journal article·2023-05

Exploring Deep Learning Methods to Forecast Mechanical Behavior of FSW Aluminum Sheets

Abdelhakim Dorbane, Fouzi Harrou, Ying Sun

Publisher page

Abstract

This work aimed to develop effective data-driven approaches to forecast the stress–strain curves of Al6061-T6 aluminum alloy base material and welded using Friction Stir Welding (FSW) technique under different temperature conditions. Accurate forecasting of the material’s behavior is undoubtedly essential to predict the mechanical piece’s life span under different working conditions and get relevant information, such as strain softening and material characteristics. Importantly, two deep learning models were investigated, namely long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU). This choice is motivated by the capacity of LSTM and GRU to learn temporal dependencies from time-series data. In addition, these deep learning-driven methods promise forecasting results but require no assumptions on the data distributions. According to the existing literature, this is the first study introducing the LSTM and GRU models to forecast the stress–strain curves effectively. Experiments have been conducted using Al6061-T6 aluminum alloy and FSW joining process under different temperature levels: 25, 100, 200, and 300 °C. Forecasting results demonstrated LSTM and GRU models’ promising capacity to capture the future trends of stress–strain curves under different temperature conditions. In terms of efficiency and accuracy, the GRU-driven forecasting approach converges faster and exhibits better performance than the LSTM approach. ; This publication is based upon work supported by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) under Award No.: OSR-2019-CRG7-3800.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Dwight, Aluminium Design and Construction, CRC Press, Cambridge, 1998.10.4324/9780203028193 ↗
2. J.A. Al-Jarrah, S. Swalha, T.A. Mansour, M. Ibrahim, M. Al-Rashdan and D.A. Al-Qahsi, Welding Equality and Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloys Joints Prepared by Friction Stir Welding, Mater. Des., 2014, 56, p 929–936.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.003 ↗
3. A.K. Jha, S.V.S.N. Murty, V. Diwakar and K.S. Kumar, Metallurgical Analysis of Cracking in Weldment of Propellant Tank, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2003, 10(3), p 265–273.10.1016/S1350-6307(02)00073-0 ↗
4. W.M. Thomas, E.D. Nicholas, J.C. Needham, M.G. Murch, P. Temple-Smith, and C.J. Dawes, “Friction Welding,” Google Patents, 1995.
5. R.D. Fu, R.C. Sun, F.C. Zhang and H.J. Liu, Improvement of Formation Quality for Friction Stir Welded Joints, Weld. J, 2012, 91, p 169–173.
6. A. Dorbane, G. Ayoub, B. Mansoor, R.F. Hamade and A. Imad, Effect of Temperature on Microstructure and Fracture Mechanisms in Friction Stir Welded Al6061 Joints, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26(6), p 2542–2554.10.1007/s11665-017-2704-9 ↗
7. J.Q. Su, T.W. Nelson, R. Mishra and M. Mahoney, Microstructural Investigation of Friction Stir Welded 7050–T651 Aluminium, Acta Mater., 2003, 51(3), p 713–729.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00449-4 ↗
8. J.-Q. Su, T.W. Nelson and C.J. Sterling, Microstructure Evolution during FSW/FSP of High Strength Aluminum Alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 405(1–2), p 277–286.10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.009 ↗
9. D.A. Wadeson, X. Zhou, G.E. Thompson, P. Skeldon, L.D. Oosterkamp and G. Scamans, Corrosion Behaviour of Friction Stir Welded AA7108 T79 Aluminium Alloy, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48(4), p 887–897.10.1016/j.corsci.2005.02.020 ↗
10. D. Li, X. Yang, L. Cui, F. He and H. Shen, Effect of Welding Parameters on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AA6061-T6 Butt Welded Joints by Stationary Shoulder Friction Stir Welding, Mater. Des., 2014, 64, p 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.04610.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.046 ↗
11. F. Nadeau, B. Thériault, and M.O. Gagné, Machine Learning Models Applied to Friction Stir Welding Defect Index Using Multiple Joint Configurations and Alloys, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., 2020.10.1177/1464420720917415 ↗
12. R. Vignjevic, J. Campbell, J. Jaric and S. Powell, Derivation of SPH Equations in a Moving Referential Coordinate System, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2009, 198(30), p 2403–2411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.02.02710.1016/j.cma.2009.02.027 ↗
13. R. Vignjevic, N. Djordjevic, T. De Vuyst and S. Gemkow, Modelling of Strain Softening Materials Based on Equivalent Damage Force, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2018, 335, p 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.04910.1016/j.cma.2018.01.049 ↗
14. K. Elangovan, V. Balasubramanian and S. Babu, Predicting Tensile Strength of Friction Stir Welded AA6061 Aluminium Alloy Joints by a Mathematical Model, Mater. Des., 2009, 30, p 188–193.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.037 ↗
15. S. Rajakumar, C. Muralidharan and V. Balasubramanian, Predicting Tensile Strength, Hardness and Corrosion Rate of Friction Stir Welded AA6061-T6 Aluminium Alloy Joints, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 2878–2890.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.025 ↗
16. S. Nasiri and M. Reza, Machine Learning in Predicting Mechanical Behavior of Additively Manufactured Parts, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, 14, p 1137–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.004 ↗
17. N.N. Vlassis, R. Ma and W.C. Sun, Geometric Deep Learning for Computational Mechanics Part I: Anisotropic Hyperelasticity, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2020, 371, p 113299.10.1016/j.cma.2020.113299 ↗
18. N.N. Vlassis, P. Zhao, R. Ma, T. Sewell, and W. Sun, Molecular Dynamics Inferred Transfer Learning Models for Finite-Strain Hyperelasticity of Monoclinic Crystals: Sobolev Training and Validations against Physical Constraints, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6992.10.1002/nme.6992 ↗
19. P. Charalampous, N. Kladovasilakis, I. Kostavelis, K. Tsongas, D. Tzetzis and D. Tzovaras, Machine Learning-Based Mechanical Behavior Optimization of 3D Print Constructs Manufactured Via the FFF Process, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31(6), p 4697–4706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06535-010.1007/s11665-021-06535-0 ↗
20. H. Okuyucu, A. Kurt and E. Arcaklioglu, Artificial Neural Network Application to the Friction Stir Welding of Aluminum Plates, Mater. Des., 2007, 28, p 78–84.10.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.003 ↗
21. M.G. Na, J.W. Kim, D.H. Lim and Y.-J. Kang, Residual Stress Prediction of Dissimilar Metals Welding at NPPs Using Support Vector Regression, Nucl. Eng. Des., 2008, 238(7), p 1503–1510.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.12.003 ↗
22. Y. Wang, Y. Sun, P. Lv and H. Wang, Detection of Line Weld Defects Based on Multiple Thresholds and Support Vector Machine, Ndt E Int., 2008, 41(7), p 517–524.10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.05.004 ↗
23. M. Paulic, D. Mocnik, M. Ficko, J. Balic, T. Irgolic and S. Klancnik, Inteligentni Sustav Za Predviđanje Mehaničkih Svojstava Materijala Na Osnovu Metalografskih Slika, Teh. Vjesn., 2015, 22(6), p 1419–1424.
24. N.D. Ghetiya and K.M. Patel, Prediction of Tensile Strength in Friction Stir Welded Aluminium Alloy Using Artificial Neural Network, Procedia Technol., 2014, 14, p 274–281.10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.036 ↗
25. S. Verma, M. Gupta, and J.P. Misra, Performance Evaluation of Friction Stir Welding Using Machine Learning Approaches, MethodsX, 2018.10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.002 ↗
26. F. Harrou, Y. Sun, A.S. Hering and M. Madakyaru, and others, “Statistical Process Monitoring Using Advanced Data-Driven and Deep Learning Approaches: Theory and Practical Applications,” Elsevier, New York, 2020.
27. T. Cheng, F. Harrou, F. Kadri, Y. Sun and T. Leiknes, Forecasting of Wastewater Treatment Plant Key Features Using Deep Learning-Based Models: A Case Study, IEEE Access, 2020, 8, p 184475–184485.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030820 ↗
28. A. Dairi, F. Harrou, S. Khadraoui and Y. Sun, Integrated Multiple Directed Attention-Based Deep Learning for Improved Air Pollution Forecasting, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2021, 70, p 1–15.10.1109/TIM.2021.3091511 ↗
29. F. Harrou, T. Cheng, Y. Sun, T. Leiknes and N. Ghaffour, A Data-Driven Soft Sensor to Forecast Energy Consumption in Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Case Study, IEEE Sens. J., 2020, 21(4), p 4908–4917.10.1109/JSEN.2020.3030584 ↗
30. A. Oishi and G. Yagawa, Computational Mechanics Enhanced by Deep Learning, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2017, 327, p 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.04010.1016/j.cma.2017.08.040 ↗
31. J. Jung, K. Yoon and P.-S. Lee, Deep Learned Finite Elements, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2020, 372, 113401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11340110.1016/j.cma.2020.113401 ↗
32. R.E. Sanders and R. Sanders Jr., Technology Innovation in Aluminum Products, JOM, 2001, 53(2), p 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0115-710.1007/s11837-001-0115-7 ↗
33. F. Harrou, M.M. Hittawe, Y. Sun and O. Beya, Malicious Attacks Detection in Crowded Areas Using Deep Learning-Based Approach, IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag., 2020, 23(5), p 57–62.10.1109/MIM.2020.9153576 ↗
34. W. Wang, J. Lee, F. Harrou and Y. Sun, Early Detection of Parkinson’s Disease Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning, IEEE Access, 2020, 8, p 147635–147646.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016062 ↗
35. ASTM-B308/B308M-10, Standard Specification for Aluminum-Alloy 6061–T6 Standard Structural Profile, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2010.
36. ASTM-E8/E8M, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, www.Astm.Org.,” (West Conshohocken, PA), ASTM International, 2015, p 1–27,https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-15A10.1520/E0008_E0008M-15A ↗
37. ASTM-E21, “Standard Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, www.Astm.Org.,” (West Conshohocken, PA), ASTM International, 2009, p 1–8,https://doi.org/10.1520/E0021-09.210.1520/E0021-09.2 ↗
38. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens, E3−11, ASTM Int., 2012.
39. G. Dorffner, Neural Networks for Time Series Processing, Neural Netw. World, 1996.
40. A.S. Ashour, A. El-Attar, N. Dey, H.A. El-Kader and M.M.A. El-Naby, Long Short Term Memory Based Patient-Dependent Model for FOG Detection in Parkinson’s Disease, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2020, 131, p 23–29.10.1016/j.patrec.2019.11.036 ↗
41. F. Harrou, F. Kadri, and Y. Sun, Forecasting of Photovoltaic Solar Power Production Using LSTM Approach, Advanced Statistical Modeling, Forecasting, and Fault Detection in Renewable Energy Systems, IntechOpen, 2020.10.5772/intechopen.91248 ↗
42. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, Long Short-Term Memory, Neural Comput., 1997, 9(8), p 1735–1780.10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
43. F.A. Gers, J. Schmidhuber and F. Cummins, Learning to Forget: Continual Prediction with LSTM, Neural Comput., 2000, 12, p 2451–2471.10.1162/089976600300015015 ↗
44. H. Salehinejad, S. Sankar, J. Barfett, E. Colak, and S. Valaee, “Recent Advances in Recurrent Neural Networks,” arXiv, 2018, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1801.01078.10.48550/ARXIV.1801.01078 ↗
45. F. Harrou, Y. Sun, A.S. Hering, M. Madakyaru, and A. Dairi, Unsupervised Recurrent Deep Learning Scheme for Process Monitoring, Statistical Process Monitoring Using Advanced Data-Driven and Deep Learning Approaches, Elsevier BV, 2021, p 225–253.10.1016/B978-0-12-819365-5.00013-9 ↗
46. Z. Cui, R. Ke, Z. Pu, and Y. Wang, Deep Bidirectional and Unidirectional LSTM Recurrent Neural Network for Network-Wide Traffic Speed Prediction, arXiv, 2018, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1801.02143.10.48550/ARXIV.1801.02143 ↗
47. J. Chung, C. Gulcehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling, arXiv Prepr. arXiv:1412.3555, 2014.
48. K. Cho, B. Van Merriënboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares, H. Schwenk, and Y. Bengio, “Learning Phrase Representations Using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation,” EMNLP 2014—2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 2014.10.3115/v1/D14-1179 ↗
49. W.C. Lin and C.F. Tsai, Missing Value Imputation: A Review and Analysis of the Literature (2006–2017), Artif. Intell. Rev., 2020, 53(2), p 1487–1509.10.1007/s10462-019-09709-4 ↗
50. R. Zettler, T. Vugrin, and M. Schmücker, Effects and Defects of Friction Stir Welds, Friction Stir Welding, Elsevier, 2010, p 245–27610.1533/9781845697716.2.245 ↗
51. W.J. Arbegast, A Flow-Partitioned Deformation Zone Model for Defect Formation during Friction Stir Welding, Scr. Mater., 2008, 58(5), p 372–376.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.031 ↗
52. B. Heinz and B. Skrotzki, Characterization of a Friction-Stir-Welded Aluminum Alloy 6013, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2002, 33, p 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-002-0059-5LB-ref110.1007/s11663-002-0059-5LB-ref1 ↗
53. A. Dorbane, G. Ayoub, B. Mansoor, R. Hamade, G. Kridli and A. Imad, Observations of the Mechanical Response and Evolution of Damage of AA 6061–T6 under Different Strain Rates and Temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 624, p 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.07410.1016/j.msea.2014.11.074 ↗
54. G.E.P. Box, G.M. Jenkins, G.C. Reinsel and G.M. Ljung, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Wiley, Hoboken, 2015.