluminium alloy using machine learning approaches, Int. J. Model. Simul., 2022, 42(1), p 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2020.180360510.1080/02286203.2020.1803605 ↗
34. F. Harrou, M.M. Hittawe, Y. Sun, and O. Beya, Malicious attacks detection in crowded areas using deep learning-based approach, IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag., 2020, 23(5), p 57-62.10.1109/MIM.2020.9153576 ↗
35. F. Harrou, Y. Sun, A.S. Hering, and M. Madakyaru, Statistical Process Monitoring Using Advanced Data-Driven and Deep Learning Approaches: Theory and Practical Applications, Elsevier, 2020.
36. W. Wang, J. Lee, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun, Early detection of Parkinson’s disease using deep learning and machine learning, IEEE Access, IEEE, 2020, 8, p 147635-147646.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016062 ↗
37. ASTM-B308/B308M-10, “Standard Specification for Aluminum-Alloy 6061-T6 Standard Structural Profile, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010, https://www.astm.org/,” 2010
38. ASTM-E8/E8M, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, https://www.astm.org/,” (West Conshohocken, PA), ASTM International, 2015, p 1-27, doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-15A10.1520/E0008_E0008M-15A ↗
39. ASTM-E21, “Standard Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, https://www.astm.org/.,” (West Conshohocken, PA), ASTM International, 2009, p 1-8, doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/E0021-09.210.1520/E0021-09.2 ↗
40. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens, E3−11, ASTM Int., 2012.
41. W.M. Ridwan, M. Sapitang, A. Aziz, K.F. Kushiar, A.N. Ahmed, and A. El-Shafie, Rainfall forecasting model using machine learning methods: case study Terengganu, Malaysia, Ain Shams Eng. J., 2021, 12(2), p 1651-1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.09.01110.1016/j.asej.2020.09.011 ↗
42. V. Vapnik, S. Golowich, and A. Smola, Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation and signal processing, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. M.C. Mozer, M. Jordan, T. Petsche Ed., MIT Press, UK, 1996
43. X. Su, J. An, Y. Zhang, P. Zhu, and B. Zhu, Prediction of ozone hourly concentrations by support vector machine and kernel extreme learning machine using wavelet transformation and partial least squares methods, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2020, 11(6), p 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.02.02410.1016/j.apr.2020.02.024 ↗
44. F. Harrou, A. Saidi, Y. Sun, and S. Khadraoui, Monitoring of photovoltaic systems using improved kernel-based learning schemes N3, IEEE J. Photovolt., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.305716910.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3057169 ↗
45. Q. Pan, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun, A comparison of machine learning methods for ozone pollution prediction, J. Big Data, 2023, 10(1), p 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40537-023-00748-X10.1186/S40537-023-00748-X ↗
46. T. Kari, W. Gao, A. Tuluhong, Y. Yaermaimaiti, and Z. Zhang, Mixed kernel function support vector regression with genetic algorithm for forecasting dissolved gas content in power transformers, Energies, 2018, 11(9), p 2437.10.3390/en11092437 ↗
47. J. Mendes-Moreira, C. Soares, A.M. Jorge, and J.F. De Sousa, Ensemble approaches for regression: a survey, ACM Comput. Surv., 2012 https://doi.org/10.1145/2379776.237978610.1145/2379776.2379786 ↗
48. Z.-H. Zhou, Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms, 1st ed. Chapman Hall, 2012.10.1201/b12207 ↗
49. R.E. Schapire, The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning: An Overview BT - Nonlinear Estimation and Classification, D.D. Denison, M.H. Hansen, C.C. Holmes, B. Mallick, and B. Yu, Eds., (New York, NY), Springer New York, 2003, p 149-171, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21579-2_9.10.1007/978-0-387-21579-2_9 ↗
50. P. Bühlmann, and T. Hothorn, Boosting algorithms: regularization, prediction and model fitting, Stat. Sci., 2007, 22(4), p 477-505. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS24210.1214/07-STS242 ↗
51. A. Alkesaiberi, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun, Efficient wind power prediction using machine learning methods: a comparative study, Energies, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3390/en1507232710.3390/en15072327 ↗
52. B. Khaldi, F. Harrou, S.M. Benslimane, and Y. Sun, A data-driven soft sensor for swarm motion speed prediction using ensemble learning methods, IEEE Sens. J., 2021, 21(17), p 19025-19037.10.1109/JSEN.2021.3087342 ↗
53. J. Lee, W. Wang, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun, Reliable solar irradiance prediction using ensemble learning-based models: a comparative study, Energy Convers. Manag., 2020, 208, p 112582.10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112582 ↗
54. F. Harrou, B. Taghezouit, S. Khadraoui, A. Dairi, Y. Sun, and A. Hadj Arab, Ensemble learning techniques-based monitoring charts for fault detection in photovoltaic systems, Energies, 2022, 15(18), p 6716.10.3390/en15186716 ↗
55. H. Cai, X. Jia, J. Feng, W. Li, Y.-M. Hsu, and J. Lee, Gaussian process regression for numerical wind speed prediction enhancement, Renew. Energy, 2020, 146, p 2112-2123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.01810.1016/j.renene.2019.08.018 ↗
56. C.K.I. Williams and C.E. Rasmussen, Gaussian Processes for Regression. in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (Cambridge, MA, USA), MIT Press, 1995, p 514-520
57. E. Schulz, M. Speekenbrink, and A. Krause, A tutorial on gaussian process regression: modelling, exploring, and exploiting functions, J. Math. Psychol., 2018, 85, p 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.00110.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.001 ↗
58. Y. Alali, F. Harrou, and Y. Sun, A proficient approach to forecast COVID-19 spread via optimized dynamic machine learning models, Sci. Rep., 2022, 12(1), p 2467.10.1038/s41598-022-06218-3 ↗
59. S. Laref, F. Harrou, B. Wang, Y. Sun, A. Laref, T.-M. Laleg-Kirati, T. Gojobori, and X. Gao, Synergy of small antiviral molecules on a black-phosphorus nanocarrier: machine learning and quantum chemical simulation insights, Molecules, 2023, 28(8), p 3521.10.3390/molecules28083521 ↗
60. P. Kumar, S.H. Lai, J.K. Wong, N.S. Mohd, M.R. Kamal, H.A. Afan, A.N. Ahmed, M. Sherif, A. Sefelnasr, and A. El-Shafie, Review of nitrogen compounds prediction in water bodies using artificial neural networks and other models, Sustainability, 2020, 12(11), p 4359.10.3390/su12114359 ↗
61. F. Farzad and A.H. El-Shafie, Performance enhancement of rainfall pattern—water level prediction model utilizing self-organizing-map clustering method, Water Resour. Manag., 2017, 31(3), p 945-959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1556-710.1007/s11269-016-1556-7 ↗
62. A. Yafouz, A.N. Ahmed, N. Zaini, and A. El-Shafie, Ozone concentration forecasting based on artificial intelligence techniques: a systematic review, Water Air Soil Pollut., 2021, 232(2), p 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-04989-510.1007/s11270-021-04989-5 ↗
63. W.C. Lin, and C.F. Tsai, Missing value imputation: a review and analysis of the literature (2006-2017), Artif. Intell. Rev., 2020, 53(2), p 1487-1509.10.1007/s10462-019-09709-4 ↗
64. W.J. Arbegast, A flow-partitioned deformation zone model for defect formation during friction stir welding, Scr. Mater., 2008, 58, p 372-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.031 ↗
65. R. Zettler, T. Vugrin, and M. Schmücker, Effects and defects of friction stir welds, Elsevier, Friction Stir Welding, 2010, p 245-27610.1533/9781845697716.2.245 ↗
66. B. Heinz and B. Skrotzki, Characterization of a friction-stir-welded aluminum alloy 6013, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2002, 33, p 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-002-0059-5LB-ref110.1007/s11663-002-0059-5LB-ref1 ↗
67. A. Dorbane, G. Ayoub, B. Mansoor, R. Hamade, G. Kridli, and A. Imad, Observations of the mechanical response and evolution of damage of AA 6061–T6 under different strain rates and temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 624, p 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.07410.1016/j.msea.2014.11.074 ↗
68. G. Mrówka-Nowotnik, J. Sieniawski, and M. Wierzbiñska, Intermetallic phase particles in 6082 aluminium alloy, Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2007, 28(2), p 69-76.
69. N.C.W. Kuijpers, F.J. Vermolen, C. Vuik, P.T.G. Koenis, K.E. Nilsen, and S. van der Zwaag, The dependence of the β-AlFeSi to α-Al(FeMn)Si transformation kinetics in Al–Mg–Si alloys on the alloying elements, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 394(1-2), p 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.07310.1016/j.msea.2004.09.073 ↗
70. D. Lassance, D. Fabregue, F. Delannay, and T. Pardoen, Micromechanics of room and high temperature fracture in 6xxx Al alloys, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2007, 52(1), p 62-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.06.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.06.001 ↗