Microstructure and Biomechanical Properties in Selective Laser Melting of Porous Metal Implants
Source abstract
Abstract
Two kinds of porous structure design strategies, ring-support (RS) and column-support (CS), are proposed for human implants. The accurate design of porosity is realized by adjusting the pore characteristics, such as strut diameter, pore diameter, and unit size. Porous specimens with porosity of 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% were prepared by selective laser melting. The three-dimensional pore structure is basically consistent with the design characteristics, and the measured porosity is slightly lower than design value. The microstructure, microhardness, and friction and wear properties of the samples were studied. The results show that the performance along the scanning orientation is slightly better than that along the forming orientation. The compression and dynamic elastic modulus of porous specimens with different structures and porosities were analyzed. The CS porous with 60–80% porosity has suitable compressive strength and elastic modulus, which is close to that of human tissue, and effectively avoids the stress shielding phenomenon.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
School of Computer Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China.
Laser Technology Institute, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adhm.20200072410.1002/adhm.202000724 ↗
2. 10.1039/C7TB00741H10.1039/C7TB00741H ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11034210.1016/j.msec.2019.110342 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.04910.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.01310.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.013 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.09410.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.028 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00693.x10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00693.x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.00610.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.20310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.203 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cad.2010.06.00610.1016/j.cad.2010.06.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.05.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.05.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.06.00510.1016/j.rcim.2015.06.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.03.05610.1016/j.matlet.2009.03.056 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.020 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.02610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.026 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y ↗
19. 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.075310.1089/ten.tea.2012.0753 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.intermet.2010.11.01710.1016/j.intermet.2010.11.017 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.02010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.020 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.07.00510.1016/j.dental.2017.07.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1003-6326(20)65482-610.1016/S1003-6326(20)65482-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.10210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.102 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12879810.1016/j.matlet.2020.128798 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.02910.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.029 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.19010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.190 ↗