Comparative Analysis of NSGA-II and TLBO for Optimizing Machining Parameters of Inconel 690: A Sustainable Manufacturing Paradigm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. D. Ren, Z. Xue, Y. Jiang, X. Hu, and Y. Zhang, Influence of Single Tensile Overload on Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of the Selective Laser Melting Inconel 625 Superalloy, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2020, 239, 107305.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107305 ↗
2. K. Manikandan and K. Palanikumar, Machinability Evaluation and Comparison of Incoloy 825, Inconel 603 XL, Monel K400 and Inconel 600 Super Alloys in Wire Electrical Discharge Machining, J. Market. Res., 2020, 9(6), p 12260–12272.
3. S. Ji, Z. Sun, W. Zhang, X. Chen, G. Xie, and H. Chang, Microstructural Evolution and High Temperature Resistance of Functionally Graded Material Ti-6Al-4V/Inconel 718 Coated by Directed Energy Deposition-Laser, J. Alloy. Compd., 2020, 848, 156255.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156255 ↗
4. Y. Xiang, Z. Wang, S. Zhang, L. Jiang, Y. Lin, and J. Tan, Cross-Sectional Performance Prediction of Metal Tubes Bending with Tangential Variable Boosting Based on Parameters-Weight-Adaptive CNN, Expert Syst. Appl., 2024, 237, 121465.10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121465 ↗
5. S. Rayapati, Gas Turbine Blade Failure Scenario due to Thermal Loads in Case of Nickel Based Super Alloys, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 46, p 8119–8126.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.063 ↗
6. M.V. Ramana, G.K.M. Rao, G. Prasanth, B. Sagar, P.R. Kumar, and B.R.R. Kumar, Effect of Machining Conditions on Shear Angle in Turning of A286 Iron Based Nickel Super Alloy, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 44, p 2319–2324.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.407 ↗
7. A.M. Jackson, N. Baskar, R. Sabarish, S.M. Raj, and A.A. Ahmed, Productivity and Quality Improvement by Optimization of Milling Parameters of Super Alloy, Mater. Today Proc., 2020, 33, p 3491–3496.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.415 ↗
8. Z. Wang, Y. Xiang, S. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Ma, J. Tan, and L. Wang, Physics-Informed Springback Prediction of 3D Aircraft Tubes with Six-Axis Free-Bending Manufacturing, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2024, 147, 109022.10.1016/j.ast.2024.109022 ↗
9. Ş Şirin, M. Sarıkaya, Ç.V. Yıldırım, and T. Kıvak, Machinability Performance of Nickel Alloy X-750 with SiAlON Ceramic Cutting Tool under Dry, MQL and hBN Mixed Nanofluid-MQL, Tribol. Int., 2021, 153, 106673.10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106673 ↗
10. F. Günan, T. Kıvak, Ç.V. Yıldırım, and M. Sarıkaya, Performance Evaluation of MQL with AL2O3 Mixed Nanofluids Prepared at Different Concentrations in Milling of Hastelloy C276 Alloy, J. Market. Res., 2020, 9(5), p 10386–10400.
11. K. Pandey and S. Datta, Machinability study of inconel 825 superalloy under nanofluid MQL: application of sunflower oil as a base cutting fluid with MWCNTs and nano-Al 2O3 as additives. In: Sustainable Manufacturing and Design, (Elsevier, 2021), p. 151.10.1016/B978-0-12-822124-2.00008-1 ↗
12. B. Li, C. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, D. Jia, M. Yang, and K. Sun, Heat Transfer Performance of MQL Grinding with Different Nanofluids for Ni-Based Alloys Using Vegetable Oil, J. Cleaner Prod., 2017, 154, p 1–11.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.213 ↗
13. Y. Wu, B. Deng, X. Li, Q. Li, T. Ye, S. Xiang, and A. Atrens, In-Situ EBSD Study on Twinning Activity Caused by Deep Cryogenic Treatment (DCT) for an As-Cast AZ31 Mg Alloy, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2024, 30, p 3840–3850.10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.04.099 ↗
14. M. Sarikaya, M.K. Gupta, I. Tomaz, M. Danish, M. Mia, S. Rubaiee, and N. Khanna, Cooling Techniques to Improve The Machinability and Sustainability of Light-Weight Alloys: A State-of-the-Art Review, J. Manuf. Processes, 2021, 62, p 179–201.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.013 ↗
15. M. Danish, T.L. Ginta, K. Habib, D. Carou, A.M.A. Rani, and B.B. Saha, Thermal Analysis During Turning of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Under Dry and Cryogenic Conditions, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 91, p 2855–2868.10.1007/s00170-016-9893-5 ↗
16. L. Tu, J. Chen, Q. An, W. Ming, J. Xu, M. Chen, and Z. Yang, Machinability Improvement of Compacted Graphite Irons in Milling Process with Supercritical CO2-Based MQL, J. Manuf. Processes, 2021, 68, p 154–168.10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.044 ↗
17. J. Wang, A. Fu, B. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Cao, H. Zhou, and Y. Liu, Weakening the Mechanical Property Anisotropy of Additively Manufactured Medium Entropy Alloy by Controlling the Cellular Structure, Addit. Manuf., 2024, 89, p 104303.
18. M.M.A. Khan, M.A.H. Mithu, and N.R. Dhar, Effects of Minimum Quantity Lubrication on Turning AISI 9310 Alloy Steel Using Vegetable Oil-Based Cutting Fluid, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209(15–16), p 5573–5583.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.014 ↗
19. E. Kuram, B. Ozcelik, M. Bayramoglu, E. Demirbas, and B.T. Simsek, Optimization of Cutting Fluids and Cutting Parameters During End Milling by Using D-Optimal Design Of Experiments, J. Clean. Prod., 2013, 42, p 159–166.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.003 ↗
20. S. Debnath, M.M. Reddy, and Q.S. Yi, Environmental Friendly Cutting Fluids and Cooling Techniques in Machining: A Review, J. Clean. Prod., 2014, 83, p 33–47.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.071 ↗
21. Y. Wang, C. Li, Y. Zhang, M. Yang, B. Li, D. Jia, and C. Mao, Experimental Evaluation of the Lubrication Properties of the Wheel/Workpiece Interface in Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Grinding Using Different Types of Vegetable Oils, J. Cleaner Prod., 2016, 127, p 487–499.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.121 ↗
22. M. Mia, M.K. Gupta, G. Singh, G. Królczyk, and D.Y. Pimenov, An Approach to Cleaner Production for Machining Hardened Steel Using Different Cooling-Lubrication Conditions, J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 187, p 1069–1081.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.279 ↗
23. A. Krämer, F. Klocke, H. Sangermann, and D. Lung, Influence of the Lubricoolant Strategy on Thermo-Mechanical Tool Load, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2014, 7(1), p 40–47.10.1016/j.cirpj.2013.09.001 ↗
24. K. Kishore, S.R. Chauhan, and M.K. Sinha, Application of Machine Learning Techniques in Environmentally Benign Surface Grinding of Inconel 625, Tribol. Int., 2023, 188, 108812.10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108812 ↗
25. M. Dhananchezian and M.P. Kumar, Cryogenic Turning of the Ti–6Al–4V Alloy with Modified Cutting Tool Inserts, Cryogenics, 2011, 51(1), p 34–40.10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.10.011 ↗
26. K.A. Al-Ghamdi, A. Iqbal, and G. Hussain, Machinability Comparison of AISI 4340 and Ti-6Al-4V Under Cryogenic and Hybrid Cooling Environments: A Knowledge Engineering Approach, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2015, 229(12), p 2144–2164.10.1177/0954405414548496 ↗
27. A. Shokrani, V. Dhokia, and S.T. Newman, Investigation of the Effects of Cryogenic Machining on Surface Integrity in CNC End Milling of Ti–6Al–4V Titanium Alloy, J. Manuf. Process., 2016, 21, p 172–179.10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.12.002 ↗
28. A. Iqbal, H. Suhaimi, W. Zhao, M. Jamil, M.M. Nauman, N. He, and J. Zaini, Sustainable Milling of Ti-6Al-4V: Investigating the Effects of Milling Orientation, Cutter’s Helix Angle, and Type of Cryogenic Coolant, Metals, 2020, 10(2), p 258.10.3390/met10020258 ↗
29. J. Schoop, W.F. Sales, and I.S. Jawahir, High Speed Cryogenic Finish Machining of Ti-6Al4V with Polycrystalline Diamond Tools, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, 250, p 1–8.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.002 ↗
30. M.I. Sadik and S. Isakson, The Role of PVD Coating and Coolant Nature in Wear Development and Tool Performance in Cryogenic and Wet Milling of Ti-6Al-4V, Wear, 2017, 386, p 204–210.10.1016/j.wear.2017.02.049 ↗
31. A. Bordin, S. Sartori, S. Bruschi, and A. Ghiotti, Experimental Investigation on the Feasibility of Dry and Cryogenic Machining as Sustainable Strategies When Turning Ti6Al4V Produced by Additive Manufacturing, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 142, p 4142–4151.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.209 ↗
32. M. Danish, M.K. Gupta, S. Rubaiee, A. Ahmed, A. Mahfouz, and M. Jamil, Machinability Investigations on CFRP Composites: A Comparison between Sustainable Cooling Conditions, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, 114, p 3201–3216.10.1007/s00170-021-07073-8 ↗
33. P. Sharma, K. Kishore, V. Singh, and M.K. Sinha, Optimization of Process Parameters for Better Surface Morphology of Electrical Discharge Machining-Processed Inconel 825 Using Hybrid Response Surface Methodology-Desirability Function and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Approaches, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08751-210.1007/s11665-023-08751-2 ↗
34. M.K. Sinha, K. Kishore, Kishore, and R. Kumar, Hybrid Approach for Modelling and Optimizing MQL Grinding of Inconel 625 with Machine Learning and MCDM Techniques, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01738-w10.1007/s12008-024-01738-w ↗
35. F. Pan, Q. Zhang, J. Liu, W. Li, and Q. Gao, Consensus Analysis for a Class of Stochastic PSO Algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput., 2014, 23, p 567–578.10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.010 ↗
36. G. Li, P. Niu, W. Zhang, and Y. Liu, Model NOx Emissions by Least Squares Support Vector Machine with Tuning Based on Ameliorated Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2013, 126, p 11–20.10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.04.012 ↗
37. K. Yu, X. Wang, and Z. Wang, Self-Adaptive Multi-Objective Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization and its Application in Ethylene Cracking Furnace Operation Optimization, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2015, 146, p 198–210.10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.05.015 ↗
38. D. Chen, F. Zou, Z. Li, J. Wang, and S. Li, An Improved Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm for Solving Global Optimization Problem, Inf. Sci., 2015, 297, p 171–190.10.1016/j.ins.2014.11.001 ↗
39. F. Soffel, D. Eisenbarth, E. Hosseini, and K. Wegener, Interface Strength and Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 Processed Sequentially by Casting, Milling, and Direct Metal Deposition, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2021, 291, 117021.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.117021 ↗
40. K.K. Gajrani, P.S. Suvin, S.V. Kailas, and R.S. Mamilla, Thermal, Rheological, Wettability and Hard Machining Performance of MoS2 and CaF2 Based Minimum Quantity Hybrid Nano-Green Cutting Fluids, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 266, p 125–139.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.036 ↗
41. N. Srinivas and K. Deb, Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms, Evol. Comput., 1994, 2(3), p 221–248.10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221 ↗
42. M. Tian, X. Gong, L. Yin, H. Li, W. Ming, Z. Zhang, and J. Chen, Multi-objective Optimization of Injection Molding Process Parameters in Two Stages for Multiple Quality Characteristics and Energy Efficiency Using Taguchi Method and NSGA-II, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 89, p 241–254.10.1007/s00170-016-9065-7 ↗
43. M. Gen and L. Lin, Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm for Manufacturing Scheduling Problems: State-of-the-Art Survey, J. Intell. Manuf., 2014, 25, p 849–866.10.1007/s10845-013-0804-4 ↗
44. B. Sen, M. Mia, U.K. Mandal, B. Dutta, and S.P. Mondal, Multi-Objective Optimization for MQL-Assisted End Milling Operation: An Intelligent Hybrid Strategy Combining GEP and NTOPSIS, Neural Comput. Appl., 2019, 31, p 8693–8717.10.1007/s00521-019-04450-z ↗
45. D.F. Pires, C.H. Antunes, and A.G. Martins, NSGA-II with Local Search for a Multi-Objective Reactive Power Compensation Problem, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2012, 43(1), p 313–324.10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.024 ↗
46. R.V. Rao, V.J. Savsani, and D.P. Vakharia, Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization: A Novel Method for Constrained Mechanical Design Optimization Problems, Comput. Aided Des., 2011, 43(3), p 303–315.10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.015 ↗
47. R.V. Rao, V.J. Savsani, and D.P. Vakharia, Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization: An Optimization Method for Continuous Non-Linear Large Scale Problems, Inf. Sci., 2012, 183(1), p 1–15.10.1016/j.ins.2011.08.006 ↗
48. F. Zou, D. Chen, and Q. Xu, A Survey of Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization, Neurocomputing, 2019, 335, p 366–383.10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.076 ↗
49. M. Akhlaghi, Optimization of the Plasmonic Nano-Rods-Based Absorption Coefficient Using TLBO Algorithm, Optik, 2015, 126(24), p 5033–5037.10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.09.057 ↗
50. H.H. Habeeb, K.A. Abou-El-Hossein, B. Mohammad, and K. Kadirgama, Effect of Tool Holder Geometry and Cutting Condition When Milling Nickel-Based Alloy 242, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 201(1–3), p 483–485.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.154 ↗
51. E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang, and A.R. Machado, The Machinability Of Nickel-Based Alloys: A Review, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999, 86(1–3), p 1–16.10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00314-8 ↗
52. Q. Wu, X. Zhou, and X. Pan, Cutting Tool Wear Monitoring in Milling Processes by Integrating Deep Residual Convolution Network and Gated Recurrent Unit with an Attention Mechanism, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2023, 237(8), p 1171–1181.10.1177/09544054221124476 ↗
53. F. Zhang, F. Xu, X. Zhou, K. Ding, S. Shao, C. Du, and J. Leng, Data-Driven and Knowledge-Guided Prediction Model of Milling Tool Life Grade, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 2024, 37(6), p 669–684.10.1080/0951192X.2023.2257620 ↗
54. M. Olsson, V. Akujärvi, J.E. Ståhl, and V. Bushlya, Cryogenic and Hybrid Induction-Assisted Machining Strategies as Alternatives for Conventional Machining of Refractory Tungsten and Niobium, Int. J. Refract Metal Hard Mater., 2021, 97, 105520.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2021.105520 ↗
55. N. Khanna and P. Shah, Comparative Analysis of Dry, Flood, MQL and Cryogenic CO2 Techniques during the Machining of 15-5-PH SS Alloy, Tribol. Int., 2020, 146, 106196.10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106196 ↗
56. M. Jamil, A.M. Khan, M.K. Gupta, M. Mia, N. He, L. Li, and V. Sivalingam, Influence of CO2-Snow and Subzero MQL on Thermal Aspects in the Machining of Ti-6Al-4V, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2020, 177, 115480.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115480 ↗
57. Y. Zhao, Stability of Phase Boundary between L12-Ni3Al Phases: A Phase Field Study, Intermetallics, 2022, 144, 107528.10.1016/j.intermet.2022.107528 ↗
58. X. Xu, Y. Hao, R. Dong, H. Hou, and Y. Zhao, Effect of Undercooling on Microstructure Evolution of Cu Based Alloys, J. Alloy. Compd., 2023, 935, 167998.10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167998 ↗