journal article·2024-04-01Open access

Durability of Vacuum Infusion Tooling Produced from Fused Granular Fabrication Additive Manufacturing

Nathan Northrup, Jason M. Weaver, Andrew R. George

Abstract

Fused Granular Fabrication Additive Manufacturing (FGF AM) has the capability to create tooling that is lower cost than conventionally manufactured tooling and still has sufficient properties for many applications. A vacuum infusion (VI) mold was printed from fiberglass-acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and evaluated for wear and suitability for small VI runs. The mold was designed to accentuate high wear as a “worst case” scenario. The mold was able to produce 10 parts successfully before any noticeable change occurred to the surface finish. By 14 parts, the surface finish had roughened sufficiently that demolding was difficult and resulted in damage to the part. Profilometry measurements showed a 7 × increase in roughness over the run. No significant tool wear or change in geometry was detected. Even longer life would be expected for typical tooling designs since the test mold was deliberately designed to accentuate wear and demolding issues. Based on these results, similar FGF molds are a feasible option for short run VI production for prototyping or low-volume composites manufacturing, possibly at lower cost and quicker turnaround time than machined aluminum molds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Jones J. AMBIT PE-1 Polymer Extrusion Specification Sheet. McKinney Texas: Hybrid Manufacturing Technologies 2018.
2. Roschli A, , Gaul KT, , Boulger AM, et al. Designing for big area additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2019; 25:275–285.
3. Weaver J Jones J. Characterization of High-Deposition Polymer Extrusion in Hybrid Manufacturing. Austin Texas: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium University of Texas at Austin 2018.
4. Duty CE Drye T Franc A. Material Development for Tooling Applications Using Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM). Oak Ridge Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 2015.10.2172/1209207 ↗
5. Bogdanor M Agrawal H Barocio E et al. Design of Composite Compression Molding Tools Using Large Scale Additive Manufacturing. International SAMPE Technical Conference. Seattle Washington: SAMPE 2020.
6. 10.1557/jmr.2014.21210.1557/jmr.2014.212 ↗
7. Kunc V, , Hassen AA, , Lindahl J, et al. Large scale additively manufactured tooling for composites. Japan International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition. Tokyo, Japan: SAMPE, 2017.
8. 10.1007/s00170-016-9464-910.1007/s00170-016-9464-9 ↗
9. Hassen AA, , Springfield R, , Lindahl J, et al. The durability of large-scale additive manufacturing composite molds. CAMX, 2016; 2016:26–29.
10. 10.1080/17452759.2018.153279810.1080/17452759.2018.1532798 ↗
11. Hassen AA Lindahl J Chen X et al. Additive manufacturing of composite tooling using high temperature thermoplastic materials. SAMPE Conference Proceedings Long Beach California: SAMPE 2016.
12. Kunc V Lindahl J Dinwiddie R et al. Investigation of in-autoclave additive manufacturing composite tooling. CAMX Conference ACMA Annaheim California 2016.
13. Strong AB. Fundamentals of Composites Manufacturing: Materials Methods and Applications. Southfield Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers 2008.
14. 10.1002/pc.1016210.1002/pc.10162 ↗
15. Yeole PS. Thermoplastic Additive Manufacturing for Composites and Molds. Knoxville Tennessee: Doctoral Dissertation University of Tennessee 2020.
16. 10.1002/pc.2596210.1002/pc.25962 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10207210.1016/j.addma.2021.102072 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12753610.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127536 ↗
19. Wang PH, , Kim G, , Sterkenburg R. Investigating the effectiveness of a 3D printed composite mold. Int J Aerosp Mech Eng, 2019; 13:684–688.
20. Karmarkar S. Extrusion Deposition Additive Manufacturing for High Temperature Tooling. West Lafayette Indiana: Doctoral Dissertation Purdue University 2018.
21. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-018310.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0183 ↗
22. Mark JE. Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook. New York City New York: Springer 2007.10.1007/978-0-387-69002-5 ↗
23. Jones J. AMBIT FS1202 Glass Reinforced ABS Material Properties. McKinney Texas: Hybrid Manufacturing Technologies 2022.
24. Hexagon Metrology. ROMER Absolute Arm Factsheet. Stockholm Sweden: Hexagon AB 2022.
25. 10.3103/S1068798X1706005310.3103/S1068798X17060053 ↗
26. Northrup NJ. Durability of Hybrid Large Area Additive Tooling for Vacuum Infusion of Composites. Master's thesis Brigham Young University Provo Utah 2019.
27. Xometry. Manufacturing on Demand. 2022. Available from: https://www.xometry.com (last accessed August10 2022).