journal article·2022-10-01Open access

Structural Analysis of Voxel-Based Lattices Using 1D Approach

Antonio Bacciaglia, Alessandro Ceruti, Alfredo Liverani

Abstract

Lightweight bioinspired structures are extremely interesting in industrial applications for their known advantages, especially when Additive Manufacturing technologies are used. Lattices are composed of axial elements called ligaments: several unit cells are repeated in three directions to form bodies. However, their inherent structure complexity leads to several problems when lattices need to be designed or numerically simulated. The computational power needed to capture the overall component is extremely high. For this reason, some alternative methodologies called homogenization methods were developed in the literature. However, following these approaches, the designers do not have a local visual overview of the lattice behavior, especially at the ligament level. For this reason, an alternative mono-dimensional (1D) modeling approach, called lattice-to-1D is proposed in this work. This method approximates the ligament element with its beam axis, uses the real material characteristics, and gives the cross-sectional information directly to the solver. Several linear elastic simulations, involving both stretching and bending dominated unit cells, are performed to compare this approach with other alternatives in the literature. The results show a comparable agreement of the 1D simulations compared with homogenization methods for real tridimensional (3D) objects, with a dramatic decrease of computational power needed for a 3D analysis of the whole body.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Gibson I Rosen D. Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. New York: Springer 2015.10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_7610.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_76 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
4. 10.1108/RPJ-07-2019-018710.1108/RPJ-07-2019-0187 ↗
5. 10.1051/meca/201905810.1051/meca/2019058 ↗
6. 10.1089/3dp.2019.011910.1089/3dp.2019.0119 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.01310.1016/j.msea.2016.06.013 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.12710.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.127 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.14610.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.146 ↗
10. Llorente S. Honeycomb sandwich primary structure applications on the Boeing model 360 helicopter. In: International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition. SAMPE, Covina, CA, 1989, 34; pp.824–838.
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.827.11610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.827.116 ↗
12. 10.1108/RPJ-01-2016-001410.1108/RPJ-01-2016-0014 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.04.00210.1016/j.msea.2008.04.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.017 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.01610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.10.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.10.003 ↗
17. Gibson LJ Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 2001.
18. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.10.00810.1016/j.jmps.2005.10.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00006-410.1016/S0022-5096(98)00006-4 ↗
20. Craster RV, , Kaplunov J, , Pichugin AV. High-frequency homogenization for periodic media. Proc R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci, 2010; 466:2341–2362.
21. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.06.01110.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.06.011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.10.02110.1016/j.compstruc.2003.10.021 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.309083010.1115/1.3090830 ↗
24. Guinovart-Díaz R, , Bravo-Castillero J, , Rodriguez-Ramos R, et al. Modeling of elastic transversely isotropic composite using the asymptotic homogenization method. Some comparisons with other models. Mater Lett, 2002; 56:889–894.
25. Bendsøe MP Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory Methods and Applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer 2011.
26. 10.1016/j.cma.2012.03.01810.1016/j.cma.2012.03.018 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.404055510.1115/1.4040555 ↗
28. Pointer J. Understanding Accuracy and Discretization Error in an FEA Model. ANSYS 7.1 Conference Woodward Governor Company. 2004.
29. 10.1115/1.404013110.1115/1.4040131 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.04910.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.049 ↗
31. Renishaw. Ti6Al4V ELI-0406 powder for additive manufacturing datasheet. 2017.
32. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.01210.1016/j.addma.2017.06.012 ↗
33. Patil S Ravi B. Voxel-based representation display and thickness analysis of intricate shapes. In: Ninth International Conference on Computer Aided Design and Computer Graphics (CAD-CG’05) Hong Kong China. 7–10 December 2005; pp.415–422.10.1109/CAD-CG.2005.86 ↗
34. Patran reference manual. The neutral file. 2018.
35. Ceruti A Ferrari R Liverani A. Design for additive manufacturing using LSWM: a CAD tool for the modelling of lightweight and lattice structures. In: Campana G. Howlett R. Setchi R. Cimatti B. (eds) Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2017. SDM 2017. Smart Innovation Systems and Technologies vol 68. Springer Cham Switzerland: Springer International Publishing 2017:68; pp.756–765.10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_71 ↗
36. nTopology. Element lattice design software. https://ntopology.com/blog/2016/04/19/element-free (accessed October10 2020).
37. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.006 ↗
38. Asaro R Lubarda V. Mechanics of Solids and Materials. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 2006.10.1017/CBO9780511755514 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.03.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2013.03.003 ↗
40. Timoshenko SP. History of Strength of Materials. New York NY: McGraw-Hill Inc. 1953.
41. Rotondella V, , Merulla A, , Baldini A, et al. Dynamic modal correlation of an automotive rear subframe, with particular reference to the modelling of welded joints. Adv Acoust Vib, 2017; 2017:1–9.
42. GrabCAD Community. GE jet engine bracket challenge. https://grabcad.com/challenges/ge-jet-engine-bracket-challenge (last accessed October2 2020).
43. Cook RD. Finite Element Modeling for Stress Analysis. Wiley USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 1995.