journal article·2022-09Open access

Optimization of Cutting Conditions, Parameters, and Cryogenic Heat Treatment for Surface Roughness in Milling of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy

Emre Altas, Omer Erkan, Dervis Ozkan, Hasan Gokkaya

Abstract

This study discusses the milling of Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) alloy, one of the innovative and widely used shape memory alloy (SMA). During the face milling operations, the average surface roughness (R-a) was investigated depending on the change in machining parameters, cutting conditions, and cryogenic heat treatment. Experiments were carried out with uncoated and two different coated (PVD, CVD) cutting tools with untreated, shallow (- 80 degrees C) and deep (- 196 degrees C) cryogenic heat treatment. In addition, experiments were carried out using Ethylene Glycol (EG), and boron added Ethylene Glycol (EG+5%BX) cutting fluids as well as dry cutting condition. In the cutting experiments, three different cutting speeds (20-35-50 m/min), three different feeds (0.03-0.07-0.14 mm/tooth), and 0.7 mm fixed cutting depth was used as machining parameters. In the milling mechanism of NiTi shape memory alloys, how the cutting parameters affect the surface quality is discussed in detail. In this context, the cutting parameters were successfully optimized using Taguchi and ANOVA methods. The study is innovative in terms of evaluating the effect of different cutting fluids and cryogenic heat treatment. The results showed that CVD-coated cutting tool, - 196 degrees C cryogenic heat treatment, EG+5%BX cutting fluid, 50 m/min cutting speed, and 0.03 mm/tooth feed are the optimal parameters for the minor surface roughness. In addition, it has been determined that progress is the most influential parameter. On the other hand, ANOVA results showed that the most significant variable on the R-a was feed rate with 42.99%, and then cutting tool type 20.27%, cutting fluid 20.25%, cutting speed 11.68%, and cryogenic heat treatment 1.95%, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. E. Farber, J.-N. Zhu, A. Popovich and V. Popovich, A Review of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy as a Smart Material Produced by Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Today Proc., 2020, 30(3), p 761–767.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.563 ↗
2. S. Bahl, H. Nagar, I. Singh and S. Sehgal, Smart Materials Types, Properties and Applications: A Review, Mater. Today Proc., 2020, 28(3), p 1302–1306.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.505 ↗
3. B. Dash, M. Das, M. Das, T.R. Mahapatra and D. Mishra, A Concise Review on Machinability of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys, Mater. Today Proc., 2019, 18, p 5141–5150.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.511 ↗
4. F. Pusavec, H. Hamdi, J. Kopac and I. Jawahir, Surface Integrity in Cryogenic Machining of Nickel Based Alloy—Inconel 718, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211(4), p 773–783.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.013 ↗
5. M. Bermingham, J. Kirsch, S. Sun, S. Palanisamy and M. Dargusch, New Observations on Tool Life, Cutting Forces and Chip Morphology in Cryogenic Machining Ti-6Al-4V, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2011, 51(6), p 500–511.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.02.009 ↗
6. Y. Zhao, J. Li, K. Guo, V. Sivalingam and J. Sun, Study on chip formation characteristics in turning NiTi shape memory alloys, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 58, p 787–795.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.072 ↗
7. R. Ashima, A. Haleem, S. Bahl, M. Javaid, S.K. Mahla and S. Singh, Automation and Manufacturing of Smart Materials in Additive Manufacturing Technologies Using Internet of Things Towards the Adoption of Industry 4.0, Mater. Today Proc., 2021, 45(6), p 5081–5088.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.583 ↗
8. G. Wang, Z. Liu, J. Niu, W. Huang and Q. Xu, Work Hardening Influencing on Shape Memory Effect of NiTi Alloy by Varying Milling Speeds, Smart Mater. Struct., 2019, 28(10), p 105034.10.1088/1361-665X/ab3de2 ↗
9. C. Velmurugan, V. Senthilkumar, S. Dinesh and D. Arulkirubakaran, Machining of NiTi-Shape Memory Alloys: A Review, Mach. Sci. Technol., 2018, 22(3), p 355–401.10.1080/10910344.2017.1365894 ↗
10. Y. Kaynak, H. Karaca, I.S. Jawahir, Cryogenic Machining of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys, 6th International Conference and Exhibition on Design and Production of MACHINES and DIES/MOLDS, 2011
11. V.N. Kulkarni, V. Gaitonde, V. Hadimani, V. Aiholi, Optimization in Wire Electric Discharge Machining of Nickel-Titanium Shape Memory Alloy, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing., 2019, 577, p 01201510.1088/1757-899X/577/1/012015 ↗
12. K. Weinert, V. Petzoldt and D. Kötter, Turning and Drilling of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys, CIRP Ann., 2004, 53(1), p 65–68.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60646-5 ↗
13. Y. Guo, A. Klink, C. Fu and J. Snyder, Machinability and Surface Integrity of Nitinol Shape Memory Alloy, CIRP Ann., 2013, 62(1), p 83–86.10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.004 ↗
14. H. Huang, A Study of High-Speed Milling Characteristics of Nitinol, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2004, 19(2), p 159–175.10.1081/AMP-120029849 ↗
15. Y.-Z. Zhao, K. Guo, V. Sivalingam, J.-F. Li, Q.-D. Sun, Z.-J. Zhu, J. Sun, Surface Integrity Evolution of Machined NiTi Shape Memory Alloys After Turning Process, Adv. Manufact. 2021, 9(3), p 446–456.10.1007/s40436-020-00330-1 ↗
16. Y. Kaynak, H.E. Karaca and I.S. Jawahir, Cutting Speed Dependent Microstructure and Transformation Behavior of NiTi Alloy in Dry and Cryogenic Machining, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24(1), p 452–460.10.1007/s11665-014-1247-6 ↗
17. Z.A. Zailani and P.T. Mativenga, Effects of Chilled Air on Machinability of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy, Proc. CIRP., 2016, 45(Supplement C), p 207–210.10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.156 ↗
18. Y. Kaynak, H. Tobe, R.D. Noebe, H.E. Karaca and I.S. Jawahir, The Effects of Machining on the Microstructure and Transformation Behavior of NiTi Alloy, Scripta Mater., 2014, 74(Supplement C), p 60–63.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.10.023 ↗
19. K. Aslantaş and Y. Kaynak, Micro Milling of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy and Determination of Critical Chip Thickness, J. Faculty Eng. Architect. Gazi Univ., 2018, 2018(18–2), p 2–16.
20. G. Wang, Z. Liu, X. Ai, W. Huang and J. Niu, Effect of Cutting Parameters on Strain Hardening of Nickel-Titanium Shape Memory Alloy, Smart Mater. Struct., 2018, 27(7), p 075027.10.1088/1361-665X/aac43d ↗
21. R. Kuppuswamy and A. Yui, High-Speed Micromachining Characteristics for the NiTi Shape Memory Alloys, Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol., 2017, 93(1), p 11–21.10.1007/s00170-015-7598-9 ↗
22. K. Weinert and V. Petzoldt, Machining NiTi Micro-Parts by Micro-Milling, Mater. Sci. Eng.A., 2008, 481–482(12), p 672–675.10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.220 ↗
23. Y. Zhao, K. Guo, J. Li and J. Sun, Investigation on Machinability of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys Under Different Cooling Conditions, Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol., 2021, 116(5), p 1913–1923.10.1007/s00170-021-07563-9 ↗
24. A. Kabil, Y. Kaynak, H. Saruhan and O. Benafan, Multi-objective Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Machining Process of Ni-Rich NiTiHf High-Temperature Shape Memory Alloy Using Genetic Algorithm, Shape Memory Superelast., 2021, 7(2), p 270–279.10.1007/s40830-021-00328-z ↗
25. E. Nas, G. Samtaş and H. Demir, Mathematically Modeling Parameters Influencing Surface Roughness in CNC Milling, Pamukkale Univ. J. Eng. Sci., 2012, 18(1), p 47–59.10.5505/pajes.2012.58077 ↗
26. M. Ayyildiz, Modeling for Prediction of Surface Roughness In Milling Medium Density Fiberboard with a Parallel Robot, Sens. Rev., 2019, 39(5), p 716–723.10.1108/SR-02-2019-0051 ↗
27. F. Kura, Optimization of Cutting Parameters in Finishing Milling of Hardox 400 Steel, Int. J. Anal. Exp. Finite Elem. Anal., 2018, 5(3), p 44–49.
28. M.O.J.Z.B. PLASTIKE, Optimization of Surface Roughness in Finish Milling of AISI P20+ S Plastic-Mold Steel, Optimization 2018, 52(2): 195-20010.17222/mit.2017.088 ↗
29. K. Aslantas, E. Ekici and A. Cicek, Optimization of Process Parameters for Micro Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Using Taguchi-Based Gray Relational Analysis, Measurement, 2018, 128, p 419–427.10.1016/j.measurement.2018.06.066 ↗
30. Y. Harun, H. Demir and G. Arif, Optimization of the Cutting Parameters Affecting the Surface Roughness on Free Form Surfaces, Sigma J. Eng. Natl. Sci., 2017, 35(2), p 323–331.
31. E. Altas, H. Gokkaya, M.A. Karatas and D. Ozkan, Analysis of Surface Roughness and Flank Wear Using the Taguchi Method in Milling of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy with Uncoated Tools, Coatings, 2020, 10(12), p 1259.10.3390/coatings10121259 ↗
32. E. Altas, M. Altin-Karatas, H. Gokkaya and Y. Akinay, Surface Integrity of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy in Milling with Cryogenic Heat Treated Cutting Tools under Different Cutting Conditions, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30, p 9426–9439.10.1007/s11665-021-06095-3 ↗
33. B. Kursuncu and A. Yaras, Assessment of the Effect of Borax and Boric Acid Additives in Cutting Fluids on Milling of AISI O2 Using MQL sysTem, Int. J. Adv. Manufac. Technol., 2018, 95(5), p 2005–2013.10.1007/s00170-017-1301-2 ↗
34. K. Kiliçay and M. Ulutan, Investigation of the Solid Lubrication Effect of Commercial Boron-Based Compounds in End Milling, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 2016, 17(4), p 517–524.10.1007/s12541-016-0065-1 ↗
35. M.H. Cetin and S.K. Kilincarslan, Effects of Cutting Fluids with Nano-Silver and Borax Additives on Milling Performance of Aluminium Alloys, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 50, p 170–182.10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.12.042 ↗
36. S. Akincioğlu, H. Gökkaya and İ Uygur, A Review of Cryogenic Treatment on Cutting Tools, Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol., 2015, 78(9–12), p 1609–1627.10.1007/s00170-014-6755-x ↗
37. A. Saini, B. Pabla and S. Dhami, Improvement in PERFORMANCE of Cryogenically Treated Tungsten Carbide Tools in Face Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2020, 35(5), p 598–607.10.1080/10426914.2019.1615079 ↗
38. H. Caliskan, P. Panjan, C. Kurbanoglu, Hard coatings on cutting tools and surface finish, 201710.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09178-5 ↗
39. W.F. Sales, J. Schoop, L.R. da Silva, Á.R. Machado and I. Jawahir, A Review of Surface Integrity in Machining of Hardened Steels, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 58, p 136–162.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.040 ↗
40. M.A. Makhesana and K.M. Patel, Performance of PVD and CVD Coated Cutting Tool Inserts in Machining Under MQL-MQSL Environment, Int. J. Mechatron. Manufact. Syst., 2020, 13(3), p 210–229.
41. F.J.G. Silva, R.P. Martinho, C. Martins, H. Lopes and R.M. Gouveia, Machining GX2CrNiMoN26-7-4 DSS Alloy Wear Analysis of TiAlN and TiCN/Al2O3/TiN Coated Carbide Tools Behavior in Rough End Milling Operations, Coatings, 2019, 9(6), p 392.10.3390/coatings9060392 ↗
42. A. Palanisamy, T. Selvaraj and S. Sivasankaran, Optimization of Turning Parameters of Machining Incoloy 800H Superalloy Using Cryogenically Treated Multilayer CVD-Coated Tool, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2018, 43(9), p 4977–4990.10.1007/s13369-018-3287-y ↗
43. H. Gökkaya, The Effects of Machining Parameters on Cutting Forces, Surface Roughness, Built-Up Edge (BUE) and Built-Up Layer (BUL) During Machining AA2014 (T4) Alloy, Strojniski Vestnik J. Mech. Eng. 2010, 56(9), p 584–593.
44. Y. Kaynak, B. Huang, H.E. Karaca and I.S. Jawahir, Surface Characteristics of Machined NiTi Shape Memory Alloy: The Effects of Cryogenic Cooling and Preheating Conditions, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26(7), p 3597–3606.10.1007/s11665-017-2791-7 ↗
45. Y. Kaynak, H.E. Karaca, R.D. Noebe and I.S. Jawahir, Tool-Wear Analysis in Cryogenic Machining of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys: A Comparison of Tool-Wear Performance with Dry and MQL Machining, Wear, 2013, 306(1), p 51–63.10.1016/j.wear.2013.05.011 ↗
46. E. Kaya, İ. Kaya, Tool Wear Progression of PCD and PCBN Cutting Tools in High Speed Machining of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy Under Various Cutting Speeds, Diamond Related Mater. 2020, p 1-1010.1016/j.diamond.2020.107810 ↗
47. V. Nguyen, T. Nguyen and D. Tien, Cutting Parameter Optimization in Finishing Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy Under MQL Condition Using TOPSIS and ANOVA Analysis, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., 2021, 11(1), p 6775–6780.10.48084/etasr.4015 ↗
48. E. Hazir and T. Ozcan, Response Surface Methodology Integrated with Desirability Function and Genetic Algorithm Approach for the Optimization of CNC Machining Parameters, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2019, 44(3), p 2795–2809.10.1007/s13369-018-3559-6 ↗
49. E. Hazir, E.S. Erdinler and K.H. Koc, Optimization of CNC Cutting Parameters Using Design of Experiment (DOE) and Desirability Function, J. For. Res., 2018, 29(5), p 1423–1434.10.1007/s11676-017-0555-8 ↗
50. M. Bahrami, M.J. Amiri, M.R. Mahmoudi and S. Koochaki, Modeling Caffeine Adsorption by Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Using Multiple Polynomial Regression with Interaction Effects, J. Water Health, 2017, 15(4), p 526–535.10.2166/wh.2017.297 ↗
51. G. Mansour, P. Kyratsis, A. Korlos and D. Tzetzis, Investigation into the Effect of Cutting Conditions in Turning on the Surface Properties of Filament Winding GFRP Pipe Rings, Machines., 2021, 9(1), p 16.10.3390/machines9010016 ↗