Finite Element Analysis and Machine Learning in the Loop Additive Manufacturing Process Parameter Optimization to Acquire the Desired Dynamics of Manufactured Parts
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, a constrained optimization procedure was presented that adjusts processing parameters of powder bed fusion (PBF) process to acquire desired dynamic behavior of produced parts, particularly in case of geometrical design of part to be produced have already confirmed and not possible to change. This procedure includes the combination of machine learning (ML) and finite element method (FEM) in the loop to correlate between processing parameters and dynamic response of parts. PBF production technique has leading processing parameters (laser power, scanning speed, hatch distance, and beam diameter) which have effect on mechanical properties of produced parts, for example, stiffness, elasticity, or mass density. Among different mechanical properties there are some properties which are related with dynamic behavior of parts. Thus, understanding the effect of processing parameters on mechanical properties is a crucial step to predict dynamic behavior of part especially where part design has already completed and not allowed to change in geometry. To do that, mechanical properties were acquired by the experimental data and semi-analytical equations were created accordingly by ML models. Then, the equations were used in FEM to get dynamic responses such as natural frequencies and mode shapes of produced parts in an optimization procedure. Overall, experimental data were correlated with numerical FEM model in the loop of optimization cycle to find desired dynamic behavior from produced parts. Eventually, it is proofed that natural frequencies are function of material properties but mode shapes were not affected by changing material constants. In addition, proposed method showed that dynamic behavior of PBF produced parts (elasticity modulus, relative density, etc.) can be modified by optimizing processing parameters of production process, including FEM and ML in the loop of constrained optimization problem where the final part design has already fixed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Additive Manufacturing Technologies Application and Research Center (EKTAM), Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00002-610.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00002-6 ↗
2. Alridha A, , Fadhil Abdalhasan W, , Mazin Kareem Kadhim L. Training analysis of optimization models in machine learning. Int. J. of Nonli Analy Appli, 2021; 1453–1461.
3. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.00310.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.003 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-319-12304-2_510.1007/978-3-319-12304-2_5 ↗
5. Criales LE, , Arısoy YM, , Lane B, et al. Predictive modeling and optimization of multi-track processing for laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625. Addit Manuf, 2017; 13:14–36.
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15801810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158018 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10943310.1016/j.matdes.2020.109433 ↗
8. 10.1089/3dp.2021.018010.1089/3dp.2021.0180 ↗
9. Wu Y, , Li M, , Wang J, et al. Powder-bed-fusion additive manufacturing of molybdenum: Process simulation, optimization, and property prediction. Addit. Manuf., 2022; 58:103069.
10. 10.1007/s00170-020-05879-610.1007/s00170-020-05879-6 ↗
11. 10.3390/met1207115410.3390/met12071154 ↗
12. 10.3390/jmmp301002110.3390/jmmp3010021 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.403757010.1115/1.4037570 ↗
14. 10.1007/s40964-022-00337-z10.1007/s40964-022-00337-z ↗
15. 10.3390/app1213665310.3390/app12136653 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.404062210.1115/1.4040622 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11733410.1016/j.jsv.2022.117334 ↗
18. 10.21595/jve.2020.2135010.21595/jve.2020.21350 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.20410.1016/j.procir.2017.12.204 ↗
20. 10.1111/ffe.1355910.1111/ffe.13559 ↗
21. Kononenko O Kononenko I. Machine learning and finite element method for physical systems modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.07337 2018.
22. 10.1007/s00466-020-01952-910.1007/s00466-020-01952-9 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.10112310.1016/j.apmt.2021.101123 ↗
24. 10.3390/machines1007052510.3390/machines10070525 ↗
25. Razvi SS et al. A review of machine learning applications in additive manufacturing. International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Vol. 59179. American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2019.10.1115/DETC2019-98415 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1504136210.3390/ma15041362 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10881810.1016/j.matdes.2020.108818 ↗
28. Cilimkovic M. Neural networks and back propagation algorithm. Institute of Technology Blanchardstown, Blanchardstown Road North Dublin. 2015; 15:1.
29. 10.1017/S096249290000251810.1017/S0962492900002518 ↗
30. Gill PE, , Michael A, , Saunders E, et al. On the performance of SQP methods for nonlinear optimization. Modeling and optimization: Theory and applications: MOPTA, Bethlehem, PA, 2014. Sel. Contri. Springer International Publishing, 2015.
31. Bashir HA, , Liang X. Interior point method based sequential quadratic programming algorithm with quadratic search for nonlinear optimization. Int. J. Comp. Info. Sys. Ind. Manage. Appl., 2011; 3:51–60.
32. 10.1007/PL0001139110.1007/PL00011391 ↗
33. 10.1051/e3sconf/20202021400110.1051/e3sconf/202020214001 ↗
34. Maconachie TN. The dynamic behaviour of AlSi10Mg lattice structures fabricated via selective laser melting. Diss. RMIT University, 2022.
35. Li G, , Liu Q, , Han X, et al. Influence study of flow separation on the nozzle vibration response. Prop. Power Res., 2016; 5(2):108–117.
36. Gradl PR Greene SE Protz C et al. Additive manufacturing of liquid rocket engine combustion devices: A summary of process developments and hot-fire testing results. 2018 Joint propulsion conference.10.2514/6.2018-4625 ↗
37. 10.3390/met1209149410.3390/met12091494 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.17110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.171 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.55110.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.551 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma1604168010.3390/ma16041680 ↗
41. 10.1088/1742-6596/2472/1/01206510.1088/1742-6596/2472/1/012065 ↗
42. Violett RS. Space shuttle main engine structural analysis and data reduction/evaluation. Main Inje LOX Inlet Anal, 1989; 5(NASA-CR-183668).