In-Process Thread Orientation Monitoring in Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Additive manufacturing/3D printing (AM/3DP) has become a practical manufacturing modality in fabricating highly-complex/optimized parts, providing a form-free flexibility for the development of high-value/high-performance products. However, significant build-to-build variabilities in geometric tolerances and mechanical strength have often been reported as shortcomings. Currently, AM/3DP lacks a practical in situ /real-time quality monitoring utility. In fused filament fabrication, the quality of production in a uniform build depends on two fundamental parameters: the strength of each thread (an extruded line of filament material, created by the heated nozzle) and the nature/strength of thread-to-thread bonds in (in-plate) horizontal and (out-of-plane) vertical directions. In this study, we present an in situ /real-time monitoring approach, in which, instead of monitoring the actual build, the spectral characteristics of elastic wave propagation in a specially designed artifact having periodic internal structures are monitored. The design of an artifact is based on the geometric complexities of the actual build, and its internal structures amplify certain specified aspects of its AM/3DP process and materials. Furthermore, the artifact is substantially simpler and smaller than the actual build it represents, thus considerably easier to monitor. In this study, the artifact design consists of repeating biperiodic substructures of sparsely located threads. As a model problem, in this study we introduce and report a simple phononic crystal artifact design with varying thread-crossing angles and the effects of thread orientation and placement on the shifts of its pass and stop bands and/or the creation of stop bands. In current proof-of-concept study, an experimental setup and basic artifact designs are described, off-line monitoring data are presented, and the sensitivity of the approach is analyzed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Photo-Acoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York.
Incodema3D, LLC, Additive Technologies and Innovation, Freeville, New York.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Mani M Feng S Lane B et al. Measurement Science Needs for Real-Time Control of Additive Manufacturing Powder Bed Fusion Processes. Gaithersburg MD: U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology 2015.10.6028/NIST.IR.8036 ↗
2. Moylan S, , Slotwinski J, , Cooke A, et al. Proposal for a standardized test artifact for additive manufacturing machines and processes. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 2012, pp. 6–8.
3. 10.1115/1.402982310.1115/1.4029823 ↗
4. Slotwinski JA. Additive manufacturing: Overview and NDE challenges. In: AIP Conference Proceedings AIP Baltimore MD 2014 pp. 1173–1177.10.1063/1.4864953 ↗
5. Pedersen DB. Additive manufacturing: Multi material processing and part quality control [PhD thesis]. Technical University of Denmark 2013.
6. Kleszczynski S, , Zur Jacobsmühlen J, , Sehrt JT, et al. Error detection in laser beam melting systems by high resolution imaging. In: Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 2012.
7. Rodriguez E, , Medina F, , Espalin D, et al. Integration of a thermal imaging feedback control system in electron beam melting. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 2012.
8. 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.09710.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.097 ↗
9. 10.1115/IMECE2014-3666110.1115/IMECE2014-36661 ↗
10. Branner G, , Zaeh MF, , Groth C. Coupled-field simulation in additive layer manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Polymers and Moulds Innovations, Ghent, Belgium, 2008, pp. 184–193.
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.182810.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.1828 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.491460910.1063/1.4914609 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.494060510.1063/1.4940605 ↗
14. Nadimpalli VK, , Na JK, , Bruner DT, et al. In-situ non-destructive evaluation of ultrasonic additive manufactured components. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication: 27th Annual International, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference (TOC), Austin, TX, 2016, pp. 8–10.
15. Rieder H, , Spies M, , Bamberg J, et al. On-and offline ultrasonic inspection of additively manufactured components. In: 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (WCNDT), Munich, Germany, 2016, pp. 13–17.
16. Krautkrämer J, , Krautkrämer H. Ultrasonic Testing of Materials. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
17. Gibson I Rosen D Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing Rapid Prototyping and Direct Digital Manufacturing. New York NY: Springer 2014.10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.09910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
19. 10.1006/jsvi.1998.197110.1006/jsvi.1998.1971 ↗
20. 10.1006/jsvi.1996.036510.1006/jsvi.1996.0365 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.403690810.1115/1.4036908 ↗
22. 10.1006/jsvi.1994.019710.1006/jsvi.1994.0197 ↗
23. 10.1006/jsvi.1994.115610.1006/jsvi.1994.1156 ↗