Rheology, Crystallinity, and Mechanical Investigation of Interlayer Adhesion Strength by Thermal Annealing of Polyetherimide (PEI/ULTEM 1010) Parts Produced by 3D Printing
Source abstract
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a 3D printing technology in which the melt extrusion method is used for the production of thermoplastic parts. 3D printed thermoplastic materials produced by this method suffer from a particularly significant problem, however, namely poor interfacial bond formation that results in weak mechanical performance. This work proposes a thermal process to enhance the strength of the interlayer adhesion of 3D printed PEI thermoplastic materials. The annealing process was determined as a suitable post-processing procedure and was the focus of this work. Annealing was carried out in an oven at temperatures of 220, 225, 230, and 235 degrees C; it was determined that annealing performed at 225 degrees C in particular was highly desirable in terms of enhancing interlayer adhesion strength. In this work, characterization (FTIR, XRD, and SEM) and mechanical (tensile, bending, and hardness) analyses of 3D printed PEI were performed to better understand the strength of interlayer adhesion and overcome a mechanical performance limitation of this material. According to the tensile, bending, and hardness test results, the greatest improvements were found as increase of 10, 5, and 12%, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. R. Singh and J.P. Davim, Additive Manufacturing: Applications and Innovations. (CRC Press, 2018.)10.1201/b22179 ↗
2. T. Pereira, J.V. Kennedy and J. Potgieter, A Comparison of Traditional Manufacturing vs Additive Manufacturing, the Best Method for the Job, Procedia Manuf., 2019, 30, p 11–18.10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003 ↗
3. J.P. Davim, “Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing: Emergent Technologies. (Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Co KG, 2020)10.1515/9783110549775 ↗
4. K.S. Prakash, T. Nancharaih and V.V.S. Rao, Additive Manufacturing Techniques in Manufacturing-an Overview, Mater. Today Proc., 2018, 5(2), p 3873–3882.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.642 ↗
5. J. Pou, A. Riveiro, and P. Davim, “Additive Manufacturing,” Elsevier, 2021
6. O. Abdulhameed, A. Al-Ahmari, W. Ameen and S.H. Mian, Additive Manufacturing: Challenges, Trends, and Applications, Adv. Mech. Eng., 2019, 11(2), p 1687814018822880.10.1177/1687814018822880 ↗
7. J. Jiang, A Novel Fabrication Strategy for Additive Manufacturing Processes, J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 272, p 122916.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122916 ↗
8. K. Das, P. Tandon and A. Singh, 3D Printing–Imaging the Future Layer by Layer, J. Contemp. Orthod., 2020, 4(3), p 44–48.
9. J.Y. Wong and A.C. Pfahnl, 3D Printing of Surgical Instruments for Long-Duration Space Missions, Aviat. Space. Environ. Med., 2014, 85(7), p 758–763.10.3357/ASEM.3898.2014 ↗
10. P. Bere, C. Neamtu and R. Udroiu, Novel Method for the Manufacture of Complex CFRP Parts Using FDM-Based Molds, Polymers (Basel)., 2020, 12(10), p 2220.10.3390/polym12102220 ↗
11. L. Novakova-Marcincinova, J. Novak-Marcincin, J. Barna, and J. Torok, “Special Materials Used in FDM Rapid Prototyping Technology Application,” 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), IEEE, 2012, p 73–76.10.1109/INES.2012.6249805 ↗
12. X. Han, D. Yang, C. Yang, S. Spintzyk, L. Scheideler, P. Li, D. Li, J. Geis-Gerstorfer and F. Rupp, Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications, J. Clin. Med., 2019, 8(2), p 240.10.3390/jcm8020240 ↗
13. R. Sharma, R. Singh, R. Penna and F. Fraternali, Investigations for Mechanical Properties of Hap, PVC and PP Based 3D Porous Structures Obtained through Biocompatible FDM Filaments, Compos. Part B Eng., 2018, 132, p 237–243.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.021 ↗
14. Y. Zhao, K. Zhao, Y. Li and F. Chen, Mechanical Characterization of Biocompatible PEEK by FDM, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 56, p 28–42.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.063 ↗
15. N.E. Zander, Recycled Polymer Feedstocks for Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing, Polymer-Based Additive Manufacturing: Recent Developments. J.E. Seppala, A.P. Kotula, C.R. Snyder Ed., American Chemical Society, Washington, 2019, p 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1315.ch00310.1021/bk-2019-1315.ch003 ↗
16. K.G. Mostafa, C. Montemagno and A.J. Qureshi, Strength to Cost Ratio Analysis of FDM Nylon 12 3D Printed Parts, Procedia Manuf., 2018, 26, p 753–762.10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.086 ↗
17. H. Wu, M. Sulkis, J. Driver, A. Saade-Castillo, A. Thompson and J.H. Koo, Multi-Functional ULTEMTM 1010 Composite Filaments for Additive Manufacturing Using Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), Addit. Manuf., 2018, 24, p 298–306.
18. A. Slonov, I. Musov, A. Zhansitov, E. Rzhevskaya, D. Khakulova and S. Khashirova, The Effect of Modification on the Properties of Polyetherimide and Its Carbon-Filled Composite, Polymers (Basel)., 2020, 12(5), p 1056.10.3390/polym12051056 ↗
19. G. Taylor, X. Wang, L. Mason, M.C. Leu, K. Chandrashekhara, T. Schniepp, and R. Jones, (2018). Flexural Behavior of Additively Manufactured Ultem 1010: Experiment and Simulation. Rapid Prototyp. J.10.1108/RPJ-02-2018-0037 ↗
20. M. Fischer and V. Schöppner, Fatigue Behavior of FDM Parts Manufactured with Ultem 9085, Jom, 2017, 69(3), p 563–568.10.1007/s11837-016-2197-2 ↗
21. G. Taylor, S. Anandan, D. Murphy, M. Leu and K. Chandrashekhara, Fracture Toughness of Additively Manufactured ULTEM 1010, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2019, 14(3), p 277–283.10.1080/17452759.2018.1558494 ↗
22. U.K. Komal, B.K. Kasaudhan and I. Singh, Comparative Performance Analysis of Polylactic Acid Parts Fabricated by 3D Printing and Injection Molding, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021, 30(9), p 6522–6528.10.1007/s11665-021-05889-9 ↗
23. O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood and J.L. Bhowmik, Experimental Investigation of Time-Dependent Mechanical Properties of PC-ABS Prototypes Processed by FDM Additive Manufacturing Process, Mater. Lett., 2017, 193, p 58–62.10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.104 ↗
24. M. Manjaiah, K. Raghavendra, N. Balashanmugam, and J.P. Davim, “Additive Manufacturing: A Tool for Industrial Revolution 4.0,” Elsevier, 2021
25. S.R. Rajpurohit and H.K. Dave, (2018) Effect of Process Parameters on Tensile Strength of FDM Printed PLA Part. Rapid Prototyp. J. Emerald Publishing Limited.10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134 ↗
26. R. Kotsilkova, I. Petrova-Doycheva, D. Menseidov, E. Ivanov, A. Paddubskaya and P. Kuzhir, Exploring Thermal Annealing and Graphene-Carbon Nanotube Additives to Enhance Crystallinity, Thermal, Electrical and Tensile Properties of Aged Poly (Lactic) Acid-Based Filament for 3D Printing, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2019, 181, p 107712.10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107712 ↗
27. D. Jiang and D.E. Smith, Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Oriented Carbon Fiber Filled Polymer Composites Produced with Fused Filament Fabrication, Addit. Manuf., 2017, 18, p 84–94.
28. B. Akhoundi, M. Nabipour, F. Hajami and D. Shakoori, An Experimental Study of Nozzle Temperature and Heat Treatment (Annealing) Effects on Mechanical Properties of High-Temperature Polylactic Acid in Fused Deposition Modeling, Polym. Eng. Sci., 2020, 60(5), p 979–987.10.1002/pen.25353 ↗
29. J. Butt and R. Bhaskar, Investigating the Effects of Annealing on the Mechanical Properties of FFF-Printed Thermoplastics, J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2020, 4(2), p 38.
30. C. Benwood, A. Anstey, J. Andrzejewski, M. Misra and A.K. Mohanty, Improving the Impact Strength and Heat Resistance of 3D Printed Models: Structure, Property, and Processing Correlationships during Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Poly (Lactic Acid), Acs Omega, 2018, 3(4), p 4400–4411.10.1021/acsomega.8b00129 ↗
31. Y. Song, Y. Li, W. Song, K. Yee, K.-Y. Lee and V.L. Tagarielli, Measurements of the Mechanical Response of Unidirectional 3D-Printed PLA, Mater. Des., 2017, 123, p 154–164.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 ↗
32. D.C. Bassett, R.H. Olley and I. Al Raheil, On Crystallization Phenomena in PEEK, Polymer (Guildf)., 1988, 29(10), p 1745–1754.10.1016/0032-3861(88)90386-2 ↗
33. M. Sharma, V. Sharma, and P. Kala, “Optimization of Process Variables to Improve the Mechanical Properties of FDM Structures,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2019, p 1206110.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012061 ↗
34. P. Han, A. Tofangchi, A. Deshpande, S. Zhang and K. Hsu, An Approach to Improve Interface Healing in FFF-3D Printed Ultem 1010 Using Laser Pre-Deposition Heating, Procedia Manuf., 2019, 34, p 672–677.10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.195 ↗
35. S. Singh, M. Singh, C. Prakash, M.K. Gupta, M. Mia and R. Singh, Optimization and Reliability Analysis to Improve Surface Quality and Mechanical Characteristics of Heat-Treated Fused Filament Fabricated Parts, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 102(5–8), p 1521–1536.10.1007/s00170-018-03276-8 ↗
36. S. Bhandari, R.A. Lopez-Anido and D.J. Gardner, Enhancing the Interlayer Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced PETG and PLA Composites via Annealing, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 30, p 100922.
37. I.M. Balashova, R.P. Danner, P.S. Puri and J.L. Duda, Solubility and Diffusivity of Solvents and Nonsolvents in Polysulfone and Polyetherimide, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2001, 40(14), p 3058–3064.10.1021/ie001074m ↗
38. Stratasys, “ULTEM 1010 Resin ULTEM 1010 Resin,” n.d., p 1–3, https://arti90.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Spec-Sheet-ULTEM-1010-EN-A4-1.pdf.
39. P.G. de Gennes, Reptation of a Polymer Chain in the Presence of Fixed Obstacles, The J. Chem. Phys., 1971, 55(2), p 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.167578910.1063/1.1675789 ↗
40. Y.H. Kim and R.P. Wool, A Theory of Healing at a Polymer-Polymer Interface, Macromolecules, 1983, 16(7), p 1115–1120.10.1021/ma00241a013 ↗
41. Q. Sun, G.M. Rizvi, C.T. Bellehumeur and P. Gu, Effect of Processing Conditions on the Bonding Quality of FDM Polymer Filaments, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2008, 14(2), p 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254081086202810.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
42. S. Prager and M. Tirrell, The Healing Process at Polymer-Polymer Interfaces, J. Chem. Phys., 1981, 75(10), p 5194–5198.10.1063/1.441871 ↗
43. T. Ge, M.O. Robbins, D. Perahia and G.S. Grest, Healing of Polymer Interfaces: Interfacial Dynamics, Entanglements, and Strength, Phys. Rev. E, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.01260210.1103/PhysRevE.90.012602 ↗
44. A. D638-14, ASTM International, Stand. test method tensile Prop. Plast., 2014
45. A. International, ASTM D790−17-Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials, 2017
46. A. Standard, D2240‐15 Standard Test Method for Rubber Property–Durometer Hardness, 2015.
47. B.-K. Chen, C.-T. Su, M.-C. Tseng and S.-Y. Tsay, Preparation of Polyetherimide Nanocomposites with Improved Thermal Mechanical and Dielectric Properties, Polym. Bull., 2006, 57(5), p 671–681.10.1007/s00289-006-0630-3 ↗
48. A. Choudhury, Dielectric and Piezoelectric Properties of Polyetherimide/BaTiO3 Nanocomposites, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2010, 121(1–2), p 280–285.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.01.035 ↗
49. R.N. Muthu, S. Rajashabala, and R. Kannan, Synthesis of Polyetherimide/Halloysite Nanotubes (PEI/HNTs) Based Nanocomposite Membrane towards Hydrogen Storage, AIP Conference Proceedings, (AIP Publishing LLC, 2018) p 50107.10.1063/1.5028738 ↗
50. M. Owlad, M.K. Aroua and W.M.A.W. Daud, Hexavalent Chromium Adsorption on Impregnated Palm Shell Activated Carbon with Polyethyleneimine, Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101(14), p 5098–5103.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.135 ↗
51. A. D5573-99, (2012) Standard Practice for Classifying Failure Modes in Fiber-Reinforced-Plastic (FRP) Joints. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. p 2002.
52. N. Wang and S. Xia, Cohesive Fracture of Elastically Heterogeneous Materials: An Integrative Modeling and Experimental Study, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 2017, 98, p 87–105.10.1016/j.jmps.2016.09.004 ↗
53. A.M. Harris and E.C. Lee, Improving Mechanical Performance of Injection Molded PLA by Controlling Crystallinity, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2008, 107(4), p 2246–2255.10.1002/app.27261 ↗
54. M. Zhu, J. Han, F. Wang, W. Shao, R. Xiong, Q. Zhang, H. Pan, Y. Yang, S.K. Samal and F. Zhang, Electrospun Nanofibers Membranes for Effective Air Filtration, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2017, 302(1), p 1600353.10.1002/mame.201600353 ↗
55. M. Hesami and A. Jalali-Arani, Cold Crystallization Behavior of Poly (Lactic Acid) in Its Blend with Acrylic Rubber; the Effect of Acrylic Rubber Content, Polym. Int., 2017, 66(11), p 1564–1571.10.1002/pi.5414 ↗
56. C. Yang, X. Tian, D. Li, Y. Cao, F. Zhao and C. Shi, Influence of Thermal Processing Conditions in 3D Printing on the Crystallinity and Mechanical Properties of PEEK Material, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, 248, p 1–7.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 ↗
57. B.S. Thakkar and L.J. Broutman, Impact Strength of Polymers. 3: The Effect of Annealing on Cold Worked Polycarbonates, Polym. Eng. Sci., 1981, 21(3), p 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76021030810.1002/pen.760210308 ↗
58. J. Cao, M.A. Gharghouri, and P. Nash, Finite-Element Analysis and Experimental Validation of Thermal Residual Stress and Distortion in Electron Beam Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Build Plates, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Elsevier, 2016, 237, p 409–419.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.032 ↗
59. A.A. D’Amico, A. Debaie, and A.M. Peterson, (2017) Effect of Layer Thickness on Irreversible Thermal Expansion and Interlayer Strength in Fused Deposition Modeling, Rapid Prototyp. J. Emerald Publishing Limited.10.1108/RPJ-05-2016-0077 ↗
60. A. Štibler, K. Herrmann, and Z. Šušteri, “Long-Term Stability of Rubber Hardness Reference Blocks,” HARDMEKO, 2004
61. G. Liao, Z. Li, C. Luan, Z. Wang, X. Yao and J. Fu, Additive Manufacturing of Polyamide 66: Effect of Process Parameters on Crystallinity and Mechanical Properties, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2022, 31(1), p 191–200.10.1007/s11665-021-06149-6 ↗
62. W. Wu, J. Jiang, H. Jiang, W. Liu, G. Li, B. Wang, M. Tang and J. Zhao, Improving Bending and Dynamic Mechanics Performance of 3D Printing through Ultrasonic Strengthening, Mater. Lett., 2018, 220, p 317–320.10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.048 ↗
63. S. Rangisetty and L.D. Peel, “The Effect of Infill Patterns and Annealing on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Thermoplastic Composites,” Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017) p V001T08A017.10.1115/SMASIS2017-4011 ↗
64. L. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Wang and T.A. Osswald, Laser Polishing of Cu/PLA Composite Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling: Analysis of Surface Finish and Mechanical Properties, Polym. Compos., 2020, 41(4), p 1356–1368.10.1002/pc.25459 ↗
65. R.A. Wach, P. Wolszczak and A. Adamus-Wlodarczyk, Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of FDM-PLA Parts via Thermal Annealing, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2018, 303(9), p 1800169.10.1002/mame.201800169 ↗
66. N. Sabyrov, A. Abilgaziyev and M. Ali, Enhancing Interlayer Bonding Strength of FDM 3D Printing Technology by Diode Laser-Assisted System, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 108(1), p 603–611.10.1007/s00170-020-05455-y ↗
67. A.C. de Bruijn, G. Gómez-Gras and M.A. Pérez, Thermal Annealing as a Post-Process for Additively Manufactured Ultem 9085 Parts, Procedia Comput. Sci., 2022, 200, p 1308–1317.10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.332 ↗