Toward Stimuli-Responsive Soft Robots with 3D Printed Self-Healing Konjac Glucomannan Gels
Source abstract
Abstract
Significant progress in fabricating new multifunctional soft materials and the advances of additive manufacturing technologies have given birth to a new generation of soft robots with complex capabilities, such as crawling, swimming, jumping, gripping, and releasing. Within this vast array of responsive soft materials, hydrogels receive considerable attention due to their fascinating properties, including biodegradable, self-healing, stimuli-responsive, and large volume transformation. Konjac glucomannan (KGM) is an edible polysaccharide that forms a pH-responsive, self-healing hydrogel when crosslinked with borax, and it is the focus of this study. A novel KGM-Borax ink for three-dimensional (3D) printing of free-form structures and soft robots at room temperature is presented. A complete process from ink preparation to the fabrication of a completely cross-linked part is demonstrated. Print setting parameters, rheological properties of the ink and crosslinked gels were characterized. Print quality was found to be consistent across a wide range of print settings. The minimum line width achieved is 650 μm. Tensile testing was carried out to validate the self-healing capability of the KGM-Borax gel. Results show that KGM-Borax has a high self-healing efficiency of 98%. Self-healing underwater was also demonstrated, a rarity for crosslinked gels. The means to form complex structures via 3D printing, reacting to environmental stimuli and the resilience against damage, make this new KGM-Borax gel a promising candidate for the fabrication of the next generation of soft robots.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.eml.2018.05.00310.1016/j.eml.2018.05.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.10025810.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100258 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.00610.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 ↗
5. 10.1039/b714376a10.1039/b714376a ↗
6. Chambers LD Winfield J Ieropoulos I et al. Biodegradable and Edible Gelatine Actuators for Use as Artificial Muscles. EAPAD. March 2014. San Diego CA. Bellingham WA: SPIE 2014.10.1117/12.2045104 ↗
7. Shintake J Sonar H Piskarev E et al. Soft pneumatic gelatin actuator for edible robotics. 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)Vancouver BC. New York NY: IEEE 2017; pp. 6221–6226.10.1109/IROS.2017.8206525 ↗
8. 10.1002/pi.237810.1002/pi.2378 ↗
9. Dumitriu S. Polysaccharides as biomaterials. In: Dumitriu S (ed). Polymeric Biomaterials. New York NY: Marcel Dekker; 2001; pp. 1–11.10.1201/9780203904671.pt1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.03410.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.034 ↗
11. 10.3390/polym909040110.3390/polym9090401 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.01910.1016/j.addr.2009.07.019 ↗
13. Ahmadi F, , Oveisi Z, , Samani S M, et al. Chitosan based hydrogels: Characteristics and pharmaceutical applications. Res Pharm Sci, 2015; 10:1–16.
14. Maeda M, , Shimahara H, , Sugiyama N. Detailed examination of the branched structure of konjac glucomannan. Agr Biol Chem, 1980; 44:245–252.
15. Kato K, , Matsuda K. Studies on the chemical structure of konjac mannan: Part I. Isolation and characterization of oligosaccharides from the partial acid hydrolyzate of the mannan. Agr Biol Chem, 1969; 33:1446–1453.
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.00310.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.003 ↗
17. 10.1080/00021369.1974.1086116110.1080/00021369.1974.10861161 ↗
18. 10.1021/bm005525y10.1021/bm005525y ↗
19. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.12.01510.1016/j.foodres.2011.12.015 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.08.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2007.08.015 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10965-019-1702-z10.1007/s10965-019-1702-z ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.00710.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.007 ↗
23. 10.1002/admi.20180005110.1002/admi.201800051 ↗
24. Terryn S, , Brancart J, , Lefeber D, et al. Self-healing soft pneumatic robots. Sci Robot, 2017; 2.
25. Roels E, , Terryn S, , Brancart J, et al. Additive manufacturing for self-healing soft robots. Soft Robot, 2020; 76 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI:10.1089/soro.2019.0081.
26. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.12910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.129 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0005310.1021/acs.macromol.9b00053 ↗
28. 10.1039/C4TB01653J10.1039/C4TB01653J ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.03210.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.032 ↗
30. 10.1089/soro.2013.000710.1089/soro.2013.0007 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41578-018-0002-210.1038/s41578-018-0002-2 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7BM00765E10.1039/C7BM00765E ↗
33. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/02501610.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025016 ↗
34. Yulong W, , Lu H, , Jia Y, et al. 3D Bioprintability of konjac glucomannan hydrogel. Mater Sci, 2020; 26:109–113.
35. 10.1002/ad.171010.1002/ad.1710 ↗
36. López-Díaz A Martín-Pacheco A Naranjo A et al. Autonomous self-healing pneumatic McKibben muscle based on a new hydrogel material. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics. May 2020. New Haven CT. New York: IEEE 2020; pp. 13–18.10.1109/RoboSoft48309.2020.9115992 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bprint.2017.09.00110.1016/j.bprint.2017.09.001 ↗
38. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0227910.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02279 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10924-018-1260-110.1007/s10924-018-1260-1 ↗
40. 10.1271/bbb.56.118810.1271/bbb.56.1188 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0017010.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00170 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20200237410.1002/adfm.202002374 ↗
43. Narumi K Qin F Liu S et al. Self-healing UI: Mechanically and Electrically Self-healing Materials for Sensing and Actuation Interfaces. 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. October 2019. New Orleans LA. New York NY: ACM 2019; pp. 293–306.10.1145/3332165.3347901 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0276366710.1007/BF02763667 ↗