Assessment of Additive Manufacturing for Increasing Sustainability and Productivity of Smallholder Agriculture
Source abstract
Abstract
The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) seeks to increase both the sustainability and the productivity of smallholder rice farms, but the adoption of this methodology is constrained by local access to appropriate mechanical equipment. Valuable information about real difficulties in the adoption of SRI was collected through communications with five field partners. Two primary mechanization obstacles were identified, that is, the availability and performance of a roller component on a push seeder and a rotor component on a push weeder. The potential of additive manufacturing (AM), and especially material extrusion three-dimensional (3D) printing (ME3DP), to assist in overcoming the identified obstacles was assessed for two cases while considering both local prototyping and low-volume production. A simplified cost model was used to compare with the cost of manufacturing both in the United States and locally in the field. The acquired data suggests that in specific cases current ME3DP technology can more rapidly provide functional parts, accelerating the design cycle and lowering cost by about a factor of 10 relative to local fabrication routes. In the case where mechanical performance is critical and dimensional precision and surface finish are not, wire arc metal AM appears promising, but it is not as economical as fabrication by traditional means in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cornell Fracture Group, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00070-110.1016/S0308-521X(01)00070-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.00310.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.003 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00271-006-0038-810.1007/s00271-006-0038-8 ↗
4. 10.56093/ijas.v82i3.1597910.56093/ijas.v82i3.15979 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10333-010-0223-510.1007/s10333-010-0223-5 ↗
6. 10.1186/2048-7010-3-410.1186/2048-7010-3-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.00910.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.009 ↗
8. Mueller B. Additive manufacturing technologies—Rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Assembly Autom, 2012; 32.
9. Thomas DS, , Gilbert SW. Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing. NIST Spec Publ, 2014; 1176:12.
10. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
11. 10.1016/j.phpro.2017.08.00910.1016/j.phpro.2017.08.009 ↗
12. 10.5402/2012/20876010.5402/2012/208760 ↗
13. 10.12924/of2015.0101001910.12924/of2015.01010019 ↗
14. Ishengoma FR, , Mtaho AB. 3D printing: Developing countries perspectives. Int J Comput Appl, 2014; 104:30–34.
15. Birtchnell T Hoyle W. 3D Printing for Development in the Global South: The 3D4D Challenge. London United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan 2014.10.1057/9781137365668_2 ↗
16. 10.1243/09544060376255459610.1243/095440603762554596 ↗
17. 10.1243/09544054JEM51710.1243/09544054JEM517 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00170-011-3878-110.1007/s00170-011-3878-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.00210.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.04.00610.1016/j.addma.2016.04.006 ↗
21. Costabile G, , Fera M, , Fruggiero F, et al. Cost models of additive manufacturing: A literature review. Int J Ind Eng Comput, 2017; 8:263–283.
22. 10.1300/J064v30n04_0310.1300/J064v30n04_03 ↗
23. 3Ders. Price compare—3D printers. Available at: http://www.3ders.org Accessed September6 2019.
24. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer costs for employee compensation. 2018. USDL-19-1002. Available at: www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_09182018.pdf Accessed April10 2019.
25. New York Department of Labor. Minimum wage order for miscellaneous industries and occupations. 2016. 12 NYCRR 142. Available at: labor.ny.gov/formsdocs/wp/CR142.pdf Accessed April10 2019.
26. Salmi M, , Ituarte IF, , Chekurov S, et al. Effect of build orientation in 3D printing production for material extrusion, material jetting, binder jetting, sheet object lamination, vat photopolymerisation, and powder bed fusion. Int J Collab Enterp, 2016; 5:218–231.
27. Park S, , Rosen DW. Quantifying effects of material extrusion additive manufacturing process on mechanical properties of lattice structures using as-fabricated voxel modeling. Addit Manuf, 2016; 12:265–273.
28. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10123010.1016/j.addma.2020.101230 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10535810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105358 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10536310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105363 ↗
32. 10.1109/ACCESS.2013.229301810.1109/ACCESS.2013.2293018 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.03810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.038 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00867-110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00867-1 ↗
35. 10.1089/3dp.2014.001510.1089/3dp.2014.0015 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00170-015-7077-310.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 ↗
37. 10.1179/1743284715Y.000000007310.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.01910.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00170-017-0636-z10.1007/s00170-017-0636-z ↗
40. Zhong Li J, , Alkahari MR, , Rosli NAB, et al. Ramli. Review of wire arc additive manufacturing for 3D metal printing. Int J Autom Technol, 2019; 13:346–353.
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.009 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00170-003-1694-y10.1007/s00170-003-1694-y ↗
43. 10.1504/IJMATEI.2012.04925410.1504/IJMATEI.2012.049254 ↗
44. 10.3791/51745-v10.3791/51745-v ↗