journal article·2023-06-01Open access

Automated Defect Recognition for Additive Manufactured Parts Using Machine Perception and Visual Saliency

Jan Petrich, Edward W. Reutzel

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) is known to produce internal defects that can impact performance. As the technology becomes more mainstream, there is a growing need to establish nondestructive inspection technologies that can assess and quantify build quality with high confidence. This article presents a complete, three-dimensional (3D) solution for automated defect recognition in AM parts using X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans. The algorithm uses a machine perception framework to automatically separate visually salient regions, that is, anomalous voxels, from the CT background. Compared with supervised approaches, the proposed concept relies solely on visual cues in 3D similar to those used by human operators in two-dimensional (2D) assuming no a priori information about defect appearance, size, and/or shape. To ingest any arbitrary part geometry, a binary mask is generated using statistical measures that separate lighter, material voxels from darker, background voxels. Therefore, no additional part or scan information, such as CAD files, STL models, or laser scan vector data, is needed. Visual saliency is established using multiscale, symmetric, and separable 3D convolution kernels. Separability of the convolution kernels is paramount when processing CT scans with potentially billions of voxels because it allows for parallel processing and thus faster execution of the convolution operation in single dimensions. Based on the CT scan resolution, kernel sizes may be adjusted to identify defects of different sizes. All adjacent anomalous voxels are subsequently merged to form defect clusters, which in turn reveals additional information regarding defect size, morphology, and orientation to the user, information that may be linked to mechanical properties, such as fatigue response. The algorithm was implemented in MATLAB™ using hardware acceleration, that is, graphics processing unit support, and tested on CT scans of AM components available at the Center for Innovative Materials Processing through Direct Digital Deposition (CIMP-3D) at Penn State's Applied Research Laboratory. Initial results show adequate processing times of just a few minutes and very low false-positive rates, especially when addressing highly salient and larger defects. All developed analytic tools can be simplified to accommodate 2D images.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09506608.2015.111664910.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 ↗
2. Gong H · Addit Manuf · 2014 · 4 · 87
3. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.12.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.12.015 ↗
4. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.151910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.1519 ↗
5. 10.1108/1355254111115650410.1108/13552541111156504 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.05410.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.054 ↗
7. 7. Gegner J. 2D-3D conversion of object size distributions in quantitative metallography. In: Proceedings of the MMT-2006 Conference, Ariel, Israel, 2006.
8. Anton du Plessis · 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing · 2018
9. 10.1007/s10921-013-0216-610.1007/s10921-013-0216-6 ↗
10. Hou W · J Phys Conf Series · 2017 · 933
11. 11. Mery D, Arteta C. Automatic defect recognition in X-ray testing using computer vision. In: 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). Santa Rosa, CA, 2017; pp. 1026–1035.10.1109/WACV.2017.119 ↗
12. 12. Itti, Laurent, and Christof Koch. “Learning to detect salient objects in natural scenes using visual attention.” Image Understanding Workshop. 1999.
13. 13. Faiza M, Nacereddine N. Multiclass classification of weld defects in radiographic images based on support vector machines. In: 2014 Tenth International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems. Marrakech, Morocco, 2014.
14. 14. Lawson S, Parker G. Intelligent segmentation of industrial radiographic images using neural networks. In: Proceedings of SPIE. Boston, MA, United States: The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1994.10.1117/12.188736 ↗
15. Park HS · Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci · 2015 · 373
16. 16. Jayaraman TV. Principles of radiography. In: ASM Handbook, Volume 17: Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials. Materials Park: ASM International 2018; pp. 383–409.10.31399/asm.hb.v17.a0006448 ↗
17. 17. ASTM International. E1441-19, Standard Guide for Computed Tomography (CT). West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2019.
18. 10.1109/TMI.2019.292192910.1109/TMI.2019.2921929 ↗
19. 19. McLachlan G, Peel D. Finite Mixture Models. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.10.1002/0471721182 ↗
20. 20. Shapiro, LG, Stockman GC. Computer vision. The University of California, Los Angeles, CA: Prentice Hall, 2001; pp. 137–150.
21. 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.117715610.1109/TPAMI.2003.1177156 ↗
22. Morgan JP · 2017
23. 10.1109/34.73055810.1109/34.730558 ↗
24. 10.1109/TCSVT.2018.287083210.1109/TCSVT.2018.2870832 ↗
25. Gobert C · Addit Manuf J · 2018 · 21 · 517
26. 26. Mathworks Inc., Find connected components in binary images via bwconncomp , MATLAB documentation, 2020.
27. Merdes T · 2020
28. 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.01010.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗