Increasing the Productivity of Laser Powder Bed Fusion for Stainless Steel 316L through Increased Layer Thickness
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) is able to generate parts of a quality comparable to those produced through conventional manufacturing, but most of the AM processes are associated with low build speeds, which reduce the overall productivity. This paper evaluates how increasing the powder layer thickness from 20 µm to 80 µm affects the build speed, microstructure and mechanical properties of stainless steel 316L parts that are produced using laser powder bed fusion. A detailed microstructure characterization was performed using scanning electron microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, and x-ray powder diffraction in conjunction with tensile testing. The results suggest that parts can be fabricated four times faster with tensile strengths comparable to those obtained using standard process parameters. In either case, nominal relative density of > 99.9% is obtained but with the 80 µm layer thickness presenting some lack of fusion defects, which resulted in a reduced elongation to fracture. Still, acceptable yield strength and ultimate tensile strength values of 464 MPa and 605 MPa were obtained, and the average elongation to fracture was 44%, indicating that desirable properties can be achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. W.E. Frazier, Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23(6), p 1917–192810.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
2. Y.M. Wang, T. Voisin, J.T. McKeown, J. Ye, N.P. Calta, Z. Li, Z. Zeng, Y. Zhang, W. Chen, T.T. Roehling, R.T. Ott, M.K. Santala, P.J.J.J. Depond, M.J. Matthews, A.V. Hamza, and T. Zhu, Additively Manufactured Hierarchical Stainless Steels with High Strength and Ductility, Nat. Mater., 2018, 17(1), p 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT502110.1038/NMAT5021 ↗
3. M. Attaran, The Rise of 3-D Printing: The Advantages of Additive Manufacturing over Traditional Manufacturing, Bus. Horiz., 2017, 60(5), p 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.01110.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
4. M. Baumers, P. Dickens, C. Tuck, and R. Hague, The Cost of Additive Manufacturing: Machine Productivity, Economies of Scale and Technology-Push, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2016, 102, p 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.01510.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015 ↗
5. C.R. Cunningham, S. Wikshåland, F. Xu, N. Kemakolam, A. Shokrani, V. Dhokia, and S.T. Newman, Cost Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis of Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing, Procedia Manuf., 2017, 11(December), p 650–65710.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.163 ↗
6. S. Greco, K. Gutzeit, H. Hotz, B. Kirsch, and J.C. Aurich, Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of AISI, 316L—Impact of Laser Power, Layer Thickness, and Hatch Spacing on Roughness, Density, and Microhardness at Constant Input Energy Density, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2020, 108(5–6), p 1551–156210.1007/s00170-020-05510-8 ↗
7. L. Liu, Q. Ding, Y. Zhong, J. Zou, J. Wu, Y.L. Chiu, J. Li, Z. Zhang, Q. Yu, and Z. Shen, Dislocation Network in Additive Manufactured Steel Breaks Strength-Ductility Trade-Off, Mater. Today, 2018, 21(4), p 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.00410.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.004 ↗
8. Z. Sun, X. Tan, S.B. Tor, and C.K. Chua, Simultaneously Enhanced Strength and Ductility for 3D-Printed Stainless Steel 316L by Selective Laser Melting, NPG Asia Mater., 2018, 10(4), p 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-018-0018-510.1038/s41427-018-0018-5 ↗
9. A. Leicht, M. Rashidi, U. Klement, and E. Hryha, Effect of Process Parameters on the Microstructure, Tensile Strength and Productivity of 316L Parts Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Charact, Mater, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.11001610.1016/j.matchar.2019.110016 ↗
10. E. Liverani, S. Toschi, L. Ceschini, and A. Fortunato, Effect of Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Process Parameters on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, 249, p 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.04210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.042 ↗
11. S. Tsopanos, R.A.W. Mines, S. McKown, Y. Shen, W.J. Cantwell, W. Brooks, and C.J. Sutcliffe, The Influence of Processing Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Selectively Laser Melted Stainless Steel Microlattice Structures, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2010, 132(4), p 041011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400174310.1115/1.4001743 ↗
12. S.S. Babu, L. Love, R. Dehoff, W. Peter, T.R. Watkins, and S. Pannala, Additive Manufacturing of Materials: Opportunities and Challenges, MRS Bull., 2015, 40(12), p 1154–116110.1557/mrs.2015.234 ↗
13. Z. Sun, X. Tan, S.B. Tor, and W.Y. Yeong, Selective Laser Melting of Stainless Steel 316L with Low Porosity and High Build Rates, Mater. Des., 2016, 104, p 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.03510.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.035 ↗
14. S. Wang, Y. Liu, W. Shi, B. Qi, J. Yang, F. Zhang, D. Han, and Y. Ma, Research on High Layer Thickness Fabricated of 316L by Selective Laser Melting, Materials., 2017, 10(9), p 105510.3390/ma10091055 ↗
15. X. Shi, S. Ma, C. Liu, C. Chen, Q. Wu, X. Chen, and J. Lu, Performance of High Layer Thickness in Selective Laser Melting of Ti6Al4V, Materials, 2016, 9(12), p 1–1510.3390/ma9120975 ↗
16. M. Ma, Z. Wang, M. Gao, and X. Zeng, Layer Thickness Dependence of Performance in High-Power Selective Laser Melting of 1Cr18Ni9Ti Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 215(1), p 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.03410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.034 ↗
17. L. Jinhui, L. Ruidi, Z. Wenxian, F. Liding, and Y. Huashan, Study on Formation of Surface and Microstructure of Stainless Steel Part Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2010, 26(10), p 1259–1264. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328409X44130010.1179/174328409X441300 ↗
18. Y. Tian, D. Tomus, A. Huang, X. Wu, Experimental and Statistical Analysis on Process Parameters and Surface Roughness Relationship for Selective Laser Melting of Hastelloy X. Rapid Prototyp. J., 2019, 25(7), p 1309–131810.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0013 ↗
19. C. Qiu, C. Panwisawas, M. Ward, H.C. Basoalto, J.W. Brooks, and M.M. Attallah, On the Role of Melt Flow into the Surface Structure and Porosity Development during Selective Laser Melting, Acta Mater., 2015, 96, p 72–7910.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.004 ↗
20. Q.B. Nguyen, D.N. Luu, S.M.L. Nai, Z. Zhu, Z. Chen, and J. Wei, The Role of Powder Layer Thickness on the Quality of SLM Printed Parts, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2018, 18(3), p 948–95510.1016/j.acme.2018.01.015 ↗
21. German R.M.: Powder Metallurgy Science. 2. ed., Metal Powder Industries Federation (1994), https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=cat07470a&AN=clc.3b0a3a34.1055.428f.b36c.01e768155b07&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s3911979&authtype=sso&group=main&profile=eds.
22. W.E. King, H.D. Barth, V.M. Castillo, G.F. Gallegos, J.W. Gibbs, D.E. Hahn, C. Kamath, and A.M. Rubenchik, Observation of Keyhole-Mode Laser Melting in Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2014, 214(12), p 2915–2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005 ↗
23. R. Acharya, J.A. Sharon, and A. Staroselsky, Prediction of Microstructure in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process, Acta Mater., 2017, 124, p 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.01810.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.018 ↗
24. M.L. Montero-Sistiaga, S. Pourbabak, J. Van Humbeeck, D. Schryvers, and K. Vanmeensel, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hastelloy X Produced by HP-SLM (High Power Selective Laser Melting), Mater. Des., 2019, 165(2019), p 107598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10759810.1016/j.matdes.2019.107598 ↗
25. J. Metelkova, Y. Kinds, K. Kempen, C. de Formanoir, A. Witvrouw, and B. Van Hooreweder, On the Influence of Laser Defocusing in Selective Laser Melting of 316L, Addit. Manuf., 2018, 23, p 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.00610.1016/j.addma.2018.08.006 ↗
26. L.E. Criales, Y.M. Arısoy, B. Lane, S. Moylan, A. Donmez, and T. Özel, Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Nickel Alloy 625: Experimental Investigations of Effects of Process Parameters on Melt Pool Size and Shape with Spatter Analysis, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2016, 2017(121), p 22–36
27. W. Shifeng, L. Shuai, W. Qingsong, C. Yan, Z. Sheng, and S. Yusheng, Effect of Molten Pool Boundaries on the Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Melting Parts, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2014, 214(11), p 2660–2667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.002 ↗
28. S.-H. Sun, T. Ishimoto, K. Hagihara, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Hanawa, and T. Nakano, Excellent Mechanical and Corrosion Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steel with a Unique Crystallographic Lamellar Microstructure via Selective Laser Melting, Scr. Mater., 2019, 159, p 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.09.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.09.017 ↗
29. O. Andreau, I. Koutiri, P. Peyre, J.D. Penot, N. Saintier, E. Pessard, T. De Terris, C. Dupuy, and T. Baudin, Texture Control of 316L Parts by Modulation of the Melt Pool Morphology in Selective Laser Melting, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 264, p 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.04910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.049 ↗
30. D. Jorge-Badiola, A. Iza-Mendia, and I. Gutiérrez, Evaluation of Intragranular Misorientation Parameters Measured by EBSD in a Hot Worked Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Microsc., 2007, 228(3), p 373–38310.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01850.x ↗
31. K. Saeidi, X. Gao, F. Lofaj, L. Kvetková, and Z.J.J. Shen, Transformation of Austenite to Duplex Austenite-Ferrite Assembly in Annealed Stainless Steel 316L Consolidated by Laser Melting, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 633, p 463–46910.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.249 ↗
32. Y.J. Yin, J.Q. Sun, J. Guo, X.F. Kan, and D.C. Yang, Mechanism of High Yield Strength and Yield Ratio of 316 L Stainless Steel by Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2019, 744, p 773–77710.1016/j.msea.2018.12.092 ↗
33. M.S. Pham, B. Dovgyy, and P.A. Hooper, Twinning Induced Plasticity in Austenitic Stainless Steel 316L Made by Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2017, 704, p 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.08210.1016/j.msea.2017.07.082 ↗
34. K. Saeidi, X. Gao, Y. Zhong, and Z.J.J. Shen, Hardened Austenite Steel with Columnar Sub-Grain Structure Formed by Laser Melting, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2015, 625, p 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.01810.1016/j.msea.2014.12.018 ↗
35. D. Wang, C. Song, Y. Yang, and Y. Bai, Investigation of Crystal Growth Mechanism during Selective Laser Melting and Mechanical Property Characterization of 316L Stainless Steel Parts, Mater. Des., 2016, 100, p 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.11110.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.111 ↗
36. Y. Zhong, L. Liu, S. Wikman, D. Cui, and Z. Shen, Intragranular Cellular Segregation Network Structure Strengthening 316L Stainless Steel Prepared by Selective Laser Melting, J. Nucl. Mater., 2016, 470, p 170–17810.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.034 ↗
37. X. Wang, J.A. Muñiz-Lerma, O. Sánchez-Mata, M. Attarian Shandiz, and M. Brochu, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel 316L Vertical Struts Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2018, 736, p 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.06910.1016/j.msea.2018.08.069 ↗
38. S. Sinha, J.A. Szpunar, N.A.P. Kiran Kumar, and N.P. Gurao, Tensile Deformation of 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel Using In-Situ Electron Backscatter Diffraction and Crystal Plasticity Simulations, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2015, 637, p 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.00510.1016/j.msea.2015.04.005 ↗
39. C. Pauzon, E. Hryha, P. Forêt, and L. Nyborg, Effect of Argon and Nitrogen Atmospheres on the Properties of Stainless Steel 316 L Parts Produced by Laser-Powder Bed Fusion, Mater. Des., 2019, 179, p 10787310.1016/j.matdes.2019.107873 ↗