Three-Dimensional Printed Stamps for the Fabrication of Patterned Microwells and High-Throughput Production of Homogeneous Cell Spheroids
Source abstract
Abstract
Aggregation of cells into spheroids and organoids is a promising tool for regenerative medicine, cancer and cell biology, and drug discovery due to their recapitulation of the cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions found in vivo . Traditional approaches for the production of spheroids, such as the hanging drop method, are limited by the lack of reproducibility and the use of labor-intensive and time-consuming techniques. The need for high-throughput approaches allowing for the quick and reproducible formation of cell aggregates has driven the development of soft lithography techniques based on the patterning of microwells into nonadherent hydrogels. However, these methods are also limited by costly, labor-intensive, and multistep protocols that could impact the sterility of the process and efficiency of spheroid formation. In this study, we describe a one-step method for the fabrication of patterned nonadherent microwells into tissue culture plates using three-dimensional (3D) printed stamps and evaluate the production of cell spheroids of different sizes and cell sources. The generation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell and endothelial cell spheroids by the use of 3D printed stamps was superior in comparison with a widely used multistep mold technique, yielding spheroids of larger sizes and higher DNA content. The 3D stamps produced spheroids of more consistent diameter and DNA content when compared with other commercially available methods. These 3D printed stamps offer a tunable, simple, fast, and cost-effective approach for the production of reproducible spheroids and organoids for a wide range of applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1748-605X/aab0b310.1088/1748-605X/aab0b3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.12.00510.1016/j.stem.2015.12.005 ↗
3. 10.1002/stem.305610.1002/stem.3056 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.024 ↗
5. 10.1002/stem.285310.1002/stem.2853 ↗
6. 10.1089/ten.teb.2016.032210.1089/ten.teb.2016.0322 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature2204710.1038/nature22047 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncb331210.1038/ncb3312 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.aaw698510.1126/science.aaw6985 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.gde.2018.09.00110.1016/j.gde.2018.09.001 ↗
11. 10.1002/ar.109001050310.1002/ar.1090010503 ↗
12. Sutherland RM, , McCredie JA, , Inch WR. Growth of multicell spheroids in tissue culture as a model of nodular carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1971; 46:113–120.
13. Yuhas JM, , Li AP, , Martinez AO, et al. A simplified method for production and growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Cancer Res, 1977; 37:3639–3643.
14. 10.1002/biot.20170041710.1002/biot.201700417 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.008.110023062110.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.008.1100230621 ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2010.2310.1038/nnano.2010.23 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.00310.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.003 ↗
18. 10.1517/14712598.2012.70718110.1517/14712598.2012.707181 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja037677h10.1021/ja037677h ↗
20. 10.1002/jbm.a.3082110.1002/jbm.a.30821 ↗
21. 10.1038/nprot.2009.23410.1038/nprot.2009.234 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.024 ↗
23. 10.1088/1758-5082/3/2/02500210.1088/1758-5082/3/2/025002 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7741-3_1110.1007/978-1-4939-7741-3_11 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10439-015-1400-x10.1007/s10439-015-1400-x ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.00710.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.03710.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.037 ↗
28. 10.1038/nature2233010.1038/nature22330 ↗
29. 10.1002/adbi.20180011010.1002/adbi.201800110 ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.100811710710.1073/pnas.1008117107 ↗
31. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.064010.1089/ten.tea.2011.0640 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.030 ↗
33. 10.1002/adbi.20190014110.1002/adbi.201900141 ↗
34. 10.1038/nprot.2009.9610.1038/nprot.2009.96 ↗
35. 10.1007/s12195-018-0531-110.1007/s12195-018-0531-1 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.245129010.1126/science.2451290 ↗
37. 10.1096/fj.14-26763310.1096/fj.14-267633 ↗
38. 10.1593/tlo.1118710.1593/tlo.11187 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.037 ↗
40. 10.1021/am500367h10.1021/am500367h ↗
41. 10.1021/la00017a03010.1021/la00017a030 ↗
42. 10.2144/00011331710.2144/000113317 ↗
43. 10.1371/journal.pone.009361810.1371/journal.pone.0093618 ↗
44. 10.1126/science.aaa239710.1126/science.aaa2397 ↗