journal article·2022-08-01Open access

Effective Mechanical Properties of AlSi7Mg Additively Manufactured Cubic Lattice Structures

Sara Mantovani, Mauro Giacalone, Andrea Merulla, Elena Bassoli, Silvio Defanti

Abstract

Lattice structures, whose manufacturing has been enabled by additive technologies, are gaining growing popularity in all the fields where lightweighting is imperative. Since the complexity of the lattice geometries stretches the technological boundaries even of additive processes, the manufactured structures can be significantly different from the nominal ones, in terms of expected dimensions but also of defects. Therefore, the successful use of lattices needs the combined optimization of their design, structural modeling, build orientation, and setup. The article reports the results of quasi-static compression tests performed on BCCxyz lattices manufactured in a AlSi7Mg alloy using additive manufacturing. The results are compared with numerical simulations using two different approaches. The findings show the influence of the relative density on stiffness, strength, and on the energy absorption properties of the lattice. The correlation with the technological feasibility points out credible improvements in the choice of a unit cell with fewer manufacturing issues, lower density, and possibly equal mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering “Enzo Ferrari,” University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Ferrari S. p. A., Maranello, Italy.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.01.01110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.01.011 ↗
2. Wang X, , Wei K, , Wang K, et al. Effective thermal conductivity and heat transfer characteristics for a series of lightweight lattice core sandwich panels. Appl Therm Eng, 2020; 173.
3. 10.1121/1.497993410.1121/1.4979934 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.12710.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.127 ↗
5. 10.1177/0021955X1663903510.1177/0021955X16639035 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.13510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.135 ↗
7. Mantovani S Campo GA Giacalone M. Steering column support topology optimization including lattice structure for metal additive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 2020.10.1177/0954406220947121 ↗
8. 10.1177/095440542094920910.1177/0954405420949209 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.04810.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 ↗
10. Li B, , Hesar BD, , Zhao Y, et al. Design and additive manufacturing of porous titanium scaffolds for optimum cell viability in bone tissue engineering. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 2020.
11. 10.1007/s11665-021-05865-310.1007/s11665-021-05865-3 ↗
12. 10.1089/3dp.2018.012510.1089/3dp.2018.0125 ↗
13. 10.1089/3dp.2019.011910.1089/3dp.2019.0119 ↗
14. Defanti S Bassoli E. Repeatability of the fatigue performance of additively manufactured A357. 0 under different thermal treatment conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 2021:805.10.1016/j.msea.2020.140594 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.01.00210.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.01.002 ↗
16. Plocher J, , Panesar A. Review on design and structural optimisation in additive manufacturing: Towards next-generation lightweight structures. Mater Des, 2019; 183.
17. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.09210.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.092 ↗
18. Patterson AE, , Lee YH, , Allison JT. Generation and enforcement of process-driven manufacturability constraints: A survey of methods and perspectives for product design. J Mech Des, 2021; 143.
19. 10.3390/app1105211210.3390/app11052112 ↗
20. ASTM International, ISO/ASTM 52911-1:2019(E) - Additive manufacturing—Design—Part 1: Laser-based powder bed fusion of metals. ASTM Int, 2019:1–15. DOI:10.1520/52911-1-19.2
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.04310.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.043 ↗
22. Wang Y, , Xia J, , Luo Z, et al. Self-supporting topology optimization method for selective laser melting. Addit Manuf, 2020; 36.
23. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.02910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.029 ↗
24. Brackett D Ashcroft I Hague R. Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Vol. 1 Austin TX August 2011 pp.348–362.
25. Mazur M, , Leary M, McMillan M et al. Mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V and AlSi12Mg lattice structures manufactured by Selective Laser Melting (SLM). In: Brandt M, ed. Laser Additive Manufacturing. Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier, 2017, pp.119–161
26. 10.1504/IJMR.2019.10001210.1504/IJMR.2019.100012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.01710.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.017 ↗
28. Bacciaglia A Ceruti A Liverani A. Additive manufacturing challenges and future developments in the next ten years. In International Conference on Design Simulation Manufacturing: The Innovation Exchange 2019 September Vol. 1. Modena Italy: Springer Cham; pp.891–902.10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_76 ↗
29. Gibson LJ Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties (2nd ed. Cambridge Solid State Science Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.
30. 10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.01210.1016/j.addma.2017.06.012 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma804187110.3390/ma8041871 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.01010.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.04.00310.1016/j.addma.2017.04.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00610.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006 ↗
37. 10.1080/17452759.2019.161575010.1080/17452759.2019.1615750 ↗
38. Shi X, , Liao W, , Li P, et al. Comparison of compression performance and energy absorption of lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Adv Eng Mater, 2020; 22.
39. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.00710.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.007 ↗
41. 10.2514/3.1107810.2514/3.11078 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.008 ↗
43. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00141-710.1016/0266-3538(95)00141-7 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.027 ↗
45. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-006910.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0069 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11182110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111821 ↗
47. I Standard IS O 13314 Mechanical testing of metals ductility testing compression test for porous and cellular metals Reference Number ISO. 13314 (2011):1–7. ISO 13314:2011.
48. 10.1007/s11340-015-0021-510.1007/s11340-015-0021-5 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.07010.1016/j.msea.2013.07.070 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.07510.1016/j.msea.2016.05.075 ↗
51. 10.1111/ffe.1358710.1111/ffe.13587 ↗
52. 10.3390/ma1413365410.3390/ma14133654 ↗
53. 10.1115/1.403395710.1115/1.4033957 ↗
54. Feng Q, , Tang Q, , Liu Z, et al. An investigation of the mechanical properties of metallic lattice structures fabricated using selective laser melting. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 2018;232;1719–1730.
55. 10.1007/s11465-019-0549-710.1007/s11465-019-0549-7 ↗
56. Maconachie T, , Leary M, , Tran P, et al. The effect of topology on the quasi-static and dynamic behaviour of SLM AlSi10Mg lattice structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2021.
57. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.025 ↗
58. 10.1177/095440621986974110.1177/0954406219869741 ↗
59. Boniotti L, , Beretta S, , Foletti S, et al. Strain concentrations in BCC micro lattices obtained by AM. Proc Struct Integr, 2017; 7:166–173.
60. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.04110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.041 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10768510.1016/j.matdes.2019.107685 ↗
62. 10.1108/RPJ-10-2018-027010.1108/RPJ-10-2018-0270 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.004 ↗
64. Wang G, , Chen X, , Qiu C. On the macro-and micro-deformation mechanisms of selectively laser melted damage tolerant metallic lattice structures. J Alloys Compd, 2021; 852.
65. 10.1007/s12541-016-0097-610.1007/s12541-016-0097-6 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.010 ↗
67. Mazur M, , Leary M, , Sun S, et al. Deformation and failure behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM). Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2016; 84:1391–1411.