Geometric Limitation and Tensile Properties of Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing 5A06 Aluminum Alloy Parts
Source abstract
Abstract
Wire and arc additive manufacture (WAAM), as an emerging and promising technology of metal additive manufacturing, it lacks of experimental works to clarify the feature of geometrical configuration, microstructure and tensile properties, which can be used for further evaluating whether the as-deposited part can be used directly, and providing design reference for structure optimization. Taking 5A06 aluminum alloy additive manufacturing for example, in this paper, the geometric limitation and tensile property criteria are characterized using experimental method. The minimum angle and curvature radius that can be made by WAAM are 20° and 10 mm when the layer width is 7.2 mm. It shows isotropy when loading in build direction and perpendicular one. When loading in the direction of parallel and perpendicular to texture orientation, the tensile properties are anisotropic. The difference between them is 22 MPa.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Wang and R. Kovacevic, Rapid Prototyping Based on Variable Polarity Gas Tungsten Arc Welding for a 5356 Aluminium Alloy, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2001, 215, p 1519–152710.1243/0954405011519420 ↗
2. P. M. Dickens, M. S. Pridham, R. C. Cobb, I. Gibson, G. Dixon., Rapid prototyping using 3-D welding, in Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1992, p 280–290
3. A. F. Ribeiro, J. Norrish., Metal Based Rapid Prototyping for More Complex Shapes, in 6th Biennial International Conference on Computer Technology in Welding, TWI, Abington Publishing, Lanaken, Belgium, 9–12 June 1996
4. P. Kazanas, P. Deherkar, P. Almeida et al., Fabrication of Geometrical Features Using Wire and Arc Additive Manufacture, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2012, 226(6), p 1042–105110.1177/0954405412437126 ↗
5. N. Volpato, A. Franzoni, D.C. Luvizon et al., Identifying the Directions of a Set of 2D Contours for Additive Manufacturing Process Planning, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2013, 68(1–4), p 33–4310.1007/s00170-012-4706-y ↗
6. M.R. Dunlavey, Efficient Polygon-Filling Algorithms for Raster Displays, ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG), 1983, 2(4), p 264–27310.1145/245.248 ↗
7. V.T. Rajan, V. Srinivasan, and K.A. Tarabanis, The Optimal Zigzag Direction for Filling a Two-Dimensional Region, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2001, 7(5), p 231–24110.1108/13552540110410431 ↗
8. F. Ren, Y. Sun, and D. Guo, Combined Reparameterization-Based Spiral Toolpath Generation for Five-Axis Sculptured Surface Machining, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2009, 40(7–8), p 760–76810.1007/s00170-008-1385-9 ↗
9. D. Ding, Z.S. Pan, D. Cuiuri et al., A Tool-Path Generation Strategy for Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 73(1–4), p 173–18310.1007/s00170-014-5808-5 ↗
10. F. Wang, S. Williams, P. Colegrove et al., Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Wire and Arc Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2013, 44(2), p 968–97710.1007/s11661-012-1444-6 ↗