journal article·2023-12-01Open access

Biobased Resin for Sustainable Stereolithography: 3D Printed Vegetable Oil Acrylate Reinforced with Ultra-Low Content of Nanocellulose for Fossil Resin Substitution

Anda Barkane, Maksims Jurinovs, Sabine Briede, Oskars Platnieks, Pavels Onufrijevs, Zane Zelca, Sergejs Gaidukovs

Abstract

The use of biobased materials in additive manufacturing is a promising long-term strategy for advancing the polymer industry toward a circular economy and reducing the environmental impact. In commercial 3D printing formulations, there is still a scarcity of efficient biobased polymer resins. This research proposes vegetable oils as biobased components to formulate the stereolithography (SLA) resin. Application of nanocellulose filler, prepared from agricultural waste, remarkably improves the printed material's performance properties. The strong bonding of nanofibrillated celluloses’ (NFCs’) matrix helps develop a strong interface and produce a polymer nanocomposite with enhanced thermal properties and dynamical mechanical characteristics. The ultra-low NFC content of 0.1–1.0 wt% (0.07–0.71 vol%) was examined in printed samples, with the lowest concentration yielding some of the most promising results. The developed SLA resins showed good printability, and the printing accuracy was not decreased by adding NFC. At the same time, an increase in the resin viscosity with higher filler loading was observed. Resins maintained high transparency in the 500–700 nm spectral region. The glass transition temperature for the 0.71 vol% composition increased by 28°C when compared to the nonreinforced composition. The nanocomposite's stiffness has increased fivefold for the 0.71 vol% composition. The thermal stability of printed compositions was retained after cellulose incorporation, and thermal conductivity was increased by 11%. Strong interfacial interactions were observed between the cellulose and the polymer in the form of hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl and ester groups, which were confirmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. This research demonstrates a great potential to use acrylated vegetable oils and nanocellulose fillers as a feedstock to produce high-performance resins for sustainable SLA 3D printing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Polymer Materials, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia.

Institute of Technical Physics, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia.

Institute of Design Technologies, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.01610.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016 ↗
2. Mohamed M, , Kumar H, , Wang Z, et al. Rapid and inexpensive fabrication of multi-depth microfluidic device using high-resolution LCD stereolithographic 3D printing. J Manuf Mater Process, 2019; 3; [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.3390/jmmp3010026
3. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0628110.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06281 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20200204410.1002/adma.202002044 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aaa239710.1126/science.aaa2397 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.12.01710.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.12.017 ↗
7. Zhang X, , Xu Y, , Li L, et al. Acrylate-based photosensitive resin for stereolithographic three-dimensional printing. J Appl Polym Sci, 2019; 136; [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1002/app.47487.
8. Ronca A, , Maiullari F, , Milan M, et al. Surface functionalization of acrylic based photocrosslinkable resin for 3D printing applications. Bioact Mater, 2017; 2:131–137.
9. Faludi J Cline-Thomas N Agrawala S. Chapter 5 3D printing and its environmental implications. In: The Next Production Revolution Implications for Government and Business. OECD Publishing 2017; pp. 171–213.
10. 10.1080/15459624.2019.161206810.1080/15459624.2019.1612068 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0200810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.12.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.12.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.08.01610.1016/j.mattod.2013.08.016 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0114310.1021/acsapm.9b01143 ↗
15. Skliutas E Kašėtaitė S Grigalevičiūtė G et al. Bioresists from renewable resources as sustainable photoresins for 3D laser microlithography: Material synthesis cross-linking rate and characterization of the structures. In: Advanced Fabrication Technologies for Micro/Nano Optics and Photonics X vol. 10115. Bellingham Washington USA: SPIE 2017; p. 1011514.10.1117/12.2249600 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3gc36961g10.1039/c3gc36961g ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1205116510.3390/polym12051165 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0114310.1021/acsapm.9b01143 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0164810.1021/acsomega.7b01648 ↗
20. 10.1039/D1GC01489G10.1039/D1GC01489G ↗
21. 10.1680/gmat.14.0000210.1680/gmat.14.00002 ↗
22. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0039210.3389/fchem.2020.00392 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10570-019-02312-410.1007/s10570-019-02312-4 ↗
24. Barkane A, , Kampe E, , Platnieks O, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibers: A comparative study of reinforcing effects in uv-cured vegetable oil nanocomposites. Nanomaterials, 2021; 11. [Epub ahead of [print]; DOI: 10.3390/nano11071791.
25. Samarasekara AMPB Kahavita KDHN Amarasinghe DAS et al. In Fabrication and Characterization of Nanofibrillated Cellulose (NFC) Reinforced Polymer Composite. In: 2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon). Moratuwa Sri Lanka: IEEE 2018; pp. 449–454.10.1109/MERCon.2018.8421934 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.032 ↗
27. 10.1080/09276440.2019.160097110.1080/09276440.2019.1600971 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11573910.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115739 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b0922310.1021/acsami.7b09223 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.2542110.1002/pen.25421 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11837-017-2294-x10.1007/s11837-017-2294-x ↗
32. 10.3390/ijms22231293910.3390/ijms222312939 ↗
33. MakerBot Thingiverse. https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1827 Accessed November10 2020.
34. 10.1177/228080001876477010.1177/2280800018764770 ↗
35. Kuhnt T, , Morgan FLC, , Baker MB, et al. An efficient and easily adjustable heating stage for digital light processing set-ups. Addit Manuf, 2021; 46. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102102.
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10910210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109102 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0099310.1021/acs.biomac.9b00993 ↗
38. 10.3390/fluids601003810.3390/fluids6010038 ↗
39. Treloar LRG. The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. USA: Oxford University Press 1975.
40. 10.1007/s10570-018-1739-x10.1007/s10570-018-1739-x ↗
41. 10.1007/s10570-007-9184-210.1007/s10570-007-9184-2 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1308119510.3390/polym13081195 ↗
43. 10.1002/pc.2260710.1002/pc.22607 ↗
44. 10.15376/biores.13.4.7709-772510.15376/biores.13.4.7709-7725 ↗
45. 10.1177/089270571773460310.1177/0892705717734603 ↗
46. Sharma A, , Thakur M, , Bhattacharya M, et al. Commercial application of cellulose nano-composites—A review. Biotechnol Rep (Amst), 2019; 21:e00316.
47. 10.1117/1.JBO.20.12.12700110.1117/1.JBO.20.12.127001 ↗
48. Di Francescantonio M, , Aguiar TR, , Arrais CAG, et al. Influence of viscosity and curing mode on degree of conversion of dual-cured resin cements. Eur J Dentistry, 2013; 7:5.
49. 10.1063/1.172379110.1063/1.1723791 ↗
50. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.7810.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.78 ↗
51. 10.1021/ma200725510.1021/ma2007255 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.06010.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.060 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10853-016-0155-610.1007/s10853-016-0155-6 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.002 ↗
55. 10.1002/app.4854410.1002/app.48544 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.508936510.1063/1.5089365 ↗
57. 10.1166/sam.2011.113610.1166/sam.2011.1136 ↗
58. 10.1007/s10853-017-1592-610.1007/s10853-017-1592-6 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.04310.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.043 ↗
60. Panwar V Pal K. Dynamic mechanical analysis of clay–polymer nanocomposites. In: Clay-Polymer Nanocomposites. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc. 2017; pp. 413–441.10.1016/B978-0-323-46153-5.00012-4 ↗
61. 10.1002/smll.20210081710.1002/smll.202100817 ↗
62. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/49/49530210.1088/0957-4484/27/49/495302 ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20190714210.1002/adma.201907142 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11295510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112955 ↗
65. Boparai KS Singh R. Thermoplastic Composites for Fused Deposition Modeling Filament: Challenges and Applications. In: Encyclopedia of Materials: Composites. Brabazon D ed. Elsevier: Oxford 2018; pp. 774–784.10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11409-2 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.075 ↗
67. Huang J, , Zhou J, , Liu M. Interphase in polymer nanocomposites. JACS Au, 2022. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.1c00430.
68. Wool RP. Bio-based composites from soybean oil and chicken feathers. In: Bio-Based Polymers and Composites. Wool RP Sun XS eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc. 2005; pp. 411–447.10.1016/B978-012763952-9/50013-7 ↗
69. Chmielewski M, , Weglewski W. Comparison of experimental and modelling results of thermal properties in Cu-AlN composite materials. Bull Polish Acad Sci Techn Sci, 2013; 61:507–514.
70. Vengatesan MR Varghese AM Mittal V. Chapter 3 Thermal properties of thermoset polymers. In: Thermosets 2nd ed. Guo Q ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc. 2018; pp. 69–114.10.1016/B978-0-08-101021-1.00003-4 ↗
71. HPS AK Saurabh CK Asniza M et al. 1—Nanofibrillated cellulose reinforcement in thermoset polymer composites. In: Cellulose-Reinforced Nanofibre Composites. Jawaid M Boufi S Abdul Khalil HPS eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc. 2017; pp. 1–24.10.1016/B978-0-08-100957-4.00001-2 ↗
72. 10.1039/D0GC01250E10.1039/D0GC01250E ↗
73. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11736610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117366 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.10934710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109347 ↗
75. Ouarhim W Zari N Bouhfid R et al. Mechanical performance of natural fibers-based thermosetting composites. In: Mechanical and Physical Testing of Biocomposites Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc. 2019; pp. 43–60.10.1016/B978-0-08-102292-4.00003-5 ↗
76. 10.1063/1.172971110.1063/1.1729711 ↗
77. Ye P. Mamunya, Davydenko VV, Pissis P, et al. Electrical and thermal conductivity of polymers filled with metal powders. Eur Polym J, 2002; 38:10.
78. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.04110.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.041 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.mser.2018.06.00210.1016/j.mser.2018.06.002 ↗
80. 10.3390/polym909043710.3390/polym9090437 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.09010.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.090 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.elstat.2009.06.00410.1016/j.elstat.2009.06.004 ↗
83. Wen-Dong L Li-Yuan Z Chao W et al. Dielectric properties and 3D printing fesibility of UV curable polymer composites. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application (ICHVE). 2018; pp. 1–4.10.1109/ICHVE.2018.8642258 ↗
84. 10.4236/aces.2015.5302810.4236/aces.2015.53028 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.08.01210.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.08.012 ↗
86. 10.3390/nano912172610.3390/nano9121726 ↗
87. 10.3390/polym910054110.3390/polym9100541 ↗
88. 10.1002/polb.2461010.1002/polb.24610 ↗
89. 10.3390/molecules2421385810.3390/molecules24213858 ↗
90. 10.1021/bm400173410.1021/bm4001734 ↗
91. 10.3390/ma1109161510.3390/ma11091615 ↗
92. Wang Z, , Ding Y, , Wang J. Novel polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) supramolecular composite hydrogels: Preparation and application as soil conditioners. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2019; 9. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.3390/nano9101397.
93. 10.1002/app.2232210.1002/app.22322 ↗
94. 10.3390/molecules20081419110.3390/molecules200814191 ↗
95. 10.1039/C5RA04399A10.1039/C5RA04399A ↗
96. Firdous Habib MB. Synthesis and characterization of acrylated epoxidized soybean oil for UV cured coatings. Chem Chem Technol, 2011; 5:10.
97. 10.3390/polym1009097910.3390/polym10090979 ↗
98. Seabra CP, , Sousa AC, , Bragança IMF, et al. On the performance and recyclability of a green composite based on AESO resin. J Manuf Mater Process, 2020; 4. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.3390/jmmp4030065.
99. 10.1002/app.3141110.1002/app.31411 ↗
100. Yang Y, , Shen M, , Huang X, et al. Synthesis and performance of a thermosetting resin: Acrylated epoxidized soybean oil curing with a rosin-based acrylamide. J Appl Polym Sci, 2017; 134.[Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1002/app.44545.