Prediction of the Functional Performance of Machined Components Based on Surface Topography: State of the Art
Source abstract
Abstract
This survey overviews the functional performance of manufactured components produced by typical finishing machining operations in terms of their topographical characteristics. Surface topographies were characterized using both profile (2D) and 3D (areal) surface roughness parameters. The prediction of typical functional properties such as fatigue, friction, wear, bonding and corrosion is discussed based on appropriate surface roughness parameters. Some examples of real 3D surface topographies produced with desired functional characteristics are provided. This survey highlights technological possibilities of producing surfaces with enhanced functional properties by machining processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. T.G. Mathia, P. Pawlus, and M. Wieczorowski, Recent Trends in Surface Metrology, Wear, 2011, 271(3-4), p 494–50810.1016/j.wear.2010.06.001 ↗
2. X.J. Jiang and D.V. Whitehouse, Technological Shifts in Surface Metrology, CIRP Manuf. Technol., 2012, 61(2), p 815–83610.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.009 ↗
3. B. Griffiths, Manufacturing Surface Technology, Penton Press, London, 2001
4. T. Burakowski, Areology. Theoretical Fundamentals, Institute of Exploitation Technology, Radom, 2013 (in Polish)
5. D.J. Whitehouse, Function Maps and the Role of Surfaces, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2001, 41(13-14), p 1847–186110.1016/S0890-6955(01)00049-9 ↗
6. R. Leach, Ed., Characterization of Areal Surface Texture, Springer, Berlin, 2013
7. K.J. Stout and L. Blunt, Three Dimensional Surface Topography, Penton Press, London, 2000
8. D. Novocic, R.C. Dewes, D.K. Aspinwall, W. Voice, and P. Bowen, The Effect of Machined Topography and Integrity on Fatigue Life, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2004, 44(2-3), p 125–13410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.10.018 ↗
9. K.J. Kubiak, T.W. Liskiewicz, and T.G. Mathia, Surface Morphology in Engineering Applications: Influence of Roughness on Sliding and Wear in Dry Fretting, Tribol. Int., 2011, 44(11), p 1427–143210.1016/j.triboint.2011.04.020 ↗
10. R. Sing, S.N. Melkote, and F. Hashimoto, Frictional Response of Precision Finished Surfaces in Pure Sliding, Wear, 2005, 258(10), p 1500–150910.1016/j.wear.2004.03.071 ↗
11. F. Hashimoto, S.N. Melkote, R. Singh, R. Kalil, Effect of Finishing Methods on Surface Characteristics and Performance of Precision Components in Rolling/Sliding Contact, in Proceedings of 10th International Workshop on Modeling of Machining Operations, Sintra, 2010, p. 21.
12. N. Tayebi and A.A. Polycarpou, Modeling the Effect of Skewness and Kurtosis on the Static Coefficient of Rough Surfaces, Tribol. Int., 2004, 37(6), p 491–50510.1016/j.triboint.2003.11.010 ↗
13. M. Sedlacek, B. Podgornik, and J. Vizitin, Influence of Surface Preparation on Roughness Parameters, Friction and Wear, Wear, 2009, 266(3-4), p 482–48710.1016/j.wear.2008.04.017 ↗
14. A.A.G. Bruzzone, H.L. Costa, P.M. Lonardo, and D.A. Lucca, Advances in Engineered Surfaces for Functional Performance, CIRP Manuf. Technol., 2008, 57(2), p 750–76910.1016/j.cirp.2008.09.003 ↗
15. I.S. Jawahir, E. Brinksmeier, R. M’Saoubi et al., Surface Integrity in Removal Processes: Recent adVances, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 60(2), p 603–62610.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002 ↗
16. W. Grzesik, Chapter 20-Surface Integrity, in Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2008), pp. 405–42610.1016/B978-008044534-2.50039-4 ↗
17. W. Grzesik and K. Zak, Producing High Quality Hardened Parts Using Sequential Hard Turning and Ball Burnishing Operations, Precis. Eng., 2013, 37, p 849–85510.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.05.001 ↗
18. W. Grzesik, J. Rech, and K. Zak, Characterization of Surface Textures Generated on Hardened Steel Parts in High-Precision Machining Operations, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 78, p 2049–205610.1007/s00170-015-6800-4 ↗
19. W. Grzesik and K. Zak, Characterization of Surface Integrity Produced by Sequential Dry Hard Turning and Ball Burnishing Operations, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2014, 136, p 031017-1–031017-910.1115/1.4026936 ↗
20. W. Grzesik, J. Rech, and T. Wanat, Surface Finish on Hardened Bearing Steel Parts Produced by Superhard and Abrasive Tools, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2007, 47, p 255–26210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.018 ↗
21. G. Stachowiak and P. Podsiadlo, 3-D Characterization, Optimization, and Classification of Textured Surfaces, Tribol. Lett., 2008, 32(1), p 13–2110.1007/s11249-008-9354-x ↗
22. M. Zecchino, Characterizing Surface Quality: Why Average Roughness is Not Enough (2003). www.veeco.com
23. K.L. Lyon, T.J. Marrow, and S.B. Lyon, Influence of Milling on the Development of Stress Corrosion Cracks in Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 218, p 32–3710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.038 ↗