journal article·2019-01

Experimental Investigations for Optimizing the Extrusion Parameters on FDM PLA Printed Parts

Leipeng Yang, Shujuan Li, Yan Li, Mingshun Yang, Qilong Yuan

Publisher page

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) has become one of the most extensively used additive manufacturing technologies in recent years because of its wide adaptability, simple mechanism and low cost. It is difficult, however, to achieve an equitable trade-off among mechanical properties, surface finish quality and production time, which is an area seldom explored. This paper concentrates on the optimization of the parameters to achieve higher tensile strength and lower surface roughness with less build time during the FDM process based on central composite design for the tensile specimen forming process. The effects of five extrusion parameters (nozzle diameter, liquefier temperature, extrusion velocity, filling velocity and layer thickness) on the three outputs of tensile strength (TS), surface roughness (SR) and build time (BT) are investigated. Response surface methodology combined with nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II is developed to optimize the process parameters to achieve the maximum TS, minimum SR and BT, as verified by subsequent experiments. The predicted results are found to be very close to the experimental data, illustrating that the presented approach in this paper is effective for improving mechanical properties, surface finish and efficiency of the FDM process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. S. Ford and M. Despeisse, Additive Manufacturing and Sustainability: An Exploratory Study of the Advantages and Challenges, J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 137, p 1573–158710.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 ↗
2. J.W. Comb, W.R. Priedeman, and P.W. Turley, FDM Technology Process Improvements, University of Texas, Austin, 1994, p 42–49
3. P.F. Jacobs and D.T. Reid, Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing: Fundamentals of Stereolithography, SME Publication, Dearborn, 1992
4. J.J. Beaman, J.W. Barlow, D.L. Bourell, J.W. Barlow, R.H. Crawford, and K.P. McAlea, Solid Freeform Fabrication: A New Direction in Manufacturing, Springer, New York, 1997, p 25–4910.1007/978-1-4615-6327-3 ↗
5. M.E. Sachs, J.S. Haggerty, M.J. Cima, and P.A. Williams, Three dimensional printing techniques, US Patent, 5204055, 1993.
6. M. Feygin and B. Hsieh, Laminated object manufacturing (LOM): a simpler process. In: Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, p 123–130, 1991
7. O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood, J.L. Bhowmik et al., Effect of Process Parameters on Dynamic Mechanical Performance of FDM PC/ABS Printed Parts Through Design of Experiment, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25(7), p 1–1410.1007/s11665-016-2157-6 ↗
8. W.W. Yu, J. Zhang, J.R. Wu et al., Incorporation of Graphitic Nano-filler and Poly(lactic acid) in Fused Deposition Modeling, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2017, 134(15), p 4470310.1002/app.44703 ↗
9. C.C. Wang, T. Lin, and S. Hu, Optimizing the Rapid Prototyping Process by Integrating the Taguchi Method with the Gray Relational Analysis, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2007, 13(13), p 304–31510.1108/13552540710824814 ↗
10. J.W. Zhang and A.H. Peng, Process-Parameter Optimization for Fused Deposition Modeling Based on Taguchi Method, Adv. Mater. Res., 2012, 538-541, p 444–44710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.538-541.444 ↗
11. A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, and S.S. Mahapatra, Parametric Appraisal of Mechanical Property of Fused Deposition Modelling Processed Parts, Mater. Des., 2010, 31(1), p 287–29510.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
12. F. Rayegani and G.C. Onwubolu, Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Process Parameter Prediction and Optimization Using Group Method for Data Handling (GMDH) and Differential Evolution (DE), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 73(1-4), p 509–51910.1007/s00170-014-5835-2 ↗
13. M.S. Hossain, D. Espalin, J. Ramos et al., Improved Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling-Manufactured Parts Through Build Parameter Modifications, J. Manuf. Sci. E-T ASME, 2014, 136(6), p 12
14. A. Peng, X. Xiao, and R. Yue, Process Parameter Optimization for Fused Deposition Modeling Using Response Surface Methodology Combined with Fuzzy Inference System, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 73(1-4), p 87–10010.1007/s00170-014-5796-5 ↗
15. M. Dawoud, I. Taha, and S.J. Ebeid, Mechanical Behaviour of ABS: An Experimental Study Using FDM and Injection Moulding Techniques, J. Manuf. Process., 2016, 21, p 39–4510.1016/j.jmapro.2015.11.002 ↗
16. J. Torres, M. Cole, A. Owji et al., An Approach for Mechanical Property Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling with Polylactic Acid via Design of Experiments, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2016, 22(2), p 387–40410.1108/RPJ-07-2014-0083 ↗
17. B.N. Panda, K. Shankhwar, A. Garg et al., Performance Evaluation of Warping Characteristic of Fused Deposition Modelling Process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 88(5-8), p 1–13
18. R. Singh, S. Singh, and K. Mankotia, Development of ABS Based Wire as Feedstock Filament of FDM for Industrial Applications, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2016, 22(2), p 300–31010.1108/RPJ-07-2014-0086 ↗
19. O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood, and J.L. Bhowmik, Mathematical Modeling and FDM Process Parameters Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology Based on Q-Optimal Design, Appl. Math. Model., 2016, 40(23-24), p 10052–1007310.1016/j.apm.2016.06.055 ↗
20. E. Vahabli and S. Rahmati, Application of an RBF Neural Network for FDM Parts’ Surface Roughness Prediction for Enhancing Surface Quality, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manag., 2016, 17(12), p 1589–160310.1007/s12541-016-0185-7 ↗
21. B. Standards, Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 1: General Principles (ISO 527-1:2012). CEN/TC 249—Plastics
22. The technical data sheet of the PolyPlus-PLA characteristics. http://www.polymaker.com , 2017. Accessed 26 June 2017
23. Ö. Bayraktar, G. Uzun, R.C. Akiroğlu et al., Experimental Study on the 3D-Printed Plastic Parts and Predicting the Mechanical Properties Using Artificial Neural Networks, Polym. Adv. Technol., 2017, 28, p 1044–105110.1002/pat.3960 ↗
24. N.S.A. Bakar, M.R. Alkahari, and H. Boejang, Analysis on Fused Deposition Modelling Performance, J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A, 2010, 11(12), p 972–97710.1631/jzus.A1001365 ↗
25. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal et al., A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2002, 6(2), p 182–19710.1109/4235.996017 ↗