journal article·2019-02Open access

In Situ Quality Monitoring in AM Using Acoustic Emission: A Reinforcement Learning Approach

K. Wasmer, T. Le-Quang, B. Meylan, S. A. Shevchik

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has attracted considerable attention in recent years. This technology overcomes the geometrical limits of workpieces produced with the traditional subtractive methods and so gives the opportunity to manufacture highly complex shapes. Unfortunately, the repeatability of the manufacturing process and the monitoring of quality are not reliable enough to be utilized in mass production. The quality monitoring of AM processes in commercial equipment has been largely based on temperature measurements of the process zone or high-resolution imaging of the layers. However, both techniques lack information about the physical phenomena taking place in the depth of the materials medium and this limits their reliability in real-life applications. To overcome those restrictions, we propose to combine acoustic emission and reinforcement learning. The former captures the information about the subsurface dynamics of the process. The latter is a branch of machine learning that allows interpreting the received data in terms of quality. The combination of both is an original method for in situ and real-time quality monitoring. Acoustic data were collected during a real process using a commercial AM machine. The process parameters were selected to achieve three levels of quality in terms of porosity concentration while manufacturing a stainless steel 316L cuboid shape. Using our method, we demonstrated that each level of quality produced unique acoustic signatures during the build that were recognized by the classifier. The classification accuracy reached in this work proves that the proposed method has high potential to be used as in situ and real-time monitoring of AM quality.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Y.W. Zhai, D.A. Lados, and J.L. Lagoy, Additive Manufacturing: Making Imagination the Major Limitation, JOM, 2014, 66(5), p 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-0886-210.1007/s11837-014-0886-2 ↗
2. N. Guo and M. Leu, Additive Manufacturing: Technology, Applications and Research Needs, Front. Mech. Eng., 2013, 8(3), p 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-810.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
3. W.W. Wits, S.J. Weitkamp, and J. van Es, Metal Additive Manufacturing of a High-Pressure Micro-Pump, Proc. CIRP, 2013, 7, p 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.04310.1016/j.procir.2013.05.043 ↗
4. D.A. Türk, R. Kussmaul, M. Zogg, C. Klahn, A.B. Spierings, H. Könen, P. Ermanni, and M. Meboldt, In Additive Manufacturing with Composites for Integrated Aircraft Structures, SAMPE Conference Proceedings, Long Beach, CA, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-01069152610.3929/ethz-a-010691526 ↗
5. M. Salmi, J. Tuomi, K.S. Paloheimo, R. Björkstrand, M. Paloheimo, J. Salo, R. Kontio, K. Mesimäki, and A.A. Mäkitie, Patient-Specific Reconstruction with 3D Modeling and DMLS Additive Manufacturing, Rapid Prototyp. J., 2012, 18(3), p 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211218126 (Special issue: Medical advances in Additive Manufacturing)10.1108/13552541211218126 ↗
6. K. Kunze, T. Etter, J. Grässlin, and V. Shklover, Texture, Anisotropy in Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of IN738LC Alloy Processed by Selective Laser Melting (SLM), Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 620, p 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.00310.1016/j.msea.2014.10.003 ↗
7. G. Tapia and A. Elwany, A Review on Process Monitoring and Control in Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng, 2014, 136(6), p 060801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402854010.1115/1.4028540 ↗
8. K.S. Everton, M. Hirsch, P. Stravroulakis, R.K. Leach, and A.T. Clare, Review of In-situ Process Monitoring and In-situ Metrology for Metal Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Des., 2016, 95, p 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.09910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
9. M. Grasso and B.M. Colosimo, Process Defects and In Situ Monitoring Methods in Metal Powder Bed Fusion: A Review, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2017, 28, p 044005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f ↗
10. T. Craeghs, S. Clijsters, J.P. Kruth, F. Bechmann, and M.C. Ebert, Detection of Process Failures in Layerwise Laser Melting with Optical Process Monitoring, Phys. Proc., 2012, 39, p 753–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.09710.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.097 ↗
11. S. Clijsters, T. Craeghs, S. Buls, K. Kempen, and J.P. Kruth, In Situ Quality Control of the Selective Laser Melting Process Using a High-Speed, Real-Time Melt Pool Monitoring System, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 75, p 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6214-810.1007/s00170-014-6214-8 ↗
12. S. Berumen, F. Bechmann, S. Lindner, J.P. Kruth, and T. Craeghs, Quality Control of Laser-and Powder Bed-Based Additive Manufacturing (AM) Technologies, Phys. Proc., 2010, 5, p 617–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.08910.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.089 ↗
13. L. Scime and J. Beuth, Anomaly Detection and Classification in a Laser Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Process Using a Trained Computer Vision Algorithm, Addit. Manuf., 2018, 19, p 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00910.1016/j.addma.2017.11.009 ↗
14. C. Zhao, K. Fezzaa, R.W. Cunningham, H. Wen, F. De Carlo, L. Chen, A.D. Rollett, and T. Sun, Real-Time Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Using High-Speed x-ray Imaging and Diffraction, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, p 3602. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03761-210.1038/s41598-017-03761-2 ↗
15. T.L. Quang, S.A. Shevchik, B. Meylan, F. Vakili-Farahani, M.P. Olbinado, A. Rack, and K. Wasmer, Why Is In Situ Quality Control of Laser Keyhole Welding A Real Challenge? Proc. CIRP, 2018, 74C, p 649–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.05510.1016/j.procir.2018.08.055 ↗
16. K. Wasmer, T.L. Quang, B. Meylan, F. Vakili-Farahani, M.P. Olbinado, A. Rack, and S.A. Shevchik, Laser Processing Quality Monitoring by Combining Acoustic Emission and Machine Learning: High-Speed x-ray Imaging to Close the Gap, Proc. CIRP, 2018, 74C, p 654–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.05410.1016/j.procir.2018.08.054 ↗
17. A. Thompson, I. Maskery, and R.K. Leach, X-ray Computed Tomography for Additive Manufacturing: A Review, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2016, 27(7), p 072001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/07200110.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001 ↗
18. C. Grosse and M. Ohtsu, Ed., Acoustic Emission Testing Basics for Research - Applications in Civil Engineering, 1st ed., Springer, Berlin, 2008
19. D. Ye, G.S. Hong, Y. Zhang, K. Zhu, J. Ying, and H. Fuh, Defect Detection in Selective Laser Melting Technology by Acoustic Signals with Deep Belief Networks, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 96, p 2791–2801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1728-010.1007/s00170-018-1728-0 ↗
20. F. Saeidi, S.A. Shevchik, and K. Wasmer, Automatic Detection of Scuffing Using Acoustic Emission, Tribol. Int., 2016, 94, p 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.02110.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.021 ↗
21. S.A. Shevchik, F. Saeidi, B. Meylan, and K. Wasmer, Prediction of Failure in Lubricated Surfaces Using Acoustic Time-Frequency Features and Random Forest Algorithm, IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., 2017, 13, p 1541–1553. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2016.263508210.1109/TII.2016.2635082 ↗
22. S.A. Shevchik, B. Meylan, A. Mosaddeghi, and K. Wasmer, Acoustic Characterization of Solid Materials Pre-Weakening Using Electric Discharge, IEEE Access, 2018, 6(1), p 40313–40324. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.285366610.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853666 ↗
23. K. Wasmer, C. Kenel, C. Leinenbach, and S.A. Shevchik, In Situ and Real-Time Monitoring of Powder-Bed AM by Combining Acoustic Emission and Artificial Intelligence, Industrializing Additive Manufacturing - Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications - AMPA2017, M. Meboldt and C. Klahn, Ed., Springer, Cham, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_2010.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_20 ↗
24. S.A. Shevchik, C. Kenel, C. Leinenbach, and K. Wasmer, Acoustic Emission for In Situ Quality Monitoring in Additive Manufacturing Using Spectral Convolutional Neural Networks, Addit. Manuf., 2018, 21, p 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.01210.1016/j.addma.2017.11.012 ↗
25. F. Vakili-Farahani, J. Lungershausen, and K. Wasmer, Wavelet Analysis of Light Emission Signals in Laser Beam Welding. J. Laser Appl., 2017, 29(2), p 022424. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.498350710.2351/1.4983507 ↗
26. R. Kashyap, Fiber Bragg Grating, 2nd ed., Elsevier Inc., London, UK, 2010
27. L. Thijs, F. Verhaeghe, T. Craeghs, J.V. Humbeeck, and J.P. Kruth, A Study of the Microstructural Evolution During Selective Laser Melting of Ti–6Al–4 V, Acta Mater., 2010, 58(9), p 3303–3312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.00410.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 ↗
28. R.S. Sutton and A.G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed., The MIT Press, Cambridge, London, England, 2018
29. L.P. Kaelbling, M.L. Littman, and A.W. Moore, Reinforcement Learning: A Survey, J. Artif. Intell. Res., 1996, 4, p 237–28510.1613/jair.301 ↗
30. D. Silver and A. Huang, Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search, Nature, 2016, 529, p 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1696110.1038/nature16961 ↗
31. J.M. Quentin, B. Huysa, C. Anthony, and S. Peggy, Reward-Based Learning, Model-Based and Model-Free, Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, D. Jaeger and R. Jung, Ed., Springer, New York, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_674-110.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_674-1 ↗
32. F. Glover and M. Laguna, Tabu Search, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 199710.1007/978-1-4615-6089-0 ↗
33. C. Robert and G. Casella, Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, 2nd ed., Springer Science, New York, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-210.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2 ↗