journal article·2024-04-01Open access

On the Difference in Mechanical Behavior of Glass Bead-Filled Polyamide 12 Specimens Produced by Laser Sintering and Injection Molding

Hellen De Coninck, Sebastian Meyers, Peter Van Puyvelde, Brecht Van Hooreweder

Abstract

An increasing demand for additively manufactured polymer composites with optimized mechanical properties is manifesting in different industries such as aerospace, biomedical, and automotive. Laser sintering (LS) is an additive manufacturing method that has the potential to produce reinforced polymers, which can meet the stringent requirements of these industries. For the development of a commercially viable LS nylon-based composite material, previous research studies worldwide have focused on adding glass beads to the powder material with the goal to produce fully dense parts with properties more representative of injection molded (IM) thermoplastic composites. This led to the development of a commercially available glass bead-filled polyamide 12 (PA12) powder. Although this powder has been on the market for quite a while, an in-depth comparison of the mechanical behavior of laser sintered versus IM glass bead-filled PA12 is lacking. In this study, laser-sintered glass bead-filled PA12 samples were built in different orientations and compared to IM counterparts. After sample production, the mechanical performance of the produced LS and IM parts was tested and compared to evaluate the quasistatic and dynamic mechanical performance and failure mechanisms at different load levels. In addition, the glass bead-filled PA12 properties were also compared to those of standard (unfilled) LS PA12 to assess whether glass beads actually improve the mechanical performance and fatigue lifetime of the final LS samples, as suggested in literature. Results in this work present and explain the increased stiffness but decreased fatigue life of glass bead-filled polyamide parts made by LS and IM. This research can be regarded as a “benchmark” study, in which samples produced from commercially available, filled and unfilled, PA12 powder grades are compared for both LS and conventional production techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

KU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing Processes and Systems (MaPS), Leuven, Belgium.

KU Leuven, Department of Chemical Engineering, Soft Matter, Rheology and Technology (SMaRT), Leuven, Belgium.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
2. 10.1108/0144515031069865210.1108/01445150310698652 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.04.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.04.014 ↗
4. Frketic J, , Dickens T and Ramakrishnan S. Automated manufacturing and processing of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites: An additive review of contemporary and modern techniques for advanced materials manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2017; 14(4):69–86; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.01.003
5. Kruth J, , Levy G, , Schindel R, et al. Consolidation of polymer powders by selective laser sintering. In: International Conference on Polymers and Moulds Innovations, 2008; pp. 15–30.
6. Kruth JP, , Mercelis P, , Van Vaerenbergh J, et al. Advances in selective laser sintering. In: Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, 2003; pp. 59–70.
7. 10.1243/095440504232348710.1243/0954405042323487 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.03710.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.037 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.01.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.01.014 ↗
10. 10.1002/pen.2345910.1002/pen.23459 ↗
11. Cheung L Gibson I. Effects of graphite powder on the laser sintering behaviour of polycarbonate. 2002; 8(4):233–242; doi: 10.1108/1355254021044114810.1108/13552540210441148 ↗
12. Kozior T. Assessment of mechanical properties of Pa 3200 Gf polyamide models made by SLS. Czas Tech, 2018; 11(115):181–186; doi: 10.4467/2353737xct.18.173.9429
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.11210.1016/j.msea.2006.07.112 ↗
14. Mousah A. Effects of filler content and coupling agents on the mechanical properties and geometrical accuracy of selective laser sintered parts in glass bead-filled polyamide 12 composites. 2011; 4(June):227–231.
15. 10.1002/admt.20180027110.1002/admt.201800271 ↗
16. Forderhase P, , Mc Alea K, and Booth R. The development of an SLS composite material. In: International Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings, 1995; pp. 287–297.
17. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.07.03510.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.07.035 ↗
18. Salazar A, , Cano Aragón AJ, , Rodríguez J. Fatigue life assessment of polyamide 12 processed by selective laser sintering. Damage modelling according to fracture mechanics. Rapid Prototyp J, 2021;ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print); doi: 10.1108/RPJ-06-2021-0142
19. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.001 ↗
20. Van Hooreweder B. Development of accelerated multi-axial fatigue tests based on scaling laws (Ontwikkeling van Versnelde Multi-Axiale Levensduurtesten Op Basis van Schaalwetten). 2013.
21. 10.1007/s00170-020-06026-x10.1007/s00170-020-06026-x ↗
22. 10.1007/s10973-018-7307-710.1007/s10973-018-7307-7 ↗
23. Gogolewski S, , Czerntawska K, , Gastorek M. Effect of annealing on thermal properties and crystalline structure of polyamides. Nylon, 12 (Polylaurolactam). Colloid Polym Sci 1980 25810, 1980; 258(10):1130–1136; doi: 10.1007/BF01382456
24. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.09.04210.1016/j.optlastec.2016.09.042 ↗
25. Safai L, , Cuellar JS, , Smit G, et al. A review of the fatigue behavior of 3D printed polymers. Addit Manuf, 2019; 28(April):87–97; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.023
26. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.12.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.12.006 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.02910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.029 ↗
28. Bernasconi A, , Armanni C. Role of fillers in the fatigue behaviour of a short glass fibre reinforced polyamide. In: Materials Science, Engineering, 2008.
29. 10.1002/app.2082210.1002/app.20822 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.1014210.1002/pc.10142 ↗
31. 10.1177/0021998321105419010.1177/00219983211054190 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.501679110.1063/1.5016791 ↗