Design of Lattice Structures Based on U* Load Path Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Lattice structures are widely used in lightweight structural components and energy absorption parts. While topology optimization addresses desirable density distribution in lattice structures, there is yet no definitive solution for finding an optimum lattice layout. Since load path analysis can reveal the most efficient route for load transfer, it is preferable to align the lattice trusses with load paths for optimal structural performance. In this work, U* load path analysis is used to tailor the unit cell geometries of body-centered cubic lattice structures. The lattice layout is first determined by stiffness lines and potential lines derived from U* field in the design domain. The truss diameters are then numerically optimized to generate the lattice structure with functionally graded properties. This methodology is validated by a design problem of a cantilever structure. Results from finite element simulations and experimental tests on specimens fabricated by selective laser sintering demonstrate that the U* graded design has a significantly higher specific stiffness and strength compared with the benchmark design with a uniform cell arrangement. This approach enables engineers to create new design concepts of lattice structures with the integration of physically determined load paths.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Cellular and Composite Structures · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Tao W Leu MC. Design of lattice structure for additive manufacturing. In: 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA). IEEE Cleveland OH 2016.10.1109/ISFA.2016.7790182 ↗
2. Bendsoe MP Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media 2003.
3. Brackett D Ashcroft I Hague R. Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. In Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin TX 2011.
4. 10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.01010.1016/j.cma.2018.10.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00810.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.404681210.1115/1.4046812 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.01110.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.011 ↗
8. Michell AGM. LVIII. The limits of economy of material in frame-structures. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci, 1904; 8:589–597.
9. Maxwell JC. XLV. On reciprocal figures and diagrams of forces. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci, 1864; 27:250–261.
10. Li Y Chen Y. Beam structure optimization for additive manufacturing based on principal stress lines. In: 2010 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium University of Texas at Austin Texas 2010.
11. 10.1016/j.cad.2016.07.00510.1016/j.cad.2016.07.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.06310.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.063 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.03110.1016/j.procir.2013.09.031 ↗
14. Tang Y Zhao Y. Lattice-skin structures design with orientation optimization. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin TX 2015.
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.08210.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.082 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.05310.1016/j.cma.2019.05.053 ↗
17. 10.1051/ijsmdo/200901410.1051/ijsmdo/2009014 ↗
18. 10.4271/2011-01-006110.4271/2011-01-0061 ↗
19. Sakurai T Tanaka J Otani A et al. Load path optimization and U* structural analysis for passenger car compartments under frontal collision. In: SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2734 SAE 2003.10.4271/2003-01-2734 ↗
20. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.197-198.112910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.197-198.1129 ↗
21. 10.1299/kikaia.79.165710.1299/kikaia.79.1657 ↗
22. 10.1080/15397734.2017.134967110.1080/15397734.2017.1349671 ↗
23. 10.1299/jmmp.1.132210.1299/jmmp.1.1322 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.01210.1016/j.cma.2018.10.012 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.aei.2020.10118410.1016/j.aei.2020.101184 ↗
26. Wang E, , Yoshikuni Y, , Guo Q, et al. Load transfer in truck cab structures under initial phase of frontal collision. Int J Veh Struct Syst, 2010; 2:60–68.
27. 10.1007/s12239-018-0068-210.1007/s12239-018-0068-2 ↗
28. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298961710.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989617 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10094210.1016/j.addma.2019.100942 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11368910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113689 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.finel.2011.03.00710.1016/j.finel.2011.03.007 ↗
32. Jobard B Lefer W. Creating evenly-spaced streamlines of arbitrary density. In: Visualization in Scientific Computing '97 Springer Boulogne-sur-Mer France April 28–30 1997; pp.43–55.10.1007/978-3-7091-6876-9_5 ↗