journal article·2023-10-01Open access

Bio-Physical Properties of Acetylated Chitosan/Poly(ɛ-Caprolactone) Composites for Three-Dimensional Printing Material Applications

Jin Ik Lim

Abstract

For three-dimensional (3D) printing material applications in tissue engineering, acetylated chitosan (AC)/poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) composites were prepared by the melt mixing method using the acetylation of chitosan with PCL. The physiochemical properties of the AC/PCL composites were examined by measuring the water contact angles, dispersity of AC on the cross-section using scanning electron microscopy, and temperature stability. In addition, mechanical properties such as tensile strength and bending stress recovery were measured to determine the elasticity of the composite films. The fibroblast cell line NIH-3T3 was used to test the relative cell affinities based on the AC content and cell viability on AC/PCL at various temperatures. There was no difference between the melting points and tensile strengths of the AC/PCL composites and pure PCL. Overall, the AC/PCL composites showed high initial cell adhesion after 4 h of cell culture and increased cell proliferation compared to those of PCL composites used as a control. Based on these tests, an AC of 10.7 wt% was determined to be the optimal composition for the AC/PCL composite. Thus, these composites can be used in various 3D printing material applications in tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e0016710.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00167 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.11080710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110807 ↗
3. Lee SM, , Lim JI. Cell selective double-sided membrane using lotus-leaf-like structured and acetylated chitosan. J Biomater Tiss Eng, 2019; 9:1–5.
4. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.01.01810.1016/j.ejpb.2021.01.018 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10986510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109865 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11237310.1016/j.msec.2021.112373 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.02.01410.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.02.014 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.02710.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.027 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.10114510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145 ↗
11. 10.1002/advs.20200375110.1002/advs.202003751 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0000810.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008 ↗
13. 10.18063/ijb.v8i1.42410.18063/ijb.v8i1.424 ↗
14. 10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab ↗
15. 10.1371/journal.pone.021677610.1371/journal.pone.0216776 ↗
16. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab603410.1088/1758-5090/ab6034 ↗
17. 10.18063/ijb.v6i1.24210.18063/ijb.v6i1.242 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.04510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.045 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11695210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116952 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12592910.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125929 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11252510.1016/j.msec.2021.112525 ↗
23. Liu Q, , Lu WF, , Zhai W. Toward stronger robocast calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A mini-review and meta-analysis. Mater Sci Eng C, 2021; 29:112578.
24. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.04110.1016/j.addr.2007.08.041 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.01710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.00410.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11237210.1016/j.msec.2021.112372 ↗
28. Cestari F, , Petretta M, , Yang Y, et al. 3D printing of PCL/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds derived from biogenic sources for bone tissue engineering. Sustainable Mater Technol, 2021; 29:e00318.
29. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.09.00310.1016/j.aiepr.2019.09.003 ↗
30. 10.1089/3dp.2018.008910.1089/3dp.2018.0089 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.00810.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.008 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.04510.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.045 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.039 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cis.2018.11.00810.1016/j.cis.2018.11.008 ↗
36. 10.1166/jbns.2018.158010.1166/jbns.2018.1580 ↗
37. 10.1166/jbns.2018.156310.1166/jbns.2018.1563 ↗
38. Freier T, , Koh HS, , Kazazian K, et al. Controlling cell adhesion and degradation of chitosan films by N-acetylation. Biomaterials, 2005; 26;5872–5878.
39. 10.1177/088532820504989710.1177/0885328205049897 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0321841310.1007/BF03218413 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0153610.1021/acsabm.0c01536 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10934-011-9502-910.1007/s10934-011-9502-9 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10934-016-0339-010.1007/s10934-016-0339-0 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.03710.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.037 ↗