journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Effect of the Material Extrusion Process Parameters on the Compressive Properties of Additively Manufactured Foamed and Nonfoamed Polylactic Acid Structures

Armin Yousefi Kanani, Andrew Kennedy

Abstract

This work evaluates the potential for foamable polymer filaments to be used to make lightweight, energy-absorbing structures using additive manufacturing. To achieve this, a commercial, foamable polylactic acid filament was extruded using a material extrusion process to make parts for compression testing. It was found that a maximum foam expansion could be achieved at an extrusion nozzle temperature of 220°C, but that to achieve dimensional accuracy, the material flow rate through the nozzle had to be adjusted by decreasing the extrusion multiplier value. In a novel approach, accurate and faster builds could be achieved by decreasing the infill instead. When compared with porous structures achieved by using partial infilling instead or as well as foaming, all materials were found to follow the same power-law function of the solid fraction. These trends indicated that the mechanical response was, within experimental scatter, a function of the overall solid fraction and not influenced by whether the porosity was within or between the raster lines. Although there was no apparent benefit to the mechanical performance in introducing porosity into a polymer by foaming, foamable filaments are desirable if stiff, lightweight structures with low fractions of interconnected porosity are required and can be used in combination with infilling to produce low-density structures that would be highly suitable for cores in novel lightweight sandwich structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Group, School of Engineering, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.

School of Engineering, Engineering Building, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.11002910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110029 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.11.01310.1016/j.supflu.2017.11.013 ↗
3. 10.3390/polym1106095310.3390/polym11060953 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1110184110.3390/ma11101841 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.00410.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.004 ↗
6. 10.1007/b13624410.1007/b136244 ↗
7. Wypych G. Handbook of Foaming and Blowing Agents. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing 2017.
8. 10.1177/0307174X160430050110.1177/0307174X1604300501 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.05210.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.052 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11837-017-2734-710.1007/s11837-017-2734-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.12.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.12.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.029 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11069310.1016/j.msec.2020.110693 ↗
15. 10.3390/mi1208086610.3390/mi12080866 ↗
16. RichRap3D. ColorFabb LW-PLA Expanding Foaming Plastic Filament for 3D Printing—Part 1 Testing and Experimentation. 2019. Available from: https://richrap.blogspot.com/2019/04/colorfabb-lw-pla-expanding-foaming.html [Last accessed: October3 2021].
17. Hermann S. Colorfabb LW-PLA Testing Foaming PLA. 2020. Available from: https://www.cnckitchen.com/blog/colorfabb-lw-pla-testing-foaming-pla [Last accessed: October3 2021].
18. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.10810.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.1344810.1002/app.13448 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10665610.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106656 ↗
21. Torre R, , Brischetto S, , Dipietro IR. Buckling developed in 3D printed PLA cuboidal samples under compression: Analytical, numerical and experimental investigations. Addit Manuf, 2021; 38:101790; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101790.
22. Gradinaru S, , Tabaras D, , Gheorghe D, et al. Analysis of the anisotropy for 3D printed PLA parts usable in medicine. UPB Sci Bull Ser B Chem Mater Sci, 2019; 81(4):313–324.
23. 10.1177/089270571984724410.1177/0892705719847244 ↗
24. 10.1108/RPJ-06-2019-015110.1108/RPJ-06-2019-0151 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00087-010.1016/S0734-743X(97)00087-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.11.002 ↗
28. 10.1080/03602559.2018.154273010.1080/03602559.2018.1542730 ↗
29. Vatsh P Sahu K. Comparison of most suitable 3D printing materials failure testing of PLA and ABS and experimental testing of PLA by instron machine. 2017;5(7):760–765. Available from: https://ijsrd.com/Article.php?manuscript=IJSRDV5I70406
30. Ashby MF. Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. Elsevier; 2011.; doi: 10.1016/C2009-0-25539-5.10.1016/B978-1-85617-663-7.00005-9 ↗
31. Upadhyay K Dwivedi R Singh AK. Determination and comparison of the anisotropic strengths of fused deposition modeling P400 ABS. In: Zehnder A ed. Advances in 3D Printing & Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer Singapore: Singapore; 2017; pp. 9–28.10.1007/978-981-10-0812-2_2 ↗
32. 10.3390/polym1209205910.3390/polym12092059 ↗
33. 10.1515/eng-2020-008310.1515/eng-2020-0083 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y ↗