journal article·2023-10-01Open access

Assessing Leachable Cytotoxicity of 3D-Printed Polymers and Facile Detoxification Methods

Venkatakrishnan Rengarajan, Angela Clyde, Jefferson Pontsler, Jonathan Valiente, Adreann Peel, Yu Huang

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of polymers is gaining momentum in health care industries by providing rapid 3D printing of customizable designs. Yet, little is explored about the cytotoxicity of leachable toxins that the 3D printing process introduced into the final product. We studied three printable materials, which have various mechanical properties and are widely used in stereolithography 3D printing. We evaluated the cytotoxicity of these materials through exposing two fibroblast cell lines (human and mouse derived) to the 3D-printed parts, using overlay indirect contact assays. All the 3D-printed parts were measured toxic to the cells in a leachable manner, with flexible materials more toxic than rigid materials. Furthermore, we attempted to reduce the toxicity of the 3D-printed material by employing three treatment methods (further curing, passivation coating, and Soxhlet solvent extraction). The Soxhlet solvent extraction method was the most effective in removing the leachable toxins, resulting in the eradication of the material's toxicity. Passivation coating and further curing showed moderate and little detoxification, respectively. Additionally, mechanical testing of the materials treated with extraction methods revealed no significant impacts on its mechanical performances. As leachable toxins are broadly present in 3D-printed polymers, our cytotoxicity evaluation and reduction methods could aid in extending the selections of biocompatible materials and pave the way for the translational use of 3D printing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.

Institute of Antiviral Research, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002210.1089/3dp.2015.0022 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.00410.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.004 ↗
3. 10.1109/MCG.2016.110.1109/MCG.2016.1 ↗
4. 10.3390/s1907166310.3390/s19071663 ↗
5. 10.1108/0144515031050119010.1108/01445150310501190 ↗
6. 10.1021/ac403397r10.1021/ac403397r ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1003024310.3390/ma10030243 ↗
8. 10.3390/jfb901002210.3390/jfb9010022 ↗
9. 10.1039/D0LC00757A10.1039/D0LC00757A ↗
10. 10.1002/adhm.20170116110.1002/adhm.201701161 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.00310.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.003 ↗
12. 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-410.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.10581410.1016/j.microc.2020.105814 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11517-015-1418-010.1007/s11517-015-1418-0 ↗
15. 10.1055/s-0035-156339210.1055/s-0035-1563392 ↗
16. 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE1637110.3171/2016.9.SPINE16371 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.005 ↗
18. 10.1155/2017/892505010.1155/2017/8925050 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0030210.1021/acs.est.7b00302 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.01.02310.1016/j.procir.2013.01.023 ↗
21. Grover WH Oskui SM. Treatment for reducing the toxicity of 3D-printed parts. U.S. Patent No. 10 201 964. (last accessed February12 2019).
22. 10.1054/bjps.1999.326810.1054/bjps.1999.3268 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1313301110.3390/ma13133011 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.00310.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003 ↗
25. Campbell T Williams C Ivanova O et al. Could 3D Printing Change the World. Technologies Potential and Implications of Additive Manufacturing Washington DC: Atlantic Council 2011; p. 3.
26. 10.1007/s00542-017-3342-810.1007/s00542-017-3342-8 ↗
27. Hanna SD. Detoxification of solid freeform fabrication materials. U.S. Patent No. 6 996 245. (last accessed February7 2006).
28. 10.1021/acsapm.8b0016510.1021/acsapm.8b00165 ↗
29. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1108039010.3390/pharmaceutics11080390 ↗
30. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1203026610.3390/pharmaceutics12030266 ↗
31. 10.1111/jerd.1243810.1111/jerd.12438 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
33. 10.3390/mi902009110.3390/mi9020091 ↗
34. 10.18063/ijb.v6i4.26710.18063/ijb.v6i4.267 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b0024910.1021/acs.estlett.5b00249 ↗
36. 10.1515/cdbme-2016-002810.1515/cdbme-2016-0028 ↗
37. 10.1080/00016350075005177310.1080/000163500750051773 ↗
38. 10.4047/jkap.2008.46.6.63910.4047/jkap.2008.46.6.639 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.1990.07039040410.1002/app.1990.070390404 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.dental.2021.01.01610.1016/j.dental.2021.01.016 ↗
41. 10.1089/3dp.2017.006410.1089/3dp.2017.0064 ↗
42. Popov VK, , Evseev AV, , Ivanov AL, et al. Laser stereolithography and supercritical fluid processing for custom-designed implant fabrication. J Mater Sci, 2004; 15:123–128.
43. Wallin RF, , Arscott E. A practical guide to ISO 10993-5: Cytotoxicity. Med Device Diagn Ind, 1998; 20:96–98.
44. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.01810.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0026-0657(97)86572-110.1016/S0026-0657(97)86572-1 ↗
46. 10.3390/mi1110090310.3390/mi11100903 ↗
47. Rengarajan V. Fabrication of 3D hydrogel-based microscale tissue analog chip with integrated optofluidics. 2016. Dissertations. 1550. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations/1550.
48. Lai Y Ruscio D Vanderbilt D. Method of purification of polymeric medical device materials using continuous soxhlet extraction. U.S. Patent No. 6 790 318. (last accessed September14 2004).
49. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.012 ↗
50. Fischer F. FDM and Polyjet 3D printing. Popul Plast Packaging, 2015; 60.
51. Safety Data Sheet TANGOPLUS FLX930. http://www.advancedtek.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/SDS-Objet-TangoPlus-FLX930-US.pdf. (last accessed December30 2021).
52. SAFETY DATA SHEET VeroClear™ RGD810. 2020. https://www.stratasys.com/-/media/4514C58E09744D1A9F8425496B720C89.pdf. (last accessed December30 2021).
53. 10.1002/mame.20160055310.1002/mame.201600553 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.06010.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.060 ↗
55. 10.1007/s00894-013-1906-910.1007/s00894-013-1906-9 ↗
56. Wallin RF. A practical guide to ISO 10993: Part 1&# 151; introduction to the standards. 1998.
57. Health C for D and R. Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1 ‘Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process’. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2020). Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/use-international-standard-iso-10993-1-biological-evaluation-medical-devices-part-1-evaluation-and Accessed August12 2021.
58. Wadajkar AS, , Ahn C, , Nguyen KT, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of four vital pulp therapy materials on l929 fibroblasts. Int Sch Res Notices, 2014; 2014.
59. Poskus LT, , Lima RSMS, , Lima IR, et al. Cytotoxicity of current adhesive systems: In vitro testing on cell culture of L929 and balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts. Rev Odonto Ciênc, 2009; 24:129–134.
60. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.06.00310.1016/j.yrtph.2018.06.003 ↗
61. 10.5582/ddt.2016.0104910.5582/ddt.2016.01049 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.493903110.1063/1.4939031 ↗
63. 10.1038/srep2085410.1038/srep20854 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.08.00110.1016/j.mrrev.2012.08.001 ↗
65. Gautriaud E, , Stafford KT, , Adamchuk J, et al. Effect of sterilization on the mechanical properties of silicone rubbers. BioProcess Int, 2010; 8:S42–S49.
66. 10.1039/C4TB00083H10.1039/C4TB00083H ↗
67. Walther C Raddatz G. Process for coating surgical needles. U.S. Patent No. 5 985 355. (last accessed November16 1999).
68. 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.02710.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.027 ↗
69. Wang Z, , Volinsky AA, , Gallant ND. Crosslinking effect on polydimethylsiloxane elastic modulus measured by custom-built compression instrument. J Appl Polym Sci, 2014; 131.
70. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00680-810.1016/S0022-3115(01)00680-8 ↗
71. Yang H He T Yan X. Adhesion strategies for heterogeneous soft materials—A review. Eng Res Express 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ac342e.10.1088/2631-8695/ac342e ↗
72. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/33/33400110.1088/0022-3727/49/33/334001 ↗
73. 10.1002/adma.20060251510.1002/adma.200602515 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.04.01110.1016/j.sna.2015.04.011 ↗
75. 10.1039/C6RA20700F10.1039/C6RA20700F ↗
76. 10.1177/095440541351851510.1177/0954405413518515 ↗
77. 10.1016/0142-9612(95)99693-G10.1016/0142-9612(95)99693-G ↗
78. Register F. Federal Register Vol. 81 No.143. Federal Register Available at: https://thefederalregister.org/81-FR/Issue-143. (last accessed December30 2021).
79. ISO. Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. ISO 10993-1:. 2009. 2009.
80. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.05.07010.1016/j.msec.2014.05.070 ↗