Energy Absorption Characteristics of Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printed Auxetic Re-entrant Structures: A Review
Source abstract
Abstract
This article summarizes the latest advances in manufacturing of negative Poisson’s ratio materials, so-called auxetic materials, their structural mechanics and energy absorption capabilities. Diverse examples of application of these materials have been provided. Due to their excellent energy absorption capability and functional performance, these materials have generated significant interest in several applications including medical implants, automobile and sport items. It is possible to tailor their macroscopic properties by tuning the architectural features at the meso-scale, thanks to developments in 3D printing technologies. The current research is dominated by auxetic materials with periodic or ordered microstructures. The main focus of this review paper is to discuss the progress in energy absorption performance of re-entrant structures manufactured by fused deposition modeling 3D printing process. After highlighting the knowledge gaps in existing literature, this review provides an outlook on the possible future research. It is expected to gain new insights into the design and modeling of re-entrant structures for different industrial applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. X. Ren, R. Das, P. Tran et al., Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review, Smart Mater. Struct., 2018, 27, p 23001.10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c ↗
2. S. Linforth, T. Ngo, P. Tran et al., Investigation of the auxetic oval structure for energy absorption through quasi-static and dynamic experiments, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2021, 147, p 103741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10374110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103741 ↗
3. L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
4. M. Askari, D.A. Hutchins, P.J. Thomas et al., Additive manufacturing of metamaterials: a review, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 36, p 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10156210.1016/j.addma.2020.101562 ↗
5. K.E. Evans, M.A. Nkansah, I.J. Hutchinson, and S.C. Rogers, Molecular network design, Nature, 1991, 353, p 124.10.1038/353124a0 ↗
6. F. Robert, An isotropic three-dimensional structure with Poisson’s ratio=- 1, J. Elast., 1985, 15, p 427–430.10.1007/BF00042531 ↗
7. Q.M. Li, I. Magkiriadis, and J.J. Harrigan, Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids, J. Cell Plast., 2006, 42, p 371–392.10.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
8. X. Zhang, H. Hao, R. Tian et al., Quasi-static compression and dynamic crushing behaviors of novel hybrid re-entrant auxetic metamaterials with enhanced energy-absorption, Compos. Struct., 2022, 288, p 115399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11539910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115399 ↗
9. W. Zhang, S. Zhao, F. Scarpa et al., In-plane mechanical behavior of novel auxetic hybrid metamaterials, Thin-Walled Struct., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.10719110.1016/j.tws.2020.107191 ↗
10. C. Qi, F. Jiang, A. Remennikov et al., Quasi-static crushing behavior of novel re-entrant circular auxetic honeycombs, Compos. Part B Eng., 2020, 197, p 108117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10811710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108117 ↗
11. J. Zhang, G. Lu, and Z. You, Large deformation and energy absorption of additively manufactured auxetic materials and structures: a review, Compos. Part B Eng., 2020, 201, p 108340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10834010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108340 ↗
12. A. Alomarah, D. Ruan, and S. Masood, Tensile properties of an auxetic structure with re-entrant and chiral features—a finite element study, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 99, p 2425–2440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2637-y10.1007/s00170-018-2637-y ↗
13. D. Li, J. Yin, L. Dong, and R.S. Lakes, Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio, J. Mater. Sci., 2018, 53, p 3493–3499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1809-810.1007/s10853-017-1809-8 ↗
14. A. Ingrole, A. Hao, and R. Liang, Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement, Mater. Des., 2017, 117, p 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.06710.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.067 ↗
15. L.J. Gibson and F.M. Ashby [Lorna_J._Gibson,_Michael_F._Ashby]_Cellular_Solid(z-lib.org).pdf. Cambridge Solid State Sci. Ser. (1997)10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
16. C. Quan, B. Han, Z. Hou et al., 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite auxetic honeycomb structures, Compos. Part B Eng., 2020, 18, p 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10785810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107858 ↗
17. L. Bai, C. Gong, X. Chen et al., Mechanical properties and energy absorption capabilities of functionally graded lattice structures: experiments and simulations, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10573510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105735 ↗
18. A. Alomarah, S.H. Masood, I. Sbarski et al., Compressive properties of 3D printed auxetic structures: experimental and numerical studies, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2020, 15, p 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.164418410.1080/17452759.2019.1644184 ↗
19. Z. Dong, Y. Li, T. Zhao et al., Experimental and numerical studies on the compressive mechanical properties of the metallic auxetic reentrant honeycomb, Mater. Des., 2019, 182, p 108036.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108036 ↗
20. J.X. Qiao and C.Q. Chen, Impact resistance of uniform and functionally graded auxetic double arrowhead honeycombs, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2015, 83, p 47–58.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.04.005 ↗
21. W.M. Zhang, Z.Y. Li, J.S. Yang et al., A lightweight rotationally arranged auxetic structure with excellent energy absorption performance, Mech. Mater., 2022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.10424410.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104244 ↗
22. M. Najafi, H. Ahmadi, and G. Liaghat, Experimental investigation on energy absorption of auxetic structures, Mater. Today Proc., 2019, 34, p 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.07510.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.075 ↗
23. A. Alomarah, S.H. Masood, and D. Ruan, Out-of-plane and in-plane compression of additively manufactured auxetic structures, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2020, 106, p 106107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.10610710.1016/j.ast.2020.106107 ↗
24. T. Wang, L. Wang, Z. Ma, and G.M. Hulbert, Elastic analysis of auxetic cellular structure consisting of re-entrant hexagonal cells using a strain-based expansion homogenization method, Mater. Des., 2018, 160, p 284–293.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.013 ↗
25. T. Baran and M. Öztürk, In-plane elasticity of a strengthened re-entrant honeycomb cell, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.10403710.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.104037 ↗
26. S. Vyavahare and S. Kumar, Numerical and experimental investigation of FDM fabricated re-entrant auxetic structures of ABS and PLA materials under compressive loading, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2021, 27, p 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2019-027110.1108/RPJ-10-2019-0271 ↗
27. K. Zied, M. Osman, and T. Elmahdy, Enhancement of the in-plane stiffness of the hexagonal re-entrant auxetic honeycomb cores, Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res., 2015, 252, p 2685–2692. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20155216410.1002/pssb.201552164 ↗
28. L. Yang, O. Harrysson, H. West, and D. Cormier, Modeling of uniaxial compression in a 3D periodic re-entrant lattice structure, J. Mater. Sci., 2013, 48, p 1413–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6892-210.1007/s10853-012-6892-2 ↗
29. N.K. Choudhry, B. Panda, and S. Kumar, In-plane energy absorption characteristics of a modified re-entrant auxetic structure fabricated via 3D printing, Compos. Part B Eng., 2022, 228, p 109437.10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109437 ↗
30. N.K. Choudhry and B. Panda B, in Mechanical properties of 3D printed modified auxetic structure: experimental and finite element study. Low cost manufacturing technologies: proceedings of NERC 2022. (Springer, 2023), pp. 189–20010.1007/978-981-19-8452-5_16 ↗
31. Z.X. Lu, X. Li, Z.Y. Yang, and F. Xie, Novel structure with negative Poisson’s ratio and enhanced Young’s modulus, Compos. Struct., 2016, 138, p 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.036 ↗
32. Y. Zhu, Y. Luo, D. Gao et al., In-plane elastic properties of a novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with zigzag inclined ligaments, Eng. Struct., 2022, 268, p 114788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11478810.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114788 ↗
33. Z. Chen, X. Wu, Y.M. Xie et al., Re-entrant auxetic lattices with enhanced stiffness: a numerical study, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10561910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105619 ↗
34. X. Li, Q. Wang, Z. Yang, and Z. Lu, Novel auxetic structures with enhanced mechanical properties, Extrem. Mech. Lett., 2019, 27, p 59–65.10.1016/j.eml.2019.01.002 ↗
35. N.K. Choudhry, B. Panda, and S. Kumar, Enhanced energy absorption performance of 3D printed 2D auxetic lattices, Thin-Walled Struct., 2023, 186, p 110650.10.1016/j.tws.2023.110650 ↗
36. V.S. Deshpande and N.A. Fleck, Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2000, 48, p 1253–1283.10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
37. M.H. Fu, Y. Chen, and L.L. Hu, A novel auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane stiffness and buckling strength, Compos. Struct., 2017, 160, p 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.09010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.090 ↗
38. L. Boldrin, S. Hummel, F. Scarpa et al., Dynamic behaviour of auxetic gradient composite hexagonal honeycombs, Compos. Struct., 2016, 149, p 114–124.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.044 ↗
39. Y. Jiang and Y. Li, 3D printed auxetic mechanical metamaterial with chiral cells and re-entrant cores, Sci. Rep., 2018, 8, p 1–11.
40. N. Novak, L. Krstulović-Opara, Z. Ren, and M. Vesenjak, Compression and shear behaviour of graded chiral auxetic structures, Mech. Mater., 2020, 148, p 103524.10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103524 ↗
41. M.-H. Fu, Y. Chen, and L.-L. Hu, Bilinear elastic characteristic of enhanced auxetic honeycombs, Compos. Struct., 2017, 175, p 101–110.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.007 ↗
42. C.J. Shen, G. Lu, and T.X. Yu, Dynamic behavior of graded honeycombs–a finite element study, Compos. Struct., 2013, 98, p 282–293.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.002 ↗
43. J. Plocher and A. Panesar, Effect of density and unit cell size grading on the stiffness and energy absorption of short fibre-reinforced functionally graded lattice structures, Addit. Manuf., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10117110.1016/j.addma.2020.101171 ↗
44. X. Wu, Y. Su, and J. Shi, In-plane impact resistance enhancement with a graded cell-wall angle design for auxetic metamaterials, Compos. Struct., 2020, 247, p 112451.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112451 ↗
45. B. Yu, B. Han, P.-B. Su et al., Graded square honeycomb as sandwich core for enhanced mechanical performance, Mater. Des., 2016, 89, p 642–652.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.154 ↗
46. R. Yu, W. Luo, H. Yuan et al., Experimental and numerical research on foam filled re-entrant cellular structure with negative Poisson’s ratio, Thin-Walled Struct., 2020, 153, p 106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.10667910.1016/j.tws.2020.106679 ↗
47. X. Ren, Y. Zhang, C.Z. Han et al., Mechanical properties of foam-filled auxetic circular tubes: experimental and numerical study, Thin-Walled Struct., 2022, 170, p 108584.10.1016/j.tws.2021.108584 ↗
48. F. Albertini, J. Dirrenberger, C. Sollogoub et al., Experimental and computational analysis of the mechanical properties of composite auxetic lattice structures, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 47, p 102351.
49. Y. Xue, W. Wang, and F. Han, Enhanced compressive mechanical properties of aluminum based auxetic lattice structures filled with polymers, Compos. Part B Eng., 2019, 171, p 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.002 ↗
50. N. Novak, L. Krstulović-Opara, Z. Ren, and M. Vesenjak, Mechanical properties of hybrid metamaterial with auxetic chiral cellular structure and silicon filler, Compos. Struct., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11171810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111718 ↗
51. H.C. Luo, X. Ren, Y. Zhang et al., Mechanical properties of foam-filled hexagonal and re-entrant honeycombs under uniaxial compression, Compos. Struct., 2022, 280, p 114922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11492210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114922 ↗
52. H.H. Xu, H.C. Luo, X.G. Zhang et al., Mechanical properties of aluminum foam filled re-entrant honeycomb with uniform and gradient designs, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2023, 244, p 108075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10807510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.108075 ↗
53. S. Wang, Y. Wang, F. Yu et al., Evaluation of in-plane crushing performance of printed randomly polymeric honeycombs filled with foamed concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 2021, 310, p 125291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12529110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125291 ↗
54. V. Nguyen-Van, N.K. Choudhry, B. Panda et al., Performance of concrete beam reinforced with 3D printed Bioinspired primitive scaffold subjected to three-point bending, Autom. Constr., 2022, 134, p 104060.10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104060 ↗
55. H.Y. Sarvestani, A.H. Akbarzadeh, H. Niknam, and K. Hermenean, 3D printed architected polymeric sandwich panels: energy absorption and structural performance, Compos. Struct., 2018, 200, p 886–909.10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.002 ↗
56. S. Hou, T. Li, Z. Jia, and L. Wang, Mechanical properties of sandwich composites with 3d-printed auxetic and non-auxetic lattice cores under low velocity impact, Mater. Des., 2018, 160, p 1305–1321.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.002 ↗
57. D. Xiao, X. Chen, Y. Li et al., The structure response of sandwich beams with metallic auxetic honeycomb cores under localized impulsive loading-experiments and finite element analysis, Mater. Des., 2019, 176, p 107840.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107840 ↗
58. H. Jiang, H. Ziegler, Z. Zhang et al., Bending behavior of 3D printed mechanically robust tubular lattice metamaterials, Addit. Manuf., 2021, 50, p 102565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10256510.1016/j.addma.2021.102565 ↗
59. N.K. Choudhry, S.R. Bankar, B. Panda, and H. Singh, Experimental and numerical analysis of the bending behavior of 3D printed modified auxetic sandwich structures, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 56, p 1356–1363.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.425 ↗
60. A. Beharic, R.R. Egui, and L. Yang, Drop-weight impact characteristics of additively manufactured sandwich structures with different cellular designs, Mater. Des., 2018, 145, p 122–134.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.066 ↗
61. H.L. Tan, Z.C. He, E. Li et al., Energy absorption characteristics of three-layered sandwich panels with graded re-entrant hierarchical honeycombs cores, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.10607310.1016/j.ast.2020.106073 ↗
62. Z.-D. Ma, H. Bian, C. Sun, G.M. Hulbert, K. Bishnoi, F. Rostam-Abadi, Functionally-graded NPR (negative Poisson’s ratio) material for a blast-protective deflector. in NDIA Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposium Modeling & Simulation, Testing and Validation (MSTV) Mini-Symposium, Dearborn, Michigan, 2010
63. L. Ji, W. Hu, R. Tao et al., Compression behavior of the 4D printed reentrant honeycomb: experiment and finite element analysis, Smart Mater. Struct., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ababe410.1088/1361-665X/ababe4 ↗
64. M. Wagner, T. Chen, and K. Shea, Large shape transforming 4D auxetic structures, 3D Print Addit. Manuf., 2017, 4, p 133–142.10.1089/3dp.2017.0027 ↗
65. F. Momeni, X. Liu, J. Ni et al., A review of 4D printing, Mater. Des., 2017, 122, p 42–79.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.068 ↗
66. M.H. Yousuf, W. Abuzaid, and M. Alkhader, 4D printed auxetic structures with tunable mechanical properties, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 35, p 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10136410.1016/j.addma.2020.101364 ↗
67. T.R. Giri and R.W. Mailen, Thermomechanical behavior of polymeric periodic structures, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 49, p 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10251210.1016/j.addma.2021.102512 ↗
68. K. Liu, L. Han, W. Hu et al., 4D printed zero Poisson’s ratio metamaterial with switching function of mechanical and vibration isolation performance, Mater. Des., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10915310.1016/j.matdes.2020.109153 ↗
69. M. Bodaghi, A.R. Damanpack, and W.H. Liao, Adaptive metamaterials by functionally graded 4D printing, Mater. Des., 2017, 135, p 26–36.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.069 ↗
70. M. Bodaghi, A.R. Damanpack, and W.H. Liao, Triple shape memory polymers by 4D printing, Smart Mater. Struct., 2018, 27, p 65010.10.1088/1361-665X/aabc2a ↗
71. M. Bodaghi and W.H. Liao, 4D printed tunable mechanical metamaterials with shape memory operations, Smart Mater. Struct., 2019, 28, p 45019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab0b6b10.1088/1361-665X/ab0b6b ↗
72. J. Fish, Practical Multiscaling, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2013.
73. R.R. Madke and R. Chowdhury, A multiscale continuum model for inelastic behavior of woven composite, Compos. Struct., 2019, 226, p 111267.10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111267 ↗
74. M.H. Fu, O.T. Xu, L.L. Hu, and T.X. Yu, Nonlinear shear modulus of re-entrant hexagonal honeycombs under large deformation, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2016, 80, p 284–296.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.11.015 ↗
75. J. Zhang, G. Lu, D. Ruan, and Z. Wang, Tensile behavior of an auxetic structure: analytical modeling and finite element analysis, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2018, 136, p 143–154.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.029 ↗
76. J. Dirrenberger, S. Forest, and D. Jeulin, Effective elastic properties of auxetic microstructures: anisotropy and structural applications, Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des., 2013, 9, p 21–33.10.1007/s10999-012-9192-8 ↗
77. J. Dirrenberger, S. Forest, and D. Jeulin, Elastoplasticity of auxetic materials, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2012, 64, p 57–61.10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.036 ↗
78. C. Lira, P. Innocenti, and F. Scarpa, Transverse elastic shear of auxetic multi re-entrant honeycombs, Compos. Struct., 2009, 90, p 314–322.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.03.009 ↗
79. H. Wan, H. Ohtaki, S. Kotosaka, and G. Hu, A study of negative Poisson’s ratios in auxetic honeycombs based on a large deflection model, Eur. J. Mech., 2004, 23, p 95–106.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.10.006 ↗
80. O. Levy, S. Krylov, and I. Goldfarb, Design considerations for negative Poisson ratio structures under large deflection for MEMS applications, Smart Mater. Struct., 2006, 15, p 1459.10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/035 ↗
81. S. Gonella and M. Ruzzene, Homogenization and equivalent in-plane properties of two-dimensional periodic lattices, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2008, 45, p 2897–2915.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.01.002 ↗
82. N. Chan and K.E. Evans, Microscopic examination of the microstructure and deformation of conventional and auxetic foams, J. Mater. Sci., 1997, 32, p 5725–5736.10.1023/A:1018665617008 ↗
83. Z.-X. Lu, Q. Liu, and Z.-Y. Yang, Predictions of Young’s modulus and negative Poisson’s ratio of auxetic foams, Phys. Status solidi, 2011, 248, p 167–174.10.1002/pssb.201046120 ↗
84. B.B. Babamiri, H. Askari, and K. Hazeli, Deformation mechanisms and post-yielding behavior of additively manufactured lattice structures, Mater. Des., 2020, 188, p 108443.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108443 ↗
85. I. Schmidt and N.A. Fleck, Ductile fracture of two-dimensional cellular structures–dedicated to Prof. Dr.-Ing. D. Gross on the occasion of his 60th birthday, Int. J. Fract., 2001, 111, p 327–342.10.1023/A:1012248030212 ↗
86. N. Kumar, B. Panda, and S. Kumar, Thin-Walled Structures Enhanced energy absorption performance of 3D printed 2D auxetic lattices, Thin-Walled Struct., 2023, 186, p 110650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.11065010.1016/j.tws.2023.110650 ↗
87. Manual ASU (2014) The Abaqus Software is a product of Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. Provid RI, USA Dassault Systèmes, Version 6
88. J. Ruzicka, M. Spaniel, A. Prantl et al., Identification of ductile damage parameters in the ABAQUS, Bull. Appl. Mech., 2012, 8, p 89–92.
89. J. Kramberger, B. Nečemer, and S. Glodež, Assessing the cracking behavior of auxetic cellular structures by using both a numerical and an experimental approach, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2019, 101, p 17–24.10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.02.008 ↗
90. H.J. Böhm, A short introduction to continuum micromechanics. In Mechanics of Microstructured Materials (Springer Vienna, 2004), pp. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2776-6_110.1007/978-3-7091-2776-6_1 ↗
91. A. Anthoine, Derivation of the in-plane elastic characteristics of masonry through homogenization theory, Int. J. Solids Struct., 1995, 32, p 137–163.10.1016/0020-7683(94)00140-R ↗
92. Y. Guo, J. Zhang, L. Chen et al., Deformation behaviors and energy absorption of auxetic lattice cylindrical structures under axial crushing load, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.10566210.1016/j.ast.2019.105662 ↗
93. L.L. Hu, Z.R. Luo, and Q.Y. Yin, Negative Poisson’s ratio effect of re-entrant anti-trichiral honeycombs under large deformation, Thin-Walled Struct., 2019, 141, p 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.03210.1016/j.tws.2019.04.032 ↗
94. W. Zhang, S. Zhao, R. Sun et al., In-plane mechanical behavior of a new star-re-entrant hierarchical metamaterial, Polymers (Basel), 2019 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1107113210.3390/polym11071132 ↗
95. X. Zhao, Q. Gao, L. Wang et al., Dynamic crushing of double-arrowed auxetic structure under impact loading, Mater. Des., 2018, 160, p 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.04110.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.041 ↗
96. CORONAEdgewise compression of novel hexagonal hierarchical and asymmetric unit cells honeycomb metamaterials _ Elsevier Enhanced Reader (1).pdf
97. H. Wang, Z. Lu, Z. Yang, and X. Li, A novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane impact resistance, Compos. Struct., 2019, 208, p 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.024 ↗
98. M. Shokri Rad, H. Hatami, R. Alipouri et al., Determination of energy absorption in different cellular auxetic structures, Mech. Ind., 2019, 20, p 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/201901910.1051/meca/2019019 ↗
99. M.H. Luxner, J. Stampfl, and H.E. Pettermann, Finite element modeling concepts and linear analyses of 3D regular open cell structures, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, 40, p 5859–5866.10.1007/s10853-005-5020-y ↗
100. M.F. Guo, H. Yang, and L. Ma, Design and characterization of 3D AuxHex lattice structures, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10570010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105700 ↗