journal article·2025-04-01Open access

3D-Printed Mycelium Biocomposites: Method for 3D Printing and Growing Fungi-Based Composites

Danli Luo, Junchao Yang, Nadya Peek

Abstract

Despite recent advances in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, the main materials in rapid prototyping are derived from finite resources such as petroleum-based plastics. Researchers are developing alternatives to exhaustible and potentially environmentally harmful materials through biomaterials. Mycelium biocomposites are one promising area of inquiry; when mycelium decomposes biomass, it produces a composite biomaterial, which is fully compostable and has beneficial structural and hydrophobic properties. However, mold-based fabrication methods for biocomposites require tooling and limit the possible shapes. We introduce a novel method for directly 3D printing mycelium biocomposites without the need for molds or tooling. Our method comprises three main contributions: Mycofluid, a mycelium-inoculated paste that uses spent coffee grounds, a recycled biomass; Fungibot, a custom hardware system for 3D printing biopastes like Mycofluid; and a method for incubating mycelial growth within fresh 3D prints resulting in mycelium biocomposite parts. We illustrate our contributions through a series of objects showcasing our method and the material qualities of the parts. Notably, we demonstrate how living mycelium can fuse separate prints, enabling complex geometries that are otherwise challenging to 3D print as one part.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies · Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research · Cephalopods and Marine Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Human-Centered Design and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Song KW Paulos E. Unmaking: Enabling and celebrating the creative material of failure destruction decay and deformation. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM: Yokohama Japan; 2021; pp. 1–12; doi: 10.1145/3411764.344552910.1145/3411764.3445529 ↗
2. Kohtala C. Making “Making” critical: How sustainability is constituted in fab lab ideology. Des J, 2017; 20(3):375–394; doi: 10.1080/14606925.2016.1261504
3. 10.1089/3dp.2016.002710.1089/3dp.2016.0027 ↗
4. 10.1126/sciadv.160198410.1126/sciadv.1601984 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41563-023-01615-z10.1038/s41563-023-01615-z ↗
6. 10.1126/sciadv.add711810.1126/sciadv.add7118 ↗
7. Bayer E McIntyre G. Ecovative—Mycelium technology | Sustainable & Biodegradable Material. 2007. Available from: https://www.ecovative.com/ [Last accessed: August21 2023].
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.21110.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.211 ↗
9. Heisel F Schlesier K Lee J et al. Design of a Load-Bearing Mycelium Structure through Informed Structural Engineering: The MycoTree at the 2017 Seoul Biennale of Architecture and Urbanism. 2017.
10. Klarenbeek E Dros M. Klarenbeek & Dros—Designers of the Unusual. n.d. Available from: https://www.ericklarenbeek.com/ [Last accessed: August21 2023].
11. 10.1089/3dp.2020.017110.1089/3dp.2020.0171 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11903710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119037 ↗
13. 10.1007/s44150-022-00073-610.1007/s44150-022-00073-6 ↗
14. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002210.1089/3dp.2015.0022 ↗
15. Benjamin D. Hy-Fi Tower. 2015. Available from: http://www.thelivingnewyork.com/ [Last accessed: November16 2023].
16. Scott J Ozkan D Hoenerloh A et al. Bioknit Building: Strategies for Living Textile Architectures. In: International Conference Construction Energy Environment and Sustainability (CEES 2021) Newcastle University; 2021.
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12273210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122732 ↗
18. Bakker R Sembi H “Ram” Andersson J et al. “Symbiocene Living. 2023. Available from: https://plplabs.com/symbiocene/ [Last accessed: November16 2023].
19. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13843110.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138431 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11248110.1016/j.matdes.2023.112481 ↗
21. 10.1039/D3MH01277H10.1039/D3MH01277H ↗
22. 10.1038/s41563-022-01429-510.1038/s41563-022-01429-5 ↗
23. Anonymous. Technical-Data. n.d. Available from: https://mushroompackaging.com/pages/technical-data [Last accessed: April12 2024].
24. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0252710.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02527 ↗
25. Anonymous. Overview of Materials for Expanded Polystyrene (EPS). n.d. Available from: https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet.aspx?matguid=5f099f2b5eeb41cba804ca0bc64fa62f&ckck=1 [Last accessed: April12 2024].
26. Gough P Perera PB Kertesz MA et al. Design mould grow!: A fabrication pipeline for growing 3d designs using myco-materials. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ‘23 Association for Computing Machinery: New York NY USA; 2023; pp. 1–15; doi: 10.1145/3544548.358095810.1145/3544548.3580958 ↗
27. Adamatzky A Gandia A Ayres P et al. Adaptive Fungal Architectures. 2021;66–77.
28. Anonymous. Kagome. 2021. Available from: http://www.fungar.eu/tag/kagome/ [Last accessed: April10 2023].
29. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.122969310.3389/fbioe.2023.1229693 ↗
30. Scott J, , Bridgens B, , Ozkan D, et al. The Living Room: Transitioning to Regional Waste Streams for BioHybrid Textile Production. CEES 2nd Int Conf Constr Energy Environ Sustain, 2023.
31. 10.3390/biomimetics703012910.3390/biomimetics7030129 ↗
32. 10.3390/biomimetics702004210.3390/biomimetics7020042 ↗
33. Anonymous. Marvel Labs. n.d. Available from: https://marvellabs.com/ [Last accessed: November29 2023].
34. Rivera ML Bae SS Hudson SE. Designing a sustainable material for 3D printing with spent coffee grounds. In: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. DIS ‘23 Association for Computing Machinery: New York NY USA; 2023; pp. 294–311; doi: 10.1145/3563657.359598310.1145/3563657.3595983 ↗
35. 10.1002/pol.2021068310.1002/pol.20210683 ↗
36. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0733010.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07330 ↗
37. Schulte D Morales E Barba E et al. Manufactura.Co. 2023. Available from: https://manufactura.co/en/ [Last accessed: November29 2023].
38. Aşut S. Olive Pomace—3D Print Material. 2022. Available from: https://commons.materiom.org/data-commons/recipe/649c36218e0f06dcab0b7d27 [Last accessed: November29 2023].
39. Aşut S Jönsthövel I Baloğlu M. PROJECT POMACE. 2020. Available from: https://pomace.nl/ [Last accessed: November29 2023].
40. 10.3390/biomimetics802025710.3390/biomimetics8020257 ↗
41. Anonymous. 3d Printed Artefacts. n.d. Available from: https://www.blast-studio.com [Last accessed: August21 2023].
42. 10.3390/biomimetics806050410.3390/biomimetics8060504 ↗
43. Colmo C Ayres P. 3d printed bio-hybrid structures - investigating the architectural potentials of mycoremediation. Berlin Germany; 2020; pp. 573–582; doi: 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2020.1.57310.52842/conf.ecaade.2020.1.573 ↗
44. 10.1177/1478077122108224810.1177/14780771221082248 ↗
45. 10.2307/j.ctv13xpsvw.1010.2307/j.ctv13xpsvw.10 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.sftr.2022.10008510.1016/j.sftr.2022.100085 ↗
47. 10.1002/gch2.20230014010.1002/gch2.202300140 ↗
48. Stamets P. Growing Gourmet and Medicinal Mushrooms. Clarkson Potter/Ten Speed; 2011.
49. 10.1021/acsabm.4c0004810.1021/acsabm.4c00048 ↗
50. 10.1002/adfm.20230187510.1002/adfm.202301875 ↗
51. 10.1145/360932810.1145/3609328 ↗
52. Fossdal FH Nguyen V Heldal R et al. Vespidae: A programming framework for developing digital fabrication workflows. In: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. DIS ‘23 Association for Computing Machinery: New York NY USA; 2023; pp. 2034–2049; doi: 10.1145/3563657.359610610.1145/3563657.3596106 ↗
53. Buechley L. 3D printable play-dough: New biodegradable materials and creative possibilities for digital fabrication. 2023.10.1145/3544548.3580813 ↗
54. 10.1089/3dp.2017.003710.1089/3dp.2017.0037 ↗
55. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002110.1089/3dp.2015.0021 ↗
56. Vasquez J Twigg-Smith H Tran OJ et al. Jubilee: An extensible machine for multi-tool fabrication. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ‘20 Association for Computing Machinery: New York NY USA; 2020; pp. 1–13; doi: 10.1145/3313831.337642510.1145/3313831.3376425 ↗
57. Fossdal FH Dyvik J Nilsson JA et al. Fabricatable machines: A toolkit for building digital fabrication machines. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction. TEI ‘20 Association for Computing Machinery: New York NY USA; 2020; pp. 411–422; doi: 10.1145/3374920.337492910.1145/3374920.3374929 ↗
58. Cera B. CERA-1 Clay 3D Printer Extruder. 2020. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/openprojectspage/cera-1-clay-extruder [Last accessed: August21 2023].
59. Lauerman T. Tom Lauerman’s Personal Website. 2016. Available from: https://www.tomlauerman.com/ [Last accessed: August21 2023].
60. Berezkin A. StoneFlower3D 3D Clay Printing. 2013. Available from: https://www.stoneflower3d.com/opensource/ [Last accessed: August21 2023].
61. Anonymous. HOW TO MAKE CLAY MIXTURE for 3D Printing - WASP. 2020.
62. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.03.00810.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.03.008 ↗
63. Hendrikx B. Living coffin. 2020. Available from: https://www.studiohendrikx.com/loop [Last accessed: November30 2023].