Tensile, Fatigue Properties and Their Anisotropies of Al-Mg Alloy Fabricated by Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
The microstructure, mechanical properties (tensile, fatigue, etc.) and the anisotropies of the Al-Mg alloy fabricated by wire arc additive manufacturing are studied in this work. The results show that the microstructure of the deposited alloy is composed of coarse columnar grains in the inner-layer region and fine equiaxed grains in the interlayer region. The tensile and fatigue properties exhibit strong anisotropies. The ultimate tensile strength (258 MPa), yield strength (140 MPa), elongation (21.3%), and fatigue life (2.56 × 10 5 ) of the sample along travel direction (0° direction) are the best, whereas those of the sample along the deposited direction (90° direction) are the lowest and those of the sample along 45° direction are the medium. It is found that the lowest strength and elongation of the sample in the deposited direction can be attributed to the large weak bonding areas between the deposition layers, whereas the lowest fatigue property is associated with the fatigue crack propagation along the grain boundaries of the columnar grains.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Materials, Metallurgy and Chemistry, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Low-Grade Refractory Gold Ores, Xiamen, China.
Engineering Research Center of Continuous Extrusion, Ministry of Education, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, China.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11665-011-9998-910.1007/s11665-011-9998-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10326010.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103260 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.00810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.008 ↗
4. 10.2514/1.A3354410.2514/1.A33544 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.10910.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.109 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.01910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11197710.1016/j.matchar.2022.111977 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.06110.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.061 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.01310.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.013 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001 ↗
12. 10.1080/02670836.2018.145501210.1080/02670836.2018.1455012 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11727110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117271 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.11710.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.117 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.03310.1016/j.jmapro.2019.10.033 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma1413366510.3390/ma14133665 ↗
17. Geng R, , Du J, , Wei Z, et al. Multiscale modelling of microstructure, micro-segregation, and local mechanical properties of Al-Cu alloys in wire and arc additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2020; 36(2):101735; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101735
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.04810.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.048 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.11310.1016/j.msea.2017.11.113 ↗
20. Tawfik MM, , Nemat-Alla MM, , Dewidar MM. Effect of travel speed on the properties of Al-Mg aluminum alloy fabricated by wire arc additive manufacturing. J Mater Eng Perform, 2021; 2021:1–8; doi: 10.1007/s11665-021-05959-y
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.11510.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.115 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.25510.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.255 ↗
23. 10.1504/IJPD.2014.06002810.1504/IJPD.2014.060028 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.rcim.2014.08.00810.1016/j.rcim.2014.08.008 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.07610.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.076 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.04.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.04.012 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11665-021-05528-310.1007/s11665-021-05528-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.10110.1016/j.msea.2015.10.101 ↗
29. Sun J, , Yang K, , Wang Q, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of 5356 aluminum alloy fabricated by TIG arc additive manufacturing. Acta Metall Sin, 2021; 57:666–674; doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.045
30. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.02810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.028 ↗
31. Paris PC, , Gomez MP, , Anderson WE. A rational analytic theory of fatiuge. Trends Eng, 1961; 13:9–14
32. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.014 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.020 ↗
34. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00214-710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00214-7 ↗
35. Laird C. The influence of metallurgical structure on the mechanism of fatigue crack propagation. ASTM STP, 1967; 415:131–68; doi: 10.1520/STP47230S
36. 10.3390/jmse1010155710.3390/jmse10101557 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.acme.2016.01.00410.1016/j.acme.2016.01.004 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00155-410.1016/S0142-1123(01)00155-4 ↗
39. 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10403-210.1016/0921-5093(96)10403-2 ↗