Comparative Performance Study of Acidic Pumice and Basic Pumice Inclusions for Acrylonitrile–Butadiene–Styrene-Based Composite Filaments
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effective use of porous pumice powder as an additive in acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS)-based composite materials. The influence of pumice addition on mechanical, thermomechanical, thermal, and physical properties of ABS filaments was reported. Two types of pumice, namely acidic pumice (AP) and basic pumice (BP), were melt compounded with ABS at loading levels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight using the melt extrusion preparation method. Composites were shaped into dog bone test specimens by the injection molding process. The physical properties of pumice powders were investigated by particle size analysis and X-ray spectroscopy techniques. Mechanical, thermomechanical, thermal, melt flow, and morphological behaviors of ABS/AP and ABS/BP composite filaments were proposed. According to test results, pumice addition led to an increase in the mechanical response of ABS up to a filling ratio of 10%. Further inclusion of pumice caused sharp reduction due to the possible agglomeration of pumice particles. Composites filled with AP yielded remarkably higher mechanical performance in terms of tensile, impact, and hardness strength compared with BP-loaded composites. According to thermal analyses, ABS exhibited higher thermal stability after incorporation of AP and BP. Pumice addition also resulted in raising the glass transition temperature of ABS. Melt flow index (MFI) findings revealed that addition of two types of pumice led to an opposite trend in the melt flow behavior of ABS filaments. Homogeneous dispersion of pumice particles into the ABS matrix when adding low amounts, as well as reduction in dispersion homogeneity with high amounts, of AP and BP was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Basic Sciences, Bartın University, Bartın, Türkiye.
Department of Chemical Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Department of Textile Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Welding Technology and Non-destructive Testing Research and Application Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Department of Biotechnology, Bartın University, Bartın, Türkiye.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Harris T. Functional Fillers for Plastics. Intertech Corp: Atlanta; 2003.
2. Mascia L. The Role of Additives in Plastics. Edward Arnold: London; 1974.
3. Astrom BT. Manufacturing of Polymer Composites. Chapman: London;. 1997.
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11364010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113640 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.12.00410.1016/j.apradiso.2006.12.004 ↗
6. Elmastas N. A mine becoming increasingly important for economy of Turkey: Pumice. J Int Social Res, 2012; 5:197–206.
7. 10.1089/ast.2010.054610.1089/ast.2010.0546 ↗
8. 10.3208/sandf.46.6910.3208/sandf.46.69 ↗
9. 10.1080/19443994.2015.112434810.1080/19443994.2015.1124348 ↗
10. Erdogan Y, , Yasari E, , Ranjith GP. Obtaining lightweight concrete using colemanite waste and acidic pumice. Physicochem Probl Miner Process, 2016; 52:35–43.
11. Oz HO, , Yucel HE, , Gunes M. Freeze-thaw resistance of self compacting concrete incorporating basic pumice. Int J Theor Appl Mech, 2016; 1:285–291.
12. 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00123-210.1016/S0141-0296(02)00123-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.psep.2007.10.01010.1016/j.psep.2007.10.010 ↗
14. Dayan O, , Kilic A, , Bulut A, et al. Pumice-supported ruthenium nanoparticles as highly effective and recyclable catalyst in the hydrolysis of methylamine borane. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022. [Epub ahead of print]; doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.116
15. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12345310.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123453 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.10988110.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109881 ↗
17. 10.1177/089270571878569210.1177/0892705718785692 ↗
18. Kanbur Y, , Tayfun U. Mechanical, physical and morphological properties of acidic and basic pumice containing polypropylene composites. Sakarya Univ J Sci, 2018; 22:333–339.
19. 10.1016/j.mseb.2006.04.04010.1016/j.mseb.2006.04.040 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.01710.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.017 ↗
21. 10.1177/002199831036957510.1177/0021998310369575 ↗
22. Koyuncu M. The influence of pumice dust on tensile, stiffness properties and flame retardant of epoxy/wood flour composites. J Trop For Sci, 2018; 30:89–94.
23. 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.11.01510.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.11.015 ↗
24. 10.35414/akufemubid.61899310.35414/akufemubid.618993 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2007.04.03010.1016/j.cej.2007.04.030 ↗
26. Soyaslan II. Thermal and sound insulation properties of pumice/polyurethane composite material. Emerg Mater Res, 2020; 9:859–867.
27. 10.1007/s10973-016-5507-610.1007/s10973-016-5507-6 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2389910.1002/pc.23899 ↗
29. Jayakrishnan P, , Ramesan MT. Synthesis, characterization and properties of poly (vinyl alcohol)/chemically modified and unmodified pumice composites. J Chem Pharm Sci, 2016; 1:97–104.
30. Alvarado S, , Morales K, , Srubar W, et al. Effects of natural porous additives on the tensile mechanical performance and moisture absorption behavior of PHBV-based composites for construction. Stanford Undergrad Res J, 2011; 10:30–35.
31. 10.12693/APhysPolA.125.51810.12693/APhysPolA.125.518 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2351310.1002/pc.23513 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2081510.1002/pc.20815 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0032-3861(05)80009-610.1016/S0032-3861(05)80009-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.07410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.074 ↗
36. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00457.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00457.x ↗
37. 10.1007/s12206-014-1205-010.1007/s12206-014-1205-0 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00189-X10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00189-X ↗
39. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<423::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<423::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
40. 10.1007/s40964-020-00142-610.1007/s40964-020-00142-6 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.11.002 ↗
42. 10.1089/3dp.2016.005710.1089/3dp.2016.0057 ↗
43. 10.1089/3dp.2017.006710.1089/3dp.2017.0067 ↗
44. Paganin LC, , Barbosa G. Kress C. A comparative experimental study of additive manufacturing feasibility faced to injection molding process for polymeric parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020; 109(9):2663–2677.
45. 10.1007/s00170-016-8968-710.1007/s00170-016-8968-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10734110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341 ↗
47. 10.1111/iar.1244110.1111/iar.12441 ↗
48. 10.1007/s12040-010-0054-110.1007/s12040-010-0054-1 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00464-210.1016/S0012-821X(01)00464-2 ↗
50. 10.1007/s00445005018410.1007/s004450050184 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11083810.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110838 ↗
52. 10.1177/073168440935921610.1177/0731684409359216 ↗
53. 10.1021/am301144z10.1021/am301144z ↗
54. Bouzmane H, , Tirkeş S, , Yılmaz VM, et al. Contribution of surface silanization process on mechanical characteristics of TPU-based composites involving feldspar and quartz minerals. J Vinyl Addit Technol, 2022. [Epub ahead of print]; doi: 10.1002/vnl.21947
55. Çoban O, , Yilmaz T. Volcanic particle materials in polymer composites: A review. J Mater Sci, 2022. [Epub ahead of print]; doi: 10.1007/s10853-022-07664-010.1007/s10853-022-07664-0 ↗
56. 10.1080/03602559.2011.65124210.1080/03602559.2011.651242 ↗
57. 10.1007/s42823-022-00332-y10.1007/s42823-022-00332-y ↗
58. 10.1007/s10853-008-2483-710.1007/s10853-008-2483-7 ↗
59. Ehrenstein GW Riedel G Trawiel P. Thermal Analysis of Plastics: Theory and Practice. Hanser Gardner Publications: Munich; 2004.10.3139/9783446434141 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10973-018-7550-y10.1007/s10973-018-7550-y ↗
61. Menard KP. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis: A Practical Introduction. CRC Press: Florida; 2008.10.1201/9781420053135 ↗
62. 10.1039/C5RA25561A10.1039/C5RA25561A ↗
63. 10.1007/s10973-021-10656-y10.1007/s10973-021-10656-y ↗
64. Compton BG, , Post BK, , Duty CE, et al. Thermal analysis of additive manufacturing of large-scale thermoplastic polymer composites. Addit Manuf, 2017; 17:77–86.
65. 10.1007/s10973-006-7781-110.1007/s10973-006-7781-1 ↗
66. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab4ddd10.1088/2053-1591/ab4ddd ↗
67. 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00045-910.1016/S0141-3910(02)00045-9 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.172213410.1063/1.1722134 ↗
69. 10.1021/am300599410.1021/am3005994 ↗
70. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00956-110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00956-1 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.004 ↗
72. 10.37256/gbce.11202059110.37256/gbce.112020591 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.02.01510.1016/j.jobe.2016.02.015 ↗