journal article·2014-03Open access

Microhardness and Surface Integrity in Turning Process of Duplex Stainless Steel (DSS) for Different Cutting Conditions

G. Krolczyk, P. Nieslony, S. Legutko

Abstract

Duplex stainless steels (DSSs) are considered to be difficult to machine. Built-up-edge (BUE) and irregular wear are common challenges in machining operations (Ref 1 ). This degrades the surface finish of a machined product and results in reduced tool life. To utilize the useful properties of two-phase microstructure is necessary to study surface quality of machined stainless steels. According to Jang et al. (Ref 2 ), surface integrity (SI) is a measure of the quality of a machined surface and is interpreted as elements which describe the actual structure of both surface and subsurface. SI is generally defined by its mechanical, metallurgical, chemical, and topological states of surface properties. To ensure better SI, special attention must be paid when choosing cutting parameters (Ref 3 , 4 ), tool material and geometry (Ref 5 , 6 ), and tool coatings (Ref 7 , 8 ). SI is important for the components’ ability to adapt to high thermal and mechanical loads during their applications (Ref 9 , 10 ). SI and surface microhardness are important in determining corrosion resistance, and also in fatigue crack initiation. The DSS is widely used for many industrial applications due to its unique properties. These are more important in the machining of expensive machine parts. Cabrera et al. (Ref 11 ) and Park et al. (Ref 12 ) considered that the good combination of their mechanical properties (high strength and toughness) and corrosion resistance makes them of great interest for a wide range of applications, especially in the oil, chemical, and power industries. Therefore it is very important to control their microstructure evolution, physical, and mechanical properties. According to Solomon and Solomon (Ref 13 ) in the case of materials with austenitic structure, plastic deformation can induce transformation of austenite structure into martensite structure. According to Kundrak et al. (Ref 14 ), turning performed at high speed is an intensive technology in terms of the heat generated in the process. The temperature of the workpiece material in the cutting edge area may reach the transformation temperature. Sasahara (Ref 15 ) demonstrated, using 0.45% C steel test material, that for tool corner radius of 0.2 and 0.8 mm, the hardness on the machined surface becomes higher with a smaller radius. In addition, the feed rate did not affect the surface hardness for values between 0.05 and 0.4 mm/rev. Ezugwu et al. (Ref 16 ) demonstrated that the cutting tool geometry in machining nickel-based alloys represents an important parameter in tool life and in the quality of the machined surface. Ezugwu and Tang (Ref 17 ) have found that a machined surface obtained with the rhomboid shaped insert has a higher microhardness as compared to the round inserts. Javidi et al. (Ref 18 ) showed that plastic deformation of the grain boundaries was found in the first 3-4 μm of the subsurface layer. They also confirmed that no significant variation in hardness was observed beneath the machined surface obtained by different cutting conditions. Ozturk and Altan (Ref 19 ) presented the effects of cutting edge radius on the cutting and thrust forces. They showed that cutting forces increase with increasing edge radius for CuZn30 workpiece material. Storch and Zawada-Tomkiewicz (Ref 20 ) showed distribution of unit forces on the tool nose rounding in turning process for C55 steel. But these publications did not mention problems related to the microhardness as physical parameters of SI.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Paro, H. Hanninen, and V. Kauppinen, Tool Wear and Machinability of X5 CrMnN 18 18 Stainless Steels, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2001, 119, p p14–p2010.1016/S0924-0136(01)00877-9 ↗
2. D.Y. Jang, T.R. Watkins, K.J. Kozaczek, C.R. Hubbard, and O.B. Cavin, Surface Residual Stresses in Machined Austenitic Stainless Steel, Wear, 1996, 194, p 168–17310.1016/0043-1648(95)06838-4 ↗
3. G. Krolczyk, M. Gajek, and S. Legutko, Predicting the Tool Life in the Dry Machining of Duplex Stainless Steel, Eksploat. Niezawodn., 2013, 15(1), p 62–65
4. G. Krolczyk, M. Gajek, and S. Legutko, Effect of the Cutting Parameters Impact on Tool Life in Duplex Stainless Steel Turning Process, Tehnički Vjesnik - Technical Gazette, 2013, 20(4), p 587–592
5. G. Krolczyk, S. Legutko, and P. Raos, Cutting Wedge Wear Examination During Turning of Duplex Stainless Steel, Tehnički Vjesnik - Technical Gazette, 2013, 20(3), p 413–418
6. G. Krolczyk, S. Legutko, and M. Gajek, Predicting the Surface Roughness in the Dry Machining of Duplex Stainless Steel, Metalurgija, 2013, 52(2), p 259–262
7. C.F. Yao, Q.C. Jin, X.C. Huang, D.X. Wu, J.X. Ren, and D.H. Zhang, Research on Surface Integrity of Grinding Inconel 718, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2013, 65, p 1019–103010.1007/s00170-012-4236-7 ↗
8. W. Grzesik and J. Malecka, Documentation of Tool Wear Progress in the Machining of Nodular Ductile Iron with Silicon Nitride-Based Ceramic Tools, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 2011, 60(1), p 121–12410.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.083 ↗
9. D.A. Axinte and R.C. Dewes, Surface Integrity of Hot Work Tool Steel After High Speed Milling Experimental Data and Empirical Models, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2002, 127, p 325–33510.1016/S0924-0136(02)00282-0 ↗
10. W. Grzesik, M. Bartoszuk, and P. Nieslony, Finite Difference Method-Based Simulation of Temperature Fields for Application to Orthogonal Cutting with Coated Tools, Mach. Sci. Technol., 2005, 9(4), p 529–54610.1080/10910340500398258 ↗
11. J.M. Cabrera, A. Mateo, L. Llanes, J.M. Prado, and M. Anglada, Hot Deformation of Duplex Stainless Steels, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2003, 143-144, p 321–32510.1016/S0924-0136(03)00434-5 ↗
12. Y.H. Park and Z.H. Lee, The Effect of Nitrogen and Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of 25Cr-7Ni-1.5Mo-3 W-xN Duplex Stainless Steel Castings, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2001, 297, p 78–8410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01263-6 ↗
13. N. Solomon and I. Solomon, Deformation Induced Martensite in AISI, 316 Stainless Steel, Rev. Metall., 2010, 46(2), p 121–12810.3989/revmetalm.0920 ↗
14. J.A. Kundrak, G. Mamalis, K. Gyani, and V. Bana, Surface Layer Microhardness Changes with High-Speed Turning of Hardened Steels, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2011, 53, p 105–11210.1007/s00170-010-2840-y ↗
15. H. Sasahara, The Effect on Fatigue Life of Residual Stress and Surface Hardness Resulting from Different Cutting Conditions of 0.45%C Steel, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2005, 45(2), p 131–13610.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.002 ↗
16. E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang, and A.R. Machado, The Machinability of Nickel-Based Alloys: A Review, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999, 86, p 1–1610.1016/S0924-0136(98)00314-8 ↗
17. E.O. Ezugwu and S.H. Tang, Surface Abuse When Machining Cast Iron (G-17) and Nickel-Base Superalloy (Inconel 718) with Ceramic Tools, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1995, 55, p 63–6910.1016/0924-0136(95)01786-0 ↗
18. A. Javidi, U. Rieger, and W. Eichlseder, The Effect of Machining on the Surface Integrity and Fatigue Life, Int. J. Fatigue, 2008, 30(10-11), p 2050–205510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.005 ↗
19. S. Ozturk and E. Altan, A Slip-Line Approach to the Machining with Rounded-Edge Tool, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 63, p 513–52210.1007/s00170-012-3941-6 ↗
20. B. Storch and A. Zawada-Tomkiewicz, Distribution of Unit Forces on the Tool Edge Rounding in the Case of Finishing Turning, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 60, p 453–46110.1007/s00170-011-3617-7 ↗