Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Materials and Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
The wide development in biomedical, regenerative medicine, and surgical techniques has ensured that new technologies are developed to improve patient-specific treatment and care. Tissue engineering is a special field in biomedical engineering that works toward cell development using scaffolds. Bone tissue engineering is a separate branch of tissue engineering, in which the construction of bone, functionalities of bone, and bone tissue regeneration are studied in detail to repair or regenerate new functional bone tissues. In India alone, people suffering from bone diseases are extensive in numbers. Almost 15% to 20% of the population suffers from osteoporosis. Bone scaffolds are proving to be an excellent solution for osseous abnormalities or defect treatment. Scaffolds are three dimensional (3D) and mostly porous structures created to enhance new tissue growth. Bone scaffolds are specially designed to promote osteoinductive cell growth, expansion, and migration on their surface. This review article aims to provide an overview of possible bone scaffolding materials in practice, different 3D techniques to fabricate these scaffolds, and effective bone scaffold characteristics targeted by researchers to fabricate tissue-engineered bone scaffolds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department, Assam Don Bosco University, Guwahati, India.
Mechanical Department, DBIT, Mumbai, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, Tezpur Medical College and Hospital, Tezpur, India.
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Kusindarta DL Wihadmadyatami H. The role of extracellular matrix in tissue regeneration. In: Kaoud HA ed. Tissue Regeneration [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 30]; doi: 10.5772/intechopen.75728 Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/6031210.5772/intechopen.75728 ↗
2. 10.1080/09205063.2019.162398910.1080/09205063.2019.1623989 ↗
3. 10.1080/03091902.2018.145709410.1080/03091902.2018.1457094 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.03910.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1204056810.3390/ma12040568 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.00610.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41578-020-0204-210.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
8. 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.1010.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10 ↗
9. 10.15302/J-ENG-201506110.15302/J-ENG-2015061 ↗
10. Wang C, , Huang W, , Zhou Y, et al. 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact Mater, 2020; 5(1):82–91.
11. 10.2174/187421060140801005010.2174/1874210601408010050 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.13810.1016/j.procir.2020.05.138 ↗
13. 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-410.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.04810.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.048 ↗
15. 10.1155/2015/72907610.1155/2015/729076 ↗
16. 10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.8710.5312/wjo.v8.i2.87 ↗
17. 10.1039/C9RA05214C10.1039/C9RA05214C ↗
18. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0047410.3389/fbioe.2020.00474 ↗
19. 10.3390/cells1007174910.3390/cells10071749 ↗
20. 10.4161/cam.4.3.1174710.4161/cam.4.3.11747 ↗
21. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
22. 10.2174/138161282599919101110514810.2174/1381612825999191011105148 ↗
23. Ratner BD Hoffman AS Schoen FJ et al. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. Chemical Engineering. San Diego California USA: Academic Press: Elsevier Inc.; 2013.
24. 10.1186/s13036-017-0074-310.1186/s13036-017-0074-3 ↗
25. 10.1007/s42452-020-1936-810.1007/s42452-020-1936-8 ↗
26. Ranjan N, , Singh R, , Ahuja IPS, et al. Fabrication of pla-hap-cs based biocompatible and biodegradable feedstock filament using twin screw extrusion. Addit Manuf Emerging Mater, 2018; 325–345.
27. Subia B Kundu J Kundu SC. Biomaterial Scaffold Fabrication Techniques for Potential Tissue Engineering Applications. In: Eberli D ed. Tissue Engineering [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2010 [cited 2022 Oct 30]; doi: 10.5772/8581 Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/979810.5772/8581 ↗
28. 10.1155/2011/29060210.1155/2011/290602 ↗
29. Bassas-Galia M Follonier S Pusnik M et al Chapter 2—Natural polymers: A source of inspiration. In: Perale G Hilborn J eds. Bioresorbable Polymers for Biomedical Applications Woodhead Publishing 2017 pp. 31–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100262-9.00002-110.1016/B978-0-08-100262-9.00002-1 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.2392810.1002/pen.23928 ↗
31. Aravamudhan A Ramos DM Nada AA et al. Chapter 4—Natural polymers: Polysaccharides and their derivatives for biomedical applications. In: Kumbar SG Laurencin CT Deng M eds. Natural and Synthetic Biomedical Polymers Elsevier 2014 pp. 67–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396983-5.00004-110.1016/B978-0-12-396983-5.00004-1 ↗
32. Noreen A Sultana S Sultana T et al. Chapter 3—Natural polymers as constituents of bionanocomposites. In: Zia KM Jabeen F Anjum MN Ikram S eds. In Micro and Nano Technologies Bionanocomposites Elsevier 2020 pp. 55–85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816751-9.00003-910.1016/B978-0-12-816751-9.00003-9 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.00510.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.005 ↗
34. 10.3390/molecules2709275710.3390/molecules27092757 ↗
35. 10.3390/bioengineering811016910.3390/bioengineering8110169 ↗
36. 10.3390/molecules2518403510.3390/molecules25184035 ↗
37. 10.3390/md1910055110.3390/md19100551 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.05510.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.055 ↗
39. 10.22203/eCM.v005a0110.22203/eCM.v005a01 ↗
40. 10.1039/D1MA00092F10.1039/D1MA00092F ↗
41. 10.4161/org.2604810.4161/org.26048 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1307110510.3390/polym13071105 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.53410.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.534 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00145-710.1016/S0141-3910(99)00145-7 ↗
45. Zarrintaj P Saeb MR Jafari SH et al. Chapter 18—Application of compatibilized polymer blends in biomedical fields. In: Ajitha AR Thomas S eds. Compatibilization of Polymer Blends Elsevier 2020 pp. 511–537. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816006-0.00018-910.1016/B978-0-12-816006-0.00018-9 ↗
46. Chae MP Hunter-Smith DJ Murphy SV et al. 15—3D bioprinting adipose tissue for breast reconstruction. In: Thomas DJ Jessop ZM Whitaker IS eds. 3D Bioprinting for Reconstructive Surgery Woodhead Publishing 2018 pp. 305–353. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101103-4.00028-410.1016/B978-0-08-101103-4.00028-4 ↗
47. Ramli MS, , Wahab MS, , Ahmad M, et al. FDM preparation of bio-compatible UHMWPE polymer for artificial implant. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci, 2016; 11(8):5474–5480.
48. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.280110.1089/ten.2006.12.2801 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41598-019-46061-710.1038/s41598-019-46061-7 ↗
50. Arakawa CK DeForest CA Chapter 19—Polymer Design and Development. In: Vishwakarma A Karp JM eds. Biology and Engineering of Stem Cell Niches Academic Press 2017 pp. 295–314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802734-9.00019-610.1016/B978-0-12-802734-9.00019-6 ↗
51. Ahmad S. Polyurethane: A versatile scaffold for biomedical applications. Significances Bioeng Biosci, 2018; 2(3); doi: 10.31031/SBB.2018.02.000536
52. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.00210.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.002 ↗
53. 10.3390/ma1206088710.3390/ma12060887 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.00610.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.006 ↗
55. 10.1039/C5TB01043H10.1039/C5TB01043H ↗
56. 10.2147/DDDT.S9753010.2147/DDDT.S97530 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.03910.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.039 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 ↗
59. 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00012-710.1016/S0928-4931(02)00012-7 ↗
60. 10.1002/jbm.b.3029110.1002/jbm.b.30291 ↗
61. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0015010.3389/fmats.2020.00150 ↗
62. 10.3390/mi1107065810.3390/mi11070658 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.04010.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.040 ↗
64. 10.1002/jbm.a.3181610.1002/jbm.a.31816 ↗
65. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00223-510.1016/S0142-9612(02)00223-5 ↗
66. 10.1186/s13287-020-02042-610.1186/s13287-020-02042-6 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.01710.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
68. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.845.86210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.845.862 ↗
69. 10.1186/s12938-020-00810-210.1186/s12938-020-00810-2 ↗
70. 10.3390/polym1107109410.3390/polym11071094 ↗
71. 10.1038/s41378-019-0116-810.1038/s41378-019-0116-8 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.03310.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.033 ↗
73. Munir KS, , Li Y, , Wen C. Metallic scaffolds manufactured by selective laser melting for biomedical applications. Metallic Foam Bone Process Modification Charact Prop, 2017; 1–23.
74. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0016410.3389/fbioe.2019.00164 ↗
75. 10.1039/C7BM00514H10.1039/C7BM00514H ↗
76. 10.1515/epoly-2020-004610.1515/epoly-2020-0046 ↗
77. 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.0009210.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00092 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10949010.1016/j.matdes.2021.109490 ↗
79. 10.1007/s42247-019-00048-210.1007/s42247-019-00048-2 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.00110.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.001 ↗
81. 10.1186/s40902-020-00263-610.1186/s40902-020-00263-6 ↗