Assessing the Design and Compressive Performance of Material Extruded Lattice Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
With additive manufacturing increasingly being embraced in the area of sports technology, focus has shifted toward cellular structures for impact protection. Periodic lattice structures can be tailored for a specific response by modifying the geometry of individual cells, with the structure capable of being modified to conform around a given body. However, the effect of modifying specific design characteristics within a lattice and the interrelationships between them are not well understood. This study examines five geometric design variables: cell width, strut cross-sectional area (CSA), strut shape, cell orientation, and joint filleting, and their effect on the compressive behavior of a lattice structure. Truncated octahedron lattices were manufactured using nylon through the process of material extrusion and tested under compression at a constant strain rate of 1.0 s −1 . Design of experiments was utilized to analyze the results by implementing a 2 (5-1) factorial design. Results indicated that the strut CSA, cell width, and interaction between the two design characteristics had the largest effects on the plateau stress of the lattice and its energy capacity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Design and Creative Arts, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
School of Design, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0284402410.1007/BF02844024 ↗
2. Knouse CL, , Gould TE, , Caswell SV, et al. Efficacy of rugby headgear in attenuating repetitive linear impact forces. J Athl Train, 2003; 38:330–335.
3. Kajtaz M, , Subic A. Experimental investigation into suitability of smart polymers as an impact-absorbing material for an improved rugby headgear. Int Conf Mech Mater, 2015; 62–74.
4. Michel FI, , Schmitt K, , Liechti B, et al. Functionality of back protectors in snow sports concerning safety. In: 8th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association (ISEA), Vienna, Austria, July 12–16, 2010. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 2869–2874.
5. Gibson LJ Ashby MF. Cellular Solids 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
6. 10.1098/rspa.1982.008810.1098/rspa.1982.0088 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.06210.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.062 ↗
8. 10.1177/0887302X1350611010.1177/0887302X13506110 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00051-410.1016/S0003-4878(99)00051-4 ↗
10. Dorman LE, , Havenith G. The effects of protective clothing and its properties on energy consumption during different activities. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2009; 105:463–470.10.1007/s00421-008-0924-2 ↗
11. 10.1243/17543371JSET3110.1243/17543371JSET31 ↗
12. 10.1080/17452759.2017.136943810.1080/17452759.2017.1369438 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00170-015-6972-y10.1007/s00170-015-6972-y ↗
14. 10.1088/1742-6596/382/1/01204210.1088/1742-6596/382/1/012042 ↗
15. Nike. Nike Launches Summer 2014 Football Inovations. Nike News 2014. Available at: http://news.nike.com/news/nike-launches-summer-2014-football-equipment-innovations Accessed February3 2016.
16. Brennan-Craddock JPJ, , Bingham GA, , Hague RJM, , Wildman RD. Impact absorbent rapid manufactured structures (IARMS). In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas, USA, August 4–6, 2008, pp. 266–277.
17. Adidas. Adidas Breaks the Mold With 3D-Printer Footwear. 2016. Available at: www.adidas-group.com/en/media/news-archive/press-releases/2015/adidas-breaks-mould-3d-printed-performance-footwear Accessed October24 2016.
18. Balance N. The Future of Running is here. 2016. Available at: www.newbalance.com/article?id=4041 Accessed October24 2016.
19. Underarmour. UA ArchiTech Futurist. 2017. Available at: www.underarmour.com/en-us/mens-ua-architech-futurist-training-shoes/pid3000347 Accessed October16 2017.
20. Nike. At Nike the future is faster and it's 3D. 2016. Available at: https://news.nike.com/news/nike-hp-3d-printing Accessed October16 2017.
21. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.00510.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.03410.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.034 ↗
23. Kalpakjian S Schmid S. Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education 2008.
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.05310.1016/j.msea.2011.03.053 ↗
25. 10.1098/rsta.2010.001010.1098/rsta.2010.0010 ↗
26. Brennan-Craddock J. The Investigation of a Method to Generate Conformal Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing. School of Mechanical Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering Loughborough University 2011.
27. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2011.01.00410.1016/j.jmapro.2011.01.004 ↗
28. Manfredi D, , Calignano F, , Ambrosio EP, et al. Direct Metal Laser Sintering: An additive manufacturing technology ready to produce lightweight structural parts for robotic applications. Metall Ital, 2013; 105:15–24.
29. 10.1108/RPJ-10-2013-009910.1108/RPJ-10-2013-0099 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.402872410.1115/1.4028724 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00170030003410.1007/s001700300034 ↗
32. 10.1155/2012/40780510.1155/2012/407805 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0261232210.1007/BF02612322 ↗
34. Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab Bonded and Molded Urethane Foam. ASTM Standard D3574-11 2011.
35. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.09510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.095 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.11.00210.1016/j.jmapro.2015.11.002 ↗
37. 10.1002/cplx.2012310.1002/cplx.20123 ↗
38. 10.1108/1355254061065244710.1108/13552540610652447 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11665-016-2157-610.1007/s11665-016-2157-6 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00050-210.1016/S0261-3069(97)00050-2 ↗
41. 10.1177/0021955X0606351910.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
42. 10.1179/02670830222500209210.1179/026708302225002092 ↗
43. 10.1198/tas.2006.s4610.1198/tas.2006.s46 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.09.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.09.001 ↗
45. Fujikawa T, , Sugiura R, , Nishikata R, et al. Critical contact pressure and transferred energy for soft tissue injury by blunt impact in human-robot interaction. In: 17th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Jeju, South Korea, October 18–21, 2017, pp. 867–872. DOI: 10.23919/ICCAS.2017.8204347