journal article·2021-12

Tensile Deformation and Fracture Behavior of AA5052 Aluminum Alloy under Different Strain Rates

Jinxiu Fang, Zhenyu Zhu, Xingquan Zhang, Lingling Xie, Zhenyi Huang

Publisher page

Abstract

To study the mechanical behavior of 5052 aluminum alloy at different strain rates, uniaxial tensile tests at quasi-static, medium, and high strain rates were carried out using a CMT5305 MTS hydraulic servo universal testing machine, Zwick HTM5020 high-speed tensile testing machine, and Split Hopkinson tensile bar device, and the stress-strain curves of the material were obtained. Then, the fracture morphology and microstructure of the samples were studied and analyzed using macroscopic and microscopic analysis methods to obtain the material’s fracture and deformation mechanism. The results show that 5052 aluminum alloy exhibits strain rate sensitivity, and its yield strength and strength limit increase with the increase in strain rate. At different strain rates, the forming properties of the materials are similar. The plastic deformation mechanism is all dislocation slip, and the fracture mechanism is all ductile fracture. However, with the increase in strain rate, the necking phenomenon becomes more remarkable, the dislocation density increases continuously, and the distribution becomes more uniform. The dimples on fracture surface became deeper, and the number of dimples increased, indicating that the plastic deformation of the material increases continuously.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. R.W. Armstrong and S.M. Walley, High Strain Rate Properties of Metals and Alloys, Int. Mater. Rev., 2008, 53, p 105–128.10.1179/174328008X277795 ↗
2. M. Baig, A.S. Khan, S.-H. Choi and E. Lee, Effect of Manufacturing Processes and Welding Type on Quasi-Static and Dynamic Responses of Aluminum Alloys: Experiments and Modeling, J. Dyn. Behav. Mater., 2015, 1, p 299–314.10.1007/s40870-015-0025-3 ↗
3. R.O. Smerd, Constitutive behavior of aluminum alloy sheet at high strain rates, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo (2005)
4. R.O. Smerd, S. Winkler, C. Salisbury, M. Worswicka, D. Lloyd and M. Finn, High Strain Rate Tensile Testing of Automotive Aluminum Alloy Sheet, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2005, 32, p 541–560.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.013 ↗
5. T. Rahmaan, A. Bardelcik, J. Imbert, C. Butcher and M.J. Worswick, Effect of Strain Rate on Flow Stress and Anisotropy of DP600, TRIP780, and AA5182-O Sheet Metal Alloys, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2016, 88, p 72–90.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.09.006 ↗
6. Q.S. Dai, Y.L. Deng, H.C. Jiang, J.G. Tang and J.Q. Chen, Hot Tensile Deformation Behaviors and a Phenomenological AA5083 Aluminum Alloy Fracture Damage Model, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 766, p 138325.10.1016/j.msea.2019.138325 ↗
7. H.J. Ma, L. Huang, Y. Tian and J.J. Li, Effects of Strain Rate on Dynamic Mechanical Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of 5A02-O Aluminum Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2014, 606, p 233–239.10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.081 ↗
8. C. Yan, N. Li, H.W. Jiang, D.Z. Wang and L. Liu, Effect of Electropulsing on Deformation Behavior, Texture and Microstructure of 5A02 Aluminum Alloy During Uniaxial Tension, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2015, 638, p 69–77.10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.058 ↗
9. S.L. Yan, H. Yang, H.W. Li and X. Yao, Variation of Strain Rate Sensitivity of an Aluminum Alloy in a Wide Strain Rate Range: Mechanism Analysis and Modeling, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 688, p 776–786.10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.077 ↗
10. M. Simoncini, A. Forcellese, E. Mancini, G. Chiappini and M. Sasso, Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Forming Limit Curves of AA6082 Aluminum Alloy at High Strain Rates, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech, 2021, 112(7–8), p 1973–1991.10.1007/s00170-020-06448-7 ↗
11. T. Ye, L.X. Li, P.C. Guo, G. Xiao and Z.M. Chen, Effect of Aging Treatment on the Microstructure and Flow Behavior of 6063 Aluminum Alloy Compressed Over a Wide Range of Strain Rate, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2016, 90, p 72–80.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.12.005 ↗
12. S.S. Yang, L.Q. Sun, H.K. Deng, G.Y. Li and J.J. Cui, A Modified Johnson-Cook Model of AA6061-O Aluminum Alloy with Quasi-Static Pre-strain at High Strain Rates, Int. J. Mater. Form., 2020, 8, p 3.
13. Y.B. Zhang, S. Yao, X. Hong and Z.G. Wan, A Modified Johnson-Cook Model for 7N01 Aluminum Alloy Under Dynamic Condition, J. Cent. South. Univ., 2017, 24, p 2550–2555.10.1007/s11771-017-3668-5 ↗
14. L.Y. Ye, Y. Dong, Y. Zhang, D.X. Sun and X.M. Zhang, Effect of Test Temperature and Strain Rate on Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of Aluminum Alloy 2519A, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28(2), p 4964–4971.10.1007/s11665-019-04216-7 ↗
15. P. Song, W.B. Li and X.M. Wang, A Study on Dynamic Plastic Deformation Behavior of 5052 Aluminum Alloy, Key Eng. Mater., 2019, 812, p 45–52.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.812.45 ↗
16. Z.C. Huang, W. Wang, Y.C. Zhang and J.M. Lai, Low Speed Impact Properties of 5052 Aluminum Alloy Plate, Proced. Manuf., 2020, 50, p 668–672.10.1016/j.promfg.2020.08.120 ↗
17. W.H. Zhou, Plastic deformation behaviors of pre-strained aluminum under high strain rate loadings, Ph.D. Thesis, Nanchang Hangkong University (2014).
18. D.H. Liu, H.P. Yu and C.F. Li, Comparative Study of the Microstructure of 5052 Aluminum Alloy Sheets Under Quasi-Static and High-Velocity Tension, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 551, p 280–287.10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.018 ↗
19. F. Feng, J.J. Li, Y.J. Zhang, L. Huang, H.L. Su, S.J. Cao, G.B. Shao and R.C. Chen, Microstructure Evolution of 5052 Aluminum Sheet in Electromagnetic High-Speed Impact, Metals, 2020, 10(5), p 564.10.3390/met10050564 ↗
20. J.X. Fang, J.H. Mo, J.J. Li and B. Zhou, Feasibility of Electromagnetic Pulse-Assisted Incremental Drawing with a Radial Magnetic Force for AA-5052 Aluminum Alloy Sheet, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2017, 88, p 3123–3137.10.1007/s00170-016-9025-2 ↗
21. D.Z. Wang, N. Li, X.T. Han, L. Li and L. Liu, Effect of Electromagnetic Bulging on Fatigue Behavior of 5052 Aluminum Alloy, Trans. Nonferr. Metal. Soc., 2017, 27, p 1224–1232.10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60143-2 ↗
22. J.C. Yu, B. Song, D.B. Xia, X. Zeng, Y.D. Huang, N. Hort, P.L. Mao and Z. Liu, Dynamic Tensile Properties and Microstructural Evolution of Extruded EW75 Magnesium Alloy at High Strain Rates, J. Magnes. Alloy, 2020, 8(3), p 849–859.10.1016/j.jma.2020.02.013 ↗
23. S.P. Shamchi, D. Queiros, P.J. Tavares and P.M.G.P. Moreira, Thermomechanical Characterization of alclad AA2024-T3 Aluminum Alloy using Split Hopkinson Tension Bar, Mech. Mater., 2019, 139, p 103198.1-103198.11.10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103198 ↗
24. W. Wen and J.G. Morris, An Investigation of Serrated Yielding in 5000 Series Aluminum Alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, 354, p p279-285.10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00017-0 ↗
25. R.C. Picu, G. Vincze, F. Ozturk, J.J. Gracio, F. Barlat and A.M. Maniatty, Strain Rate Sensitivity of the Commercial Aluminum Alloy AA5182-O, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 390, p 334–343.10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.029 ↗
26. K.M. Zhao, R. Fan and L.M. Wang, The Effect of Electric Current and Strain Rate on Serrated Flow of Sheet Aluminum Alloy 5754, J. Mater. Eng. Perform, 2016, 25(3), p 781–789.10.1007/s11665-016-1913-y ↗