Quantifying Manufacturability Complexity Index: A Case Study of VAT Photopolymerization Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, has played a significant role in the success of Industry 4.0 by enabling rapid prototyping, tooling, and production. AM uses a layer-by-layer building process from CAD models, providing greater design flexibility for creating intricate and customized components. However, there is a prevailing misconception that design complexity comes at no additional cost for AM. This notion is challenged, especially when AM intricate components with complex external surfaces can lead to longer build times and increased costs. This article introduces a method for quantifying design complexity in additively manufactured parts using a mixed-methods approach. This approach leverages qualitative and quantitative data to assess the additive manufacturing complexity index (AMCI) of parts. The AMCI is a metric developed to measure and evaluate the complexity of parts produced using AM processes, considering factors such as geometry, features, AM machine settings, and parameter requirements. The technique aims to assist manufacturers and designers in early-stage part development by quantifying the difficulty of building parts using VAT photopolymerization (VPP) AM technology, enabling informed decision making. The article also discusses the concept of design complexity in AM. In addition, the article presents case studies and data analysis to test the proposed method. The analysis reveals that various factors such as geometry, features, AM machine settings, and parameter requirements can impact the manufacturability of parts in VPP AM processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marwadi University, Rajkot, India.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/app1116774310.3390/app11167743 ↗
2. 10.3390/designs402001310.3390/designs4020013 ↗
3. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822056-6.00003-510.1016/B978-0-12-822056-6.00003-5 ↗
4. 10.3390/app1103121310.3390/app11031213 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.01510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.015 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.10.02410.1016/j.jmapro.2023.10.024 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.10001410.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100014 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1520709010.3390/ma15207090 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1604147110.3390/ma16041471 ↗
10. 10.1080/17452759.2019.170925510.1080/17452759.2019.1709255 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-3-031-33793-210.1007/978-3-031-33793-2 ↗
12. 10.1243/09544060376255458710.1243/095440603762554587 ↗
13. 10.1108/aa.2012.03332baa.01010.1108/aa.2012.03332baa.010 ↗
14. Pradel P Bibb R Zhu Z et al. Complexity Is Not For Free: The Impact of Component Complexity on Additive Manufacturing Build Time. n.d.
15. 10.1080/16864360.2015.111439310.1080/16864360.2015.1114393 ↗
16. 10.26153/tsw/1700310.26153/tsw/17003 ↗
17. 10.1299/jamdsm.2019jamdsm007010.1299/jamdsm.2019jamdsm0070 ↗
18. 10.3390/met905057410.3390/met9050574 ↗
19. Amor SB Tahan A Louhichi B. Proposition of a geometric complexity model for additive manufacturing process based on CAD. In: 2019 23rd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV). 2019; pp. 442–448; 10.1109/IV.2019.0008010.1109/IV.2019.00080 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-020-06158-010.1007/s00170-020-06158-0 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_2710.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_27 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40964-024-00583-310.1007/s40964-024-00583-3 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10845-023-02122-310.1007/s10845-023-02122-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cad.2013.04.00310.1016/j.cad.2013.04.003 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00170-022-09948-w10.1007/s00170-022-09948-w ↗
26. 10.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_310.1007/978-3-319-66866-6_3 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1512271610.3390/polym15122716 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.addlet.2024.10019310.1016/j.addlet.2024.100193 ↗
29. 10.3390/jmmp601001710.3390/jmmp6010017 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-3-030-32040-9_7010.1007/978-3-030-32040-9_70 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10192210.1016/j.addma.2021.101922 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.10363010.1016/j.jdent.2021.103630 ↗
33. 10.3390/bioengineering1007078210.3390/bioengineering10070782 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10576010.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105760 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10364110.1016/j.addma.2023.103641 ↗
36. 10.1080/00224065.2021.192637710.1080/00224065.2021.1926377 ↗
37. 10.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_7110.1007/978-981-16-0119-4_71 ↗
38. 10.1177/0954405422113652410.1177/09544054221136524 ↗
39. 10.3390/designs403001910.3390/designs4030019 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00170-020-05898-310.1007/s00170-020-05898-3 ↗
41. 10.1007/978-3-030-86446-0_2710.1007/978-3-030-86446-0_27 ↗
42. 10.1007/s12008-023-01426-110.1007/s12008-023-01426-1 ↗
43. Valentan B Brajlih T Drstvenšek I et al. Evaluation of Shape Complexity Based on STL Data. 2006.
44. 10.1111/jiec.1239710.1111/jiec.12397 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00510.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005 ↗
46. 10.1142/S021968672350016610.1142/S0219686723500166 ↗
47. Diegel O, , Nordin A, , Motte D. A Practical Guide to Design for Additive Manufacturing. In: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer: Singapore; 2019.
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.12.00910.1016/j.matdes.2018.12.009 ↗