journal article·2024-05Open access

Prediction of Flexural Strength with Fuzzy Logic Approach for Fused Deposition Modeling of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Components

Osman Ulkir, Gazi Akgun

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a preferred industrial manufacturing method for modeling and rapid prototyping of physical systems. The final product in AM must have appropriate mechanical properties, such as flexural strength and be of good quality. The selection of printing parameters is essential for this reason. In this study, three critical printing parameters, such as layer thickness (100-200-300 µm), raster angle (0-30-60°), and infill density (40-60-80%) were examined. The analysis of variance method was used to look at the relationship between these parameters and the flexure strength of samples fabricated using the fused deposition modeling technique with polyethylene terephthalate glycol material. The experimental design process was performed using Taguchi L9 orthogonal design. Fuzzy logic-based modeling was applied to estimate the flexural strength. The results demonstrated that the infill density is the most important parameter affecting flexural strength compared to the other parameters. The highest strength of 57.76 MPa was achieved when the layer thickness, raster angle, and infill density were set to 100 µm, 60°, and 80%, respectively. The fuzzy logic provided a high-accuracy estimation of the flexural strength with a maximum percentage error of 2.65%. Consequently, it was determined that the model and experimental results were in agreement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. N. Li, S. Huang, G. Zhang, R. Qin, W. Liu, H. Xiong, G. Shi, and J. Blackburn, Progress in Additive Manufacturing on New Materials: A Review, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35(2), p 242–269.10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.002 ↗
2. H. Kim, Y. Lin, and T.-L.B. Tseng, A Review on Quality Control in Additive Manufacturing, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2018, 24(3), p 645–669.10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048 ↗
3. Y. Zhang, L. Wu, X. Guo, S. Kane, Y. Deng, Y.-G. Jung, J.-H. Lee, and J. Zhang, Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Materials: A Review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27(1), p 1–13.10.1007/s11665-017-2747-y ↗
4. M.S. Bayraklilar, Dimensional Accuracy of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Material Produced by Additive Manufacturing Method, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08205-910.1007/s11665-023-08205-9 ↗
5. Y. Qin, Q. Qi, P.J. Scott, and X. Jiang, Status, Comparison, and Future of the Representations of Additive Manufacturing Data, Comput. Des., 2019, 111, p 44–64.
6. B. Ezair, S. Fuhrmann, and G. Elber, Volumetric Covering Print-Paths for Additive Manufacturing of 3D Models, Comput. Des., 2018, 100, p 1–13.10.1007/s00607-018-0586-9 ↗
7. M. Javaid and A. Haleem, Additive Manufacturing Applications in Medical Cases: A Literature Based Review, Alexandria J. Med., 2018, 54(4), p 411–422.10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.003 ↗
8. T. Pereira, J.V. Kennedy, and J. Potgieter, A Comparison of Traditional Manufacturing vs Additive Manufacturing, the Best Method for the Job, Procedia Manuf., 2019, 30, p 11–18.10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003 ↗
9. M. Carlotti and V. Mattoli, Functional Materials for Two-Photon Polymerization in Microfabrication, Small, 2019, 15(40), p 1902687.10.1002/smll.201902687 ↗
10. J. Huang, Q. Qin, and J. Wang, A Review of Stereolithography: Processes and Systems, Processes, 2020, 8(9), p 1138.10.3390/pr8091138 ↗
11. S.A.M. Tofail, E.P. Koumoulos, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, L. O’Donoghue, and C. Charitidis, Additive Manufacturing: Scientific and Technological Challenges, Market Uptake and Opportunities, Mater. Today, 2018, 21(1), p 22–37.10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
12. H. Li, J. Dai, Z. Wang, H. Zheng, W. Li, M. Wang, and F. Cheng, Digital Light Processing (DLP)-based (Bio) Printing Strategies for Tissue Modeling and Regeneration, Aggregate, 2023, 4(2), p e270.10.1002/agt2.270 ↗
13. Q. Ding, X. Li, D. Zhang, G. Zhao, and Z. Sun, Anisotropy of Poly(Lactic Acid)/Carbon Fiber Composites Prepared by Fused Deposition Modeling, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2020, 137(23), p 48786.10.1002/app.48786 ↗
14. T.N.A.T. Rahim, A.M. Abdullah, and H. Md Akil, Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites, Polym. Rev., 2019, 59(4), p 589–624.10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 ↗
15. P. Awasthi and S.S. Banerjee, Fused Deposition Modeling of Thermoplastic Elastomeric Materials: Challenges and Opportunities, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 46, p 102177.
16. M. Nabipour, B. Akhoundi, and A. Bagheri Saed, Manufacturing of Polymer/Metal Composites by Fused Deposition Modeling Process with Polyethylene, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2020, 137(21), p 48717.10.1002/app.48717 ↗
17. T. Kuipers, E.L. Doubrovski, J. Wu, and C.C.L. Wang, A Framework for Adaptive Width Control of Dense Contour-Parallel Toolpaths in Fused Deposition Modeling, Comput. Des., 2020, 128, p 102907.
18. A. Alafaghani and A. Qattawi, Investigating the Effect of Fused Deposition Modeling Processing Parameters Using Taguchi Design of Experiment Method, J. Manuf. Process., 2018, 36, p 164–174.10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025 ↗
19. M. Heidari-Rarani, N. Ezati, P. Sadeghi, and M. Badrossamay, Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for Tensile Properties of Polylactic Acid Specimens Using Taguchi Design of Experiment Method, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 2022, 35(12), p 2435–2452.10.1177/0892705720964560 ↗
20. D. Syrlybayev, B. Zharylkassyn, A. Seisekulova, M. Akhmetov, A. Perveen, and D. Talamona, Optimisation of Strength Properties of FDM Printed Parts—A Critical Review, Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(10), p 1587.10.3390/polym13101587 ↗
21. J. Brackett, D. Cauthen, J. Condon, T. Smith, N. Gallego, V. Kunc, and C. Duty, The Impact of Infill Percentage and Layer Height in Small-Scale Material Extrusion on Porosity and Tensile Properties, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 58, p 103063.
22. S.S. Iyer and O. Keles, Effect of Raster Angle on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, Compos. Commun., 2022, 32, p 101163.10.1016/j.coco.2022.101163 ↗
23. O. Ulkir and G. Akgun, Predicting and Optimising the Surface Roughness of Additive Manufactured Parts Using an Artificial Neural Network Model and Genetic Algorithm, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2023, 28(7), p 548–557.10.1080/13621718.2023.2200572 ↗
24. N. Nawafleh and E. Celik, Additive Manufacturing of Short Fiber Reinforced Thermoset Composites with Unprecedented Mechanical Performance, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 33, p 10110.
25. J.S. Chohan, N. Mittal, R. Kumar, S. Singh, S. Sharma, J. Singh, K.V. Rao, M. Mia, D.Y. Pimenov, and S.P. Dwivedi, Mechanical Strength Enhancement of 3D Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Polymer Components Using Neural Network Optimization Algorithm, Polymers (Basel), 2020, 12(10), p 2250.10.3390/polym12102250 ↗
26. N. Jayanth, P. Senthil, and C. Prakash, Effect of Chemical Treatment on Tensile Strength and Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed ABS Using the FDM Process, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2018, 13(3), p 155–163.10.1080/17452759.2018.1449565 ↗
27. N. Kladovasilakis, P. Charalampous, K. Tsongas, I. Kostavelis, D. Tzovaras, and D. Tzetzis, Influence of Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Parameters in Inconel 718 Superalloy, Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(4), p 1362.10.3390/ma15041362 ↗
28. D.A. Snelling, C.B. Williams, and A.P. Druschitz, Mechanical and Material Properties of Castings Produced via 3D Printed Molds, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 27, p 199–207.
29. A.D. Tura and H.B. Mamo, Characterization and Parametric Optimization of Additive Manufacturing Process for Enhancing Mechanical Properties, Heliyon, 2022, 8(7), p e09832.10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09832 ↗
30. G. Atakok, M. Kam, and H.B. Koc, Tensile, Three-Point Bending and Impact Strength of 3D Printed Parts Using PLA and Recycled PLA Filaments: A Statistical Investigation, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2022, 18, p 1542–1554.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.013 ↗
31. D.G. Zisopol, I. Nae, A.I. Portoaca, and I. Ramadan, A Statistical Approach of the Flexural Strength of PLA and ABS 3D Printed Parts, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., 2022, 12(2), p 8248–8252.10.48084/etasr.4739 ↗
32. A. Rabinowitz, P.M. DeSantis, C. Basgul, H. Spece, and S.M. Kurtz, Taguchi Optimization of 3D Printed Short Carbon Fiber Polyetherketoneketone (CFR PEKK), J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2023, 145, p 105981.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105981 ↗
33. H.B. Mamo, A.D. Tura, A. Johnson Santhosh, N. Ashok, and D. Kamalakara Rao, Modeling and Analysis of Flexural Strength with Fuzzy Logic Technique for a Fused Deposition Modeling ABS Components, Mater. Today Proc., 2022, 57, p 768–774.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.306 ↗
34. B. Vaissier, J.-P. Pernot, L. Chougrani, and P. Véron, Genetic-Algorithm Based Framework for Lattice Support Structure Optimization in Additive Manufacturing, Comput. Des., 2019, 110, p 11–23.
35. H. Gholizadeh, M. Goh, H. Fazlollahtabar, and Z. Mamashli, Modelling Uncertainty in Sustainable-Green Integrated Reverse Logistics Network Using Metaheuristics Optimization, Comput. Ind. Eng., 2022, 163, p 107828.10.1016/j.cie.2021.107828 ↗
36. B.M. Moreno-Cabezali, and J.M. Fernandez-Crehuet, Application of a Fuzzy-Logic Based Model for Risk Assessment in Additive Manufacturing R&D Projects, Comput. Ind. Eng., 2020, 145, p 106529.10.1016/j.cie.2020.106529 ↗
37. A. Heidarzadeh, Ö.M. Testik, G. Güleryüz, and R.V. Barenji, Development of a Fuzzy Logic Based Model to Elucidate the Effect of FSW Parameters on the Ultimate Tensile Strength and Elongation of Pure Copper Joints, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 53, p 250–259.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.020 ↗
38. N. Bagherian-Marandi, M. Ravanshadnia, and M.-R. Akbarzadeh-T, Two-Layered Fuzzy Logic-Based Model for Predicting Court Decisions in Construction Contract Disputes, Artif. Intell. Law, 2021, 29(4), p 453–484.10.1007/s10506-021-09281-9 ↗
39. N. Singh, D. Virmani, and X.-Z. Gao, A Fuzzy Logic-Based Method to Avert Intrusions in Wireless Sensor Networks using WSN-DS Dataset, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl., 2020, 19(03), p 2050018.10.1142/S1469026820500182 ↗
40. H. Huang, H. Xu, F. Chen, C. Zhang, and A. Mohammadzadeh, An Applied Type-3 Fuzzy Logic System: Practical Matlab Simulink and M-Files for Robotic, Control, and Modeling Applications, Symmetry (Basel), 2023, 15(2), p 475.10.3390/sym15020475 ↗
41. K. Kaplan, M. Kuncan, and H.M. Ertunc, (2015) “Prediction of Bearing Fault Size by Using Model of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System,” in 2015 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), IEEE, p 1925–192810.1109/SIU.2015.7130237 ↗
42. S. Hrehová, J. Husár, and L. Knapčíková, The Fuzzy Logic Predictive Model for Remote Increasing Energy Efficiency, Mob. Netw. Appl., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-022-02050-110.1007/s11036-022-02050-1 ↗