Augmented Design with Additive Manufacturing Methodology: Tangible Object-Based Method to Enhance Creativity in Design for Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) brings new design potential compared with traditional manufacturing. Nevertheless, traditional manufacturing knowledge remains embedded in the minds of designers and is a real cognitive barrier to design in AM. Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) provides tools, techniques, and guidelines to optimize design with the specifics of AM. These methods are usable at different moments of the design process. Only few DfAMs focus on the early stages of design, the ideation phase, which allows for the most innovation. The literature highlights the effectiveness of methodologies based on tangible tools, such as cards or objects, to generate creativity. The difficulty with such tools is to be inspirational as well as formative. Therefore, this article presents a method to help designers capture the design potential of AM to design creative solutions at the early stages of product design, named the Augmented Design with AM Methodology (ADAM2). This methodology relies on the potential of AM, defined in 14 opportunities and a set of 14 inspirational objects, each representing an opportunity. Dedicated to creativity sessions, this methodology allows forcing the association between knowledge of a company's sector and the design potential of AM. To validate the effectiveness of the ADAM2 methodology, we use it for an industrial application in a jewelry and watchmaking company. The results showed that ADAM2 promote the generation of creative solutions and the exploitation of the design potential of AM during the early design stages.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Augmented Reality Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LCPI, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, HESAM Université, Paris, France.
LaPEA, Université de Paris and Univ Gustave Eiffel, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
LINEACT, CESI, Nanterre, France.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Wohlers TT
2. 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.01110.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
3. Gibson I · 2014
4. 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.00410.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.404353110.1115/1.4043531 ↗
6. 10.1089/3dp.2013.000610.1089/3dp.2013.0006 ↗
7. Booth JW · J Mech Des · 2017 · 139
8. 10.1145/2897824.292587610.1145/2897824.2925876 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.404105110.1115/1.4041051 ↗
10. 10.1080/17452759.2016.124020810.1080/17452759.2016.1240208 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.403158910.1115/1.4031589 ↗
12. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x ↗
13. 10.1007/s12008-017-0369-010.1007/s12008-017-0369-0 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12541-019-00253-310.1007/s12541-019-00253-3 ↗
15. Lang A · 2019
16. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00810.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00810.x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.00210.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.404192810.1115/1.4041928 ↗
19. 19. Rias A-L. Creativity through and for additive manufacturing: Proposal of a tooling methodology. PhD thesis. Paris: ENSAM, 2017.
20. 20. Schumacher F, Watschke H, Kuschmitz S, et al. Goal oriented provision of design principles for additive manufacturing to support conceptual design. In: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design. Delft, the Netherlands: Cambridge University Press, 2019; pp. 749–758.10.1017/dsi.2019.79 ↗
21. 21. Valjak F, Bojčetić N. Conception of design principles for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design. Cambridge University Press, 2019; pp. 689–698.10.1017/dsi.2019.73 ↗
22. 22. Watschke H, Bavendiek A-K, Giannakos A, et al. A methodical approach to support ideation for additive manufacturing in design education. In: DS 87-5 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), vol. 5: Design for X, Design to X, Vancouver, Canada: Cambridge University Press, August 21–25, 2017. 2017; pp. 041–050.
23. Laverne F · Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) · 2016 · 11 · 279
24. 10.1080/09544828.2018.148301110.1080/09544828.2018.1483011 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.402872510.1115/1.4028725 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.04310.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.043 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00170-015-6994-510.1007/s00170-015-6994-5 ↗
28. 10.1186/s12957-015-0723-210.1186/s12957-015-0723-2 ↗
29. 10.1080/0020754090347978610.1080/00207540903479786 ↗
30. 30. Livesu M, Ellero S, Martínez J, et al. From 3D models to 3D prints: An overview of the processing pipeline. In: Computer Graphics Forum. The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2017; pp. 537–564.10.1111/cgf.13147 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20160421110.1002/adma.201604211 ↗
32. 10.1002/jor.2307510.1002/jor.23075 ↗
33. 10.3390/mi1101004810.3390/mi11010048 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.00110.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
35. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.291968210.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919682 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.34710.1016/j.procir.2016.02.347 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.11610.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.116 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.02.01510.1016/j.foodqual.2018.02.015 ↗
39. 10.1115/1.403115610.1115/1.4031156 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cad.2018.06.00310.1016/j.cad.2018.06.003 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00158-016-1522-210.1007/s00158-016-1522-2 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00158-015-1274-410.1007/s00158-015-1274-4 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.15510.1016/j.procir.2014.03.155 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.00410.1016/j.addma.2018.02.004 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.01110.1016/j.procir.2017.02.011 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.00510.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.005 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.02110.1016/j.procir.2019.02.021 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cagd.2015.03.02010.1016/j.cagd.2015.03.020 ↗
49. Oh Y · Addit Manuf · 2018 · 22 · 230
50. Panesar A · Addit Manuf · 2017 · 16 · 98
51. 10.1089/3dp.2017.001410.1089/3dp.2017.0014 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.03210.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.032 ↗
53. 10.1108/0144515051062643310.1108/01445150510626433 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.09.01010.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.09.010 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cagd.2018.03.01510.1016/j.cagd.2018.03.015 ↗
56. 10.1371/journal.pone.018290210.1371/journal.pone.0182902 ↗
57. 10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.07480910.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.074809 ↗
58. 58. Ion A, Frohnhofen J, Wall L, et al. Metamaterial mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Proceedings of UIST' 16, Tokyo, Japan, 2016; pp. 529–539.10.1145/2984511.2984540 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.03710.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.037 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.00910.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.00610.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006 ↗
62. 10.1002/adfm.20150103510.1002/adfm.201501035 ↗
63. Onuike B · Addit Manuf · 2018 · 22 · 844
64. 10.1016/j.mser.2018.04.00110.1016/j.mser.2018.04.001 ↗
65. 65. Cruz V, Gaudron N. Open-ended objects: A tool for brainstorming. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 2010; pp. 85–88.10.1145/1858171.1858188 ↗
66. Mer S · The communicative for design, Europia Production, · 1995 · 21
67. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.59510.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595 ↗
68. Rhodes M. · The Phi Delta Kappan · 1961 · 42 · 305
69. Richards R. · Encyclop Creativ · 1999 · 1 · 733
70. 70. Cropley D, Cropley A. Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In: Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the muse. Kaufman JC, Baer JM. Psychol Press; 2005: pp. 187–204.
71. 10.1002/jocb.910.1002/jocb.9 ↗